Article published In: EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 6 (2006)
Edited by Susan H. Foster-Cohen, Marta Medved Krajnovic and Jelena Mihaljević Djigunović
[EUROSLA Yearbook 6] 2006
► pp. 7–25
Accounting for English article interpretation by L2 speakers
Published online: 20 July 2006
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.04haw
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.6.04haw
Ionin, Ko and Wexler (2004a) have shown that L2 speakers of English whose L1’s lack articles (Russian and Korean) appear to fluctuate in their interpretation of the and a, allowing them to encode either definiteness or specificity. They argue that these are two options of an Article Choice Parameter offered by Universal Grammar, and that the Russian and Korean speakers fluctuate between them when they are acquiring English. In the present study it is shown that a similar pattern can be observed in L2 speakers of English whose L1 is Japanese (also a language that lacks articles) but not in speakers whose L1 is Greek, a language with articles that encode definiteness like English. It is also shown that while group results for the Japanese speakers suggest fluctuation, individual results do not. It is argued that an account can be given of both cases which does not require appeal either to an Article Choice Parameter or to the concept of ‘fluctuation’. The alternative proposal made here is consistent with Universal Grammar, and follows from an organisation of the grammar where phonological exponents are separated from the lexical items manipulated by syntactic computations, as in Distributed Morphology. It is suggested that a descriptively adequate account which avoids a construction-specific parameter like the Article Choice Parameter and departure from the normal assumptions of UG represented by fluctuation should be preferred.
Cited by (41)
Cited by 41 other publications
Derkach, Kateryna & Theodora Alexopoulou
Sabir, Mona & Alaa Melebari
Zhang, Jing
Zheng, Zhang, Laurence Newbery-Payton & Sho Fukuda
Kimura, Takayuki
2022. Explaining the difficulty with L2 acquisition of scope
interpretation by speakers of a scope-rigid language. In Generative SLA in the Age of Minimalism [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 67], ► pp. 41 ff.
Wiese, Heike, Artemis Alexiadou, Shanley Allen, Oliver Bunk, Natalia Gagarina, Kateryna Iefremenko, Maria Martynova, Tatiana Pashkova, Vicky Rizou, Christoph Schroeder, Anna Shadrova, Luka Szucsich, Rosemarie Tracy, Wintai Tsehaye, Sabine Zerbian & Yulia Zuban
Ionin, Tania, Sea Hee Choi & Qiufen Liu
Kwame, Abukari & Marit Westergaard
Yoo, Isaiah WonHo & Yu Kyoung Shin
Zhao, Helen
Kedar, Yarden
Lopez, Elaine
Abumelha, Mary
Snape, Neal & Mari Umeda
Le Bruyn, Bert & Xiaoli Dong
2017. Specificity and validity in the SLA literature. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 75 ff.
Quyen Nguyen
Schaeffer, Jeannette, Chantal Horselenberg & Margreet van Koert
2017. L2 Acquisition of English article choice by Dutch native speakers. In Cross-linguistic Influence in Bilingualism [Studies in Bilingualism, 52], ► pp. 279 ff.
Xiao-Ming, Zheng, Wang Junrui, Feng Li, Liu Sha, Pang Hongbo, Qi Lan, Li Jing, Sun Yan, Qiao Weihua, Zhang Lifang, Cheng Yunlian & Yang Qingwen
Abudalbuh, Majdi
Morales-Reyes, Alexandra & Inmaculada Gómez Soler
Qihao, Xu, Shi Yunzhang & Snape Neal
Schwartz, Mila & Hadas Rovner
Chrabaszcz, Anna & Nan Jiang
Jin-young Tak
Winward, John
Lee Amuzie, Grace & Patti Spinner
Momenzade, Marjansadat, Manijeh Youhanaee & Zohreh Kassaian
Momenzade, Marjansadat, Manijeh Youhanaee & Zohreh Kassaian
Momenzade, Marjansadat, Manijeh Youhanaee & Zohreh Kassaian
Ionin, Tania, Soondo Baek, Eunah Kim, Heejeong Ko & Kenneth Wexler
Lemhöfer, Kristin & Mirjam Broersma
Rothman, Jason & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
Falk, Ylva & Camilla Bardel
Ionin, Tania, Silvina Montrul, Ji-Hye Kim & Vadim Philippov
Jaensch, Carol
Snape, Neal & Tanja Kupisch
Wakabayashi, Shigenori
Ionin, Tania, Maria Luisa Zubizarreta & Salvador Bautista Maldonado
Zdorenko, Tatiana & Johanne Paradis
Zdorenko, Tatiana & Johanne Paradis
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
