Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 2:2 (2009) ► pp.185–208
Go-and-V, come-and-V, go-V and come-V
A corpus-based account of deictic movement verb constructions
Published online: 27 October 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.2.2.03nic
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.2.2.03nic
The present paper aims to complement recent work on deictic movement verb constructions by using a corpus-based approach to identify differences between the four deictic movement verb constructions: go-and-V, come-and-V, go-V and come-V, and to evaluate the proposal made in Nicolle (2007) that go/come-V developed from go/come-and-V in the context of imperative clauses. It will be shown that this is a possible scenario for the development of go-V from go-and-V, although come-V may have developed by analogy with go-V rather than independently from come-and-V. Finally, subjectification will be proposed as a motivating factor in the development of both go-V and come-V.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Fanego, Teresa
2025. The go Ving network in twenty-first century English. In The Progressive Revisited [Studies in Language Companion Series, 236], ► pp. 126 ff.
Cheng, Yan & Chris Sinha
Giusti, Giuliana, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro & Daniel Ross
2022. Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions. In Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 274], ► pp. 1 ff.
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Eliese-Sophia Lincke, Kiki Nikiforidou & Anna Piata
2020. On the polysemy of motion verbs in Ancient Greek and Coptic. Studies in Language 44:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
