Article published In: Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin Davidse
Edited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 233–248
Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.03lan
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.03lan
Absolute quantifiers (e.g. many, few, three) have adjectival uses, but when initial they function as grounding elements: like demonstratives, articles, and relative quantifiers (e.g. all, most, every), they indicate the epistemic status of the nominal referent. This ambivalence is due to their being intermediate, having semantic affinities with both categories but being marginal with respect to each. The dual role of absolute quantifiers is readily described in Cognitive Grammar, given its dynamic view of meaning as consisting in semantic functions (interactive tasks to be fulfilled). These functions belong to the symbolic assemblies constituting language structure; they are fundamental, the role of lexicon and grammar being to effect their implementation. More schematic functions –such as grounding –are independent of any particular implementation. In the absence of a dedicated grounding element, absolute quantifiers assume that function through a conventional pattern of implicit functional augmentation (a common type of construction).
Keywords: epistemic control, identification, quantification, reference, universality
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Two sorts of quantifiers
- 3.Rationale for a unified treatment
- 4.Theoretical basis: Semantic functions
- 5.The analysis
- 6.Conclusion
References
References (19)
Culicover, Peter W. & Ray Jackendoff. 2012. Same-except: A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language 881: 305–340.
Davidse, Kristin. 2004. The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 11: 19–80.
Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kirsner, Robert S. 1993. From meaning to message in two theories: Cognitive and Saussurean views of the Modern Dutch demonstratives. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (Cognitive Linguistics Research 3), Richard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–114.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
2004. Remarks on nominal grounding. Functions of Language 111: 77–113.
2005. Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Diane Pecher & Rolf A. Zwaan (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–197.
2013. The indefinite article in complex quantifiers. In Language and the Creative Mind, Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 65–81.
2016a. Nominal grounding and English quantifiers. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 31: 1–31.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
Kratochvílová, Dana
Davidse, Kristin
2022. Refining and re-defining secondary determiners in relation to primary determiners. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 27 ff.
Passos, Hayat & Maíra Avelar
Szymańska, Monika
2021. Grammatical metonymy and construal operations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 465 ff.
Praet, Wout Van
2019. Aspect and modality in English predicative and specificational copular clauses. English Text Construction 12:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
