Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 8:2 (2015) ► pp.236–264

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Conjunctive structures in learner English

A qualitative analysis of hortatory expositions

Published online: 3 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.8.2.05dav
In this paper we address the issue of conjunction use in learner writing from a text-structuring angle, focusing on hortatory expositions by NNS learners and NS professionals. The learners are advanced Dutch-speaking students of English, while the professionals are journalists writing for British quality newspapers. We investigate how external conjunctive items (CIs), which express real-world relations between states of affairs, interact with internal CIs, which relate to the writer’s speech acts or modal positions, to construct specific rhetorical macro-structures, or conjunctive profiles. On the basis of qualitative and quantitative analysis, we identify four profiles: (1) predominance of internal CIs, (2) predominant use of external CIs, (3) spreading of external and internal CIs over the whole essay, (4) concentration of internal CIs in introduction and conclusion. The first profile is exclusive to NNS learner writing, but the other three profiles are found in both NNS and NS expositions. Gross overuse of CIs is found in the first and second learner profiles only. Overall, the advanced learner essays display emergent conjunctive macro-structuring, which teaching can build on.
References (32)
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crewe, William. 1990. The illogic of logical connectives. ELT Journal 441: 316–325. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Eirian. [1979] 2015. On the Semantics of Syntax: Mood and Condition in English. ­London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language 81: 217–251. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, Yvette & Lee Mee Yip. 1992. A comparison of internal conjunctive cohesion in the ­English essay writing of Cantonese speakers and native speakers of English. RELC Journal 231: 15–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, Linda. 1981. Problem-solving Strategies for Writing. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Magali Paquot. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 11: 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Stephanie Tyson. 1996. Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes 151: 17–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hinkel, Eli. 2009. Second Language Writers’ Text. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 251: 156–177.
Intaraprawat, Puangpun & Margaret Steffensen. 1995. The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays. Journal of Second Language Writing 41: 253–272.
Kohnen, Thomas. 2007. Connective profiles in the history of English texts: Aspects of orality and literacy. In Clausal Connectives in the History of English, Ursula Lenker & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 289–308. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James. 1983. Conjunction. The logic of English text. In Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts, János Petöfi & Emel Sözer (eds.). Hamburg: Büske-Verlag, 1–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. English Text. System and Structure. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCrostie, James. 2008. Writer visibility in EFL learner academic writing: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal 321: 97–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, John & Elza Tsang. 1993. A corpus-based study of logical connectors in EFL students’ writing: Directions for future research. In Studies in Lexis, Richard Pemberton & Elza Tsang (eds.). Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, 215–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myhill, Debra. 2009. From talking to writing: Linguistic development in writing. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II 6: 27–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nash, Walter. 1980. Designs in Prose. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2004. Learner corpora and their potential in language teaching. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching, John Sinclair (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 125–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1991. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tankó, Gyula. 2004. The use of adverbial connectors in Hungarian university student’s ­argumentative essays. In How to Use Corpora in Language Teaching, John Sinclair (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 157–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2009. Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-­Functional Approach. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 1999. The distinction between epistemic and speech act conjunction. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature 119–130.
. 2002. The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. WORD 531: 37–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamel, Vivian. 1983. The composing processes of advanced ESL students: Six case studies. TESOL Quarterly 171: 165–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue