Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 3:1 (2010) ► pp.74–94
Imperatives of visual versus auditory perception as pragmatic markers in English and Dutch
Published online: 8 April 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.1.05van
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.3.1.05van
This article examines the English and Dutch imperatives of intentional visual and auditory perception and in particular their use as pragmatic markers. Look, listen, kijk ‘look’ and luister ‘listen’ are compared with respect to frequency, distribution and usage. The difference between look and kijk, on the one hand, and listen and luister, on the other, is argued to be indicative of a more general cross-linguistic tendency. This tendency is explained in terms of the imperatives’ effectiveness in and likely recruitment for what has traditionally been called attention-getting and in terms of the common view of the nature of visual and auditory perception.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
de Hoop, Helen & Gijs Mulder
2022. Claiming common ground with utterance-final particle hoor in Dutch. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 88 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Vittorio Tantucci
Nau, Nicole
2021. Another ‘look!’. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 111 ff.
Van Olmen, Daniël & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2021. Pragmatic markers and peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 1 ff.
Jansegers, Marlies & Marta Albelda Marco
Van Olmen, Daniël
Van Olmen, Daniël
2021. Second person parentheticals of unintentional visual perception
in British English. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 251 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
