Cover not available

Article published In: The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause:
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 115–142

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Specificational there-clefts

Functional structure and information structure

Published online: 30 June 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.07dav
In this article we present functional-structural and information structure arguments for recognizing specificational there-clefts, i.e. clefts that specify a value for a variable. We distinguish two types which hinge on whether the matrix is a listing or a canonical existential. Listing there-clefts enumerate one or more instances as corresponding to the variable, e.g. You are quite right David, it was engineered, seems there’s only me and you who can see this. Quantifying there-clefts indicate the quantity of instantiation of the variable, e.g. Look at the shape of it. There’s only one thing that’s that shape.
References (41)
Bicler, Chris & Kristin Davidse. 2010. It-clefts in casual conversational English: The weakening of their specificational meaning. In Distinctions in English Grammar. Offered to Renaat Declerck, Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds). Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 260–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Budts, Sara, Michelle Peeters & Elisah Van Lommel. 2013. Existential there-clefts revisited. Unpublished term paper. University of Leuven.
Carlson, Greg. 1978. Reference to Kinds in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter. 1991. Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 141: 419–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1706–1720. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin. 1992. Existential constructions: A systemic perspective. Leuvense Bijdragen 811: 71–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999a. Are there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts? In Thinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, Guy Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds). Leuven: Peeters, 177–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999b. The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 101: 203–250.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 381: 1101–1131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Ditte Kimps. 2014. Distinguishing and subclassifying there-clefts. Paper presented at ICAME 351. Nottingham, 29 April–4 May 2014.
Declerck, Renaat. 1984. The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 641: 251–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delin, Judy. 1992. Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics 91: 289–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline. 2015. The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 221. [URL] (Last accessed on 24 December 2015).
Halliday, M.A.K. 1967a. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967b. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & William Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy. 2000. The referential status of clefts. Language 761: 891–920. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Higgins, Francis. 1973. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2004. It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written Texts. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 391: 463–516. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William, 1997. Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1978. Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings 4: 114–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rando, Emily & Donna Napoli. 1978. Definites in there-sentences. Language 541: 300–313. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reeve, Matthew. 2011. The syntactic structure of English clefts. Lingua 1211: 142–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 251: 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tench, Paul. 1996. The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Harder, Peter
2024. Reconnecting form and meaning. In honour of Kristin Davidse. Studies in language companion series 230. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 56:1 ► pp. 87 ff. DOI logo
Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse
2023. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Conclusion. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Introduction. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Structural Assemblies and Semantics of the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2023. Reconnecting form and meaning. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2023. On the use of there-clefts with zero subject relativizer. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
van Praet, Wout
2023. Referential accessibility as an index of the discourse functions of predicative and specificational clauses. Text & Talk 43:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition ofc’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
2018. Non-prototypical clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Destruel, Emilie
2017. The pragmatics of French (non-)prototypical clefts: Influence of the type of question on naturalness and interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 121 ► pp. 58 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue