Cover not available

Article published In: Interdisciplinary approaches to the language of pop culture
Edited by Rocío Montoro and Valentin Werner
[English Text Construction 16:2] 2023
► pp. 214–237

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Chick Lit

Characterisation through laughter-talk in conversational humour

 | University of Granada
 | University of Granada
Published online: 29 February 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.22028.mon
Abstract
In this paper, we look at characterisation in the popular fiction genre Chick Lit by analysing laughter-talk in conversational humour. This is the first systematic analysis of how a variety of humour phenomena are linguistically realised in the genre despite humour being as aspect recurrently referred to as intrinsic to the genre. We use a combination of methods, both corpus-based and qualitative in nature, to identify instances in which laughter occurs, which we (broadly) associate with the presence of humour. Thus, with the use of self-compiled corpora, we assess the nature of humorous mechanisms in the genre. We conclude by arguing that humorous encounters are genre-defining and essential for characterisation. Humour analysis allows us to argue that Chick Lit protagonists are prototypically presented as non-aggressive, non-threatening individuals, which also contributes to the depiction of down-to-earth characters readers expect in the genre.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chick Lit and conversational humour through laughter-talk
  • 3.Methodology, data and research questions
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Corpus-based analysis
    • 4.2Conversational humour
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Archer, Dawn, Andrew Wilson & Paul Rayson. 2002. Introduction to the USAS category system. [URL]
Attardo, Salvatore. 2020. The linguistics of humor. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Toward a social critique of humour. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chick Lit Books, [URL] (21 November 2022)
Chick Lit Writers, [URL] (21 November 2022)
Colston, Herbert & Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32(11). 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunning, Ted. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1). 61–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5). 1284–1299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains, 217–241. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research 1(1). 22–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. But seriously: On conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 1971. 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferris, Suzanne & Mallory Young. 2006a. Introduction. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 1–13.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds.). 2006b. Chick Lit: The new woman’s fiction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Charlotte Taylor & Anna Marchi (eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–258. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelder, Ken. 2004. Popular fiction: The logics and practices of a literary field. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2014. Log ratio: An informal introduction. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS). [URL] (08 January 2021)
Harzewski, Stephanie. 2011. Chick Lit and postfeminism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewett, Heather. 2006. You are not alone: The personal, the political and the “new” Mommy Lit. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 119–139.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 55–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humour. Humor 191. 217–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lampert, Martin D. & Susan M. Ervin-Tripp. 2006. Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics 38(1). 51–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucariello, Joan. 1994. Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123(2). 129–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marszalek, Agnes. 2019. Constructing inferiority through comic characterisation: Self-deprecating humour and cringe comedy in High Fidelity and Bridget Jones’s Diary. In Benedict Neurohr & Lizzie Stewart-Shaw (eds.), Experiencing fictional worlds, 119–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Rod A. 2007. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Missler, Heike. 2016. The cultural politics of Chick Lit: Popular fiction, postfeminism and representation. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montoro, Rocío. 2007. Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction: A socio-cognitive perspective. In Marina Lambrou & Peter Stockwell (eds.), Contemporary stylistics, 68–80. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Chick Lit: The stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 1993. Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4). 409–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Non-verbal humor and joke performance. Humor 17(4). 401–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Jeremy. 1991. Potboilers: Methods, concepts and case studies in popular fiction. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2006. The linguistics of laughter. A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. From Wodehouse to the White House: A corpus-assisted study of play, fantasy and dramatic incongruity in comic writing and laughter-talk. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(2). 189–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew. 2010. Popular fiction studies: The advantages of a new field. Studies in Popular Culture 33(1). 21–35. [URL]
Sinkeviciute, Valeria & Marta Dynel. 2017. Approaching conversational humour culturally: A survey of the emerging area of investigation. Language & Communication 551. 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, Juliette. 2006. Mothers of Chick Lit? Women writers, readers and literary history. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 47–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yardley, Cathy. 2006. Will write for shoes: How to write a Chick Lit novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf & S. Holly Stocking. 1976. Putdown humor. Journal of Communication 26(3). 154–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ziv, Avner. 1984. Personality and sense of humor. New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Castro, Adrián
2025.  The year’s work in stylistics 2023 & 2024 . Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 34:3 ► pp. 302 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue