Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 8:1 (2015) ► pp.21–64

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

A corpus-based account of left-detached items in the recent history of English

Left Dislocation vs. Left Detached-sequences

Published online: 10 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.8.1.02tiz
This paper investigates sequences featuring a coreferential link between a left-detached constituent and a resumptive in the following main clause [‘LDet-sequences’]. Their syntactic, semantic and textual behaviour is investigated in historically recent texts (since Modern English) where such detachments are not generally expected to replicate the behaviour that has been attested for contemporary spoken English Left Dislocation [‘LDis’] (cf. Geluykens 1993; Gregory & Michaelis 2001; Snider 2005; Netz et al. 2011). A typology of LDet-sequences is proposed in order to investigate them beyond their apparent structural similarities with spoken English LDis. Left-detached referents are found to typically hold a weak relationship with clause-grammar; however, some of the LDet-sequences attested also exhibit a certain degree of deviation from the less syntactic and freer, discoursal behaviour that characterises others. As far as their diachronic development is concerned, only LDet-sequences that closely resemble LDis illustrate the declining course reported in previous research for LDis (cf. Pérez-Guerra & Tizón-Couto 2009). Lastly, LDet-sequences are more frequent in drama and fiction; thus, the prediction that they are employed to recreate conversation (cf. Geluykens 1992) is provisionally borne out.
References (65)
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1996. The Puzzle of Apposition: On So-called Appositive Structures in English. Santiago de Compostela: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Acuña Fariña, Juan Carlos. 1999. On apposition. English Language and Linguistics 3 (1): 59–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). 1997. Materials on Left Dislocation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ARCHER 3.1 = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers version 3.1. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber and Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California; modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Bamberg, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Lancaster, Leicester, Manchester, Michigan, Northern Arizona, Santiago de Compostela, Southern California, Trier, Uppsala, Zurich. Examples of usage taken from ARCHER were obtained under the terms of the ARCHER User Agreement (available on the Documentation page of the ARCHER website, <[URL]>, last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Barcelona Sánchez, Antonio. 1988. El tópico desgajado en inglés: Motivación pragmática. Atlantis 10 (1–2): 9–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty. 2004. Discourse functions at the periphery: Noncanonical word order in English. ZASPIL 35 (1): 41–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty & Gregory Ward. 2002. Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1363–1447.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Cheryl. 1983. Topic continuity in written English narrative. In Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study, Talmy Givón (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 313–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1975. Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13 (3): 391–419.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds.). New York: Academic Press, 71–132.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vries, Mark. 2007. Dislocation and backgrounding. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Bettelou Los & Marjo van Koppen (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 235–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part II: Complex and Derived Constructions. Kees Hengeveld (ed.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 2006. English Grammar: A University Course. Abingdon and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia, Barbara Fox & Sandra Thompson. 2003. Social interaction and grammar. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure. Vol. 21, Michael Tomasello (ed.). London: Lawrence, 119–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. Syntactic, semantic and interactional prototypes: The case of left-dislocation. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language, Richard Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 709–730. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez-González, María Ángeles. 2001. The Theme-topic Interface: Evidence from English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Álvarez, Dolores. 2002. Disjunct Adverbs in Early Modern English: A Corpus-based Study. Vigo: University of Vigo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregory, Michelle & Laura Michaelis. 2001. Topicalization and left-dislocation: A functional opposition revisited. Journal of Pragmatics 33 (11): 1665–1706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2000. Copy left dislocation. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Roger Billerey & Brook Danielle Lillehaugen (eds.). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 139–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette. 1977. The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax (Studies in English Language). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Stefan Gries. 2009. Assessing frequency changes in multi-stage diachronic corpora: Applications for historical corpus linguistics and the study of language acquisition. Literary and Linguistic Computing 24 (4): 385–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirschbühler, Paul. 1997. The source of lefthand NPs in French. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 55–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1937. Analytic Syntax. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan-Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin. 1976. Foregrounding referents: A reconsideration of left dislocation in discourse. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 240–257.
Keizer, Evelien. 2005. The discourse function of close appositions. Neophilologus 89 (3): 447–467. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kies, Daniel. 1988. Marked themes with and without pronominal reinforcement: Their meaning and distribution in discourse. In Pragmatics, Discourse and Text: Some Systemically-inspired Approaches, Erich Steiner & Robert Veltman (eds.). London: Pinter, 47–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Lauren Delfs. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Aanthony & Ariel Diertani. 2010. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Modern British English (PPCMBE). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, first edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Kroch, Anthony & Ann Taylor. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English (PPCME2). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania. CD-ROM, second edition, <[URL]> (Last accessed on 30 June 2014).
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. On the formal and functional relationship between topics and vocatives: Evidence from French. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 267–288.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsson, Eva. 1979. La Dislocation en français: Étude de syntaxe generative (Études Romanes de Lund). Lund: CWK Gleerup.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lennard, John. 1995. Punctuation: and – Pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas Jucker (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 65–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Erwin Komen. 2012. Clefts as resolution strategies after the loss of a multifunctional first position. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 884–898.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Charles. 1992. Apposition in Contemporary English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Philip. 2001. Discourse constraints on (non)extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39 (4): 683–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montgomery, Michael. 1982. The functions of left dislocation in spontaneous discourse. In The Ninth Lacus Forum, John Morreal (ed.). Columbia: Hornbeam, 425–432.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Netz, Hadar, Ron Kuzar & Zohar Eviatar. 2011. A recipient-based study of the discourse functions of marked topic constructions. Language Sciences 33 (1): 154–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick. 2004. On split-CPs, uninterpretable features, and the ‘perfectness’ of language. ZASPIL 35 (2): 399–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. BLS 20 (1994): 402–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence, parsed version. 2006. Annotated by Ann Taylor, Arja Nurmi, Anthony Warner, Susan Pintzuk & Terttu Nevalainen. Compiled by the CEEC Project Team. York: University of York and Helsinki: University of Helsinki. Distributed through the Oxford Text Archive.
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 1999. Historical English Syntax: A Statistical Corpus Based Study on the Organisation of Early Modern English Sentences. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Word order after the loss of the verb-second constraint or the importance of early Modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86 (4): 342–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier & David Tizón-Couto. 2009. On left dislocation in the recent history of English: Theory and data hand in hand. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.). London: Routledge, 31–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1997. On the functions of left-dislocation in English discourse. In Directions in Functional Linguistics, Akio Kamio (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 117–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. On the limits of syntax, with reference to left-dislocation and topicalization. In The Limits of Syntax, Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press, 281–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27 (1): 53–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodman, Robert. 1974. On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 71: 437–66. [1997. Reprinted In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 31–54] Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. MIT: Doctoral Dissertation. [1986. Published as Infinite Syntax! Norton, NJ: Ablex].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1973. A fake NP squish. In New Ways of Analyzing Variation in English, Charles-James Bailey & Roger Shuy (eds.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 96–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snider, Neal. 2005. A corpus study of left dislocation and topicalization. Stanford University: Linguistics Department, TS. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 29 April 2011).
Tizón-Couto, David. 2012. Left Dislocation in English: A Functional-discoursal Approach (Linguistic Insights 143). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. A corpus-based account of the decline of left-dislocated noun phrases in the recent history of English. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics , Leuven.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. The History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Old English left-dislocations: Their structure and information status. Folia Linguistica 41 (3–4): 405–441. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1997. Left dislocation. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vat, Jan. 1997. Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. In Materials on Left Dislocation, Elena Anagnostopoulou, Henk van Riemsdijk & Frans Zwarts (eds.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 67–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The syntax of sentence periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Wald, Benji. 1983. Referents and topics within and across discourse units: Observations from current vernacular English. In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, Flora Klein-Andreu (ed.). London and New York: Academic Press, 91–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Pashkova, Tatiana, Hannah Lee, Mark Murphy & Shanley E. M. Allen
2025. Left dislocations across discourse types in monolinguals and bilinguals’ English. Linguistics DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2016. Left-dislocated strings in Modern English epistolary prose. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2017. Exploring the Left Dislocation construction by means of multiple linear regression. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 31 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Tizón-Couto, David
2018. Complexity and genre distribution of left-dislocated strings after the fixation of SVO syntax. In Explorations in English historical syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue