Cover not available

Article published In: EUROSLA Yearbook: Volume 14 (2014)
Edited by Leah Roberts, Ineke Vedder and Jan H. Hulstijn
[EUROSLA Yearbook 14] 2014
► pp. 173–200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Interfaces in the interpretation of mood alternation in L2 Spanish

Morpho-phonology, semantics and pragmatics

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
 | Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, UNED, Spain
 | Universidad de las Islas Baleares, Spain
Published online: 5 August 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.14.07ahe
In this paper, we present the results of one written task testing the interpretation of mood choice in if-conditional constructions in L2 Spanish: a linguistic task of conditional utterances containing both regular and irregular indicative and subjunctive forms was completed by 48 L1 French and 40 L1 English speakers, and by an L1 Spanish control group (n = 35). Results show a similar pattern in the answers of both experimental groups despite the varying degree of similarity and disparity among the languages. We adopt a cognitive pragmatic perspective for the analysis of the results in connection with the various kinds of effects created by mood alternation in the constructions studied. Furthermore, in relation to current SLA debates (Lardiere 2008, 2009), our findings demonstrate that feature re-assembly in L2 Spanish is not trouble-free, as simple current feature accounts would advocate, even if those features exist in the learners’ L1.
References (53)
Ahern, A. 2004. El subjuntivo: significado e inferencia. Un estudio basado en la Teoría de la Relevancia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Spanish mood, metarrepresentation and propositional attitudes.” In Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics, K. Turner and K. von Heusinger (eds), 445–471. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Propositional attitudes in relevance theory: An overview.” In In the Mind and across Minds: A Relevance-Theoretic Perspective on Communication and Translation, E. Wałaszewska, M. Kisielewska-Krysiuk and A. Piskorska (eds), 147–167. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amenos-Pons, J. 2010. Los tiempos de pasado del español y el francés: semántica, pragmática y aprendizaje de E/LE. Perspectivas desde la Teoría de la Relevancia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Madrid: UNED.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Spanish ‘Imperfecto’ vs. French ‘Imparfait’ in hypothetical clauses: A procedural account.” Cahiers Chronos 271: 243–271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, R. and Shirai, Y. 1994. “Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 161: 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belletti, A., Bennati, E. and Sorace, A. 2007. “Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 657–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bergs, A. and Heine, L. 2010. “Mood in English.” In Mood in the Languages of Europe, 
B. Rothstein and R. Thieroff (eds), 103–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C. and Prévost, P. 2003. “Knowledge of polarity subjunctive in L2 Spanish.” In Proceedings of the 27 Boston University Conference on Language Development, B. Beachley, A. Brown and F. Conlin (eds), 150–161, Boston: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borgonovo, C. et al. 2008. “Methodological issues in the L2 acquisition of syntax/semantics phenomenon: How to assess L2 knowledge of mood in Spanish Relative Clauses.” In Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, J. Bruhn de Garavito and E. Valenzuela (eds), 13–24. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bres, J. 2006. “Encore un peu, et l’imparfait était un mode. L’imparfait et la valeur modale de contrefactualité.” Cahiers de Praxématique 461: 149–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Et plus si affinités… Des liaisons entre les instructions du plus-que-parfait et les relations d’ordre.” Cahiers Chronos 181: 139–157.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Sans l’imparfait, les vendanges tardives ne rentraient pas dans la jupe rhénane… Sur l’imparfait contrefactuel, pour avancer”. Syntaxe et Sémantique 101: 33–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 2007. “Of minds and language.” Biolinguistics 11: 9–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. and Felser, C. 2006. “Grammatical processing in language learners.” Applied Psycholinguistics 27 (1): 3–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corminboeuf, G. 2009. L’expression de l’hypothèse en français. Entre hypotaxe et parataxe. 
Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mulder, W. 2010. “Mood in French”. In Mood in the Languages of Europe, B. Rothstein & R. Thieroff (eds), 157–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Saussure, L. 2003. Temps et pertinence. Éléments de pragmatique cognitive du temps. 
Bruxelles: De Boeck / Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Perspectival interpretation of tenses.” In Time, Language, Cognition and Reality, K.M. Jaszcolt and L. de Saussure (eds), 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V. and Leonetti, M. 2003. “On the quotative readings of Spanish imperfecto.” Cuadernos de Lingüística X1: 135–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “On the rigidity of procedural meaning.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, V. Escandell-Vidal, M. Leonetti and A. Ahern (eds), 81–103. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, V., Leonetti, M. and Ahern, A. (eds). 2011. Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foster-Cohen, S. 2002. “The relevance of relevance theory to first and second language acquisition.” In Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics from the 14th International Symposium. Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics , M. Makri-Tsilipaku (ed.), 9–23. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece.
Giorgi, A. and Pianesi, F. 1997. Tense and Aspect. From Semantics to Morphosyntax. New York / Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse. M. 2011. Le bon usage de la langue française, 15th Edition. Bruxelles: De Boeck-Duculot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hambleton, R.K., Swaminathan, H., and Rogers, H.J. 1991. Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. 1989. An Introduction to English Transformational Syntax. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jary, M. 2009. “Relevance, assertion and possible worlds: A cognitive approach to the Spanish subjunctive.” In Utterance Interpretation and Cognitive Models, P. de Brabantier and M. Kissine (eds), 235–277. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lardiere, D. 2008. “Feature assembly in second language in second language acquisition.” In Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras et al. (eds), 106–140. New Jersey: 
Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Some thoughts on a contrastive analysis of feature in second language acquisition.” Second Language Research 25 (2): 173–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moeschler, J. 1998. “Pragmatique de la référence temporelle.” In Le temps des événements, J. Moeschler (ed.), 157–180. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montolío, E. 1999. “Las construcciones condicionales.” In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española. Vol. 3. Entre la oración y el discurso, I. Bosque Morfología and V. Demonte (eds), 3643–3739. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S. and Slabakova, R. 2002. “On aspectual shifts in L2 Spanish.” In BUCLD 26 Proceedings, B. Skarabela et al. (eds), 631–642. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Competence similarities between natives and near-native speakers: An investigation of the preterit/imperfect contrast in Spanish.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 251: 351–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolle, S. 1997. “A relevance-theoretic account of be going to.” Journal of Linguistics 331: 355–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F.R. 2001. Mood and Modality, 2nd Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perez-Leroux, A et al.2007. “Non-native recognition of the iterative and habitual meanings of Spanish preterite and imperfect tenses.” In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, J. Liceras, H. Zolb and H. Goodluck (eds), 432–451. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Real Academia Española and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2009. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. 2009. “Understanding the nature and outcomes of early bilingualism: Romance languages as heritage languages.” International Journal of Bilingualism 13 (2): 145–155. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothman, J. and Slabakova, R. 2011. “The mind-context divide: On linguistic interfaces and language acquisition.” Lingua 121 (4): 568–576 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouchota, V. 1994. “The subjunctive in modern Greek: Dividing the labour between semantics and pragmatics.” Journal of Modern Greek Studies 121: 185–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A. and Paoli, S. 2004. “Transfer at the syntax-pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in Italian-English bilingual and monolingual acquisition.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 71: 183–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, A. 2006. “Gradience and optionality in mature and developing grammars.” In Gradience in Grammars: Generative Perspectives, G. Fanselow et al. (eds), 106–123. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism.” Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 11: 1–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1986/1995. Relevance. Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terrell, T.D. and Hooper, J. 1974. “A semantically based analysis of mood in Spanish.” Hispania 571: 484–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M. and Sorace, A. 2006. “Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax-semantics and syntax-discourse phenomena.” In Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development, D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia and C. Zaller (eds), 653–664. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I.M., Sorace, A., Heycock, C. and Filiaci, F. 2004. “First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English.” International Journal of Bilingualism 81: 257–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L. 2003. Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge.” In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, W. Ritchie and T.K. Bhatia (eds), 49–67. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Mañas Navarrete, I., E. Rosado Villegas, S. Mujcinovic & N. Fullana Rivera
2025. Acquisition of modal readings of the Imperfect tense in L2 Spanish. Language Acquisition 32:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jia
2023. Discussion. In Interfaces and Features in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jia
2023. Theoretical Frameworks and Related Studies. In Interfaces and Features in Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jia & Yuet Hung Cecilia Chan
2021. A feature-based approach to the acquisition of L2 Chinese negation by L1-English and L1-Korean learners. Lingua 252 ► pp. 103018 ff. DOI logo
Ahern, Aoife, José Amenós-Pons & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2019. Interpreting mood choice effects in L2 and L1 Spanish: empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Applied Linguistics Review 10:4 ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo
Ahern, Aoife, José Amenós-Pons & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2023. Relevance theory and the study of linguistic interfaces in second language acquisition. Intercultural Pragmatics 20:4 ► pp. 429 ff. DOI logo
Ayoun, Dalila & Charlene Gilbert
2017. The acquisition of modal auxiliaries in English by advanced Francophone learners. In Tense-Aspect-Modality in a Second Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 50], ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Ahern, Aoife K., José Amenós-Pons & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2015. Metarepresentation and evidentiality in Spanish tense and mood. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 29 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue