Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.68–88

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Exploring the use of modality in EFL learners’ writing

 | Shahrood University of Technology
 | Shahrood University of Technology
 | Shahrood University of Technology
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
Abstract
Due to prevalence of formal analysis in language education, the implications of Systemic Functional Grammar has largely been ignored by materials and methods of language education. To illustrate the inadequacies of formal analysis and make a case for functional analysis and assessment of writing samples, this study aims at exploring the use of modality in a random sample of expository essays written in an EFL context. To this end, 20 expository essays, written by undergraduate students of English language and literature, were randomly obtained from writing instructors and professors teaching in the English department of Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Iran. Leaners’ use of modality was then analyzed in line with the framework presented by Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar. Analysis revealed learners’ lack of variation in the expression of uncertainties and doubts and as such lack of mastery over modality since they tended to express their opinions as implicit and as objective as possible. There seems to be a link between this problem and the dominance of formal analysis in teaching and assessing writing; hence, the findings of this study have clear implications for teaching instruction in this context and other similar contexts, where the implications of systemic functional grammar for language education seem to be ignored.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of related literature
    • 2.1Theoretical perspectives on modality
  • 3.Empirical findings on modality
  • 4.Purpose of the study
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Research context
    • 5.2Research data
    • 5.3Data analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Interpersonal meaning from the perspective of modality type
    • 6.2Interpersonal meaning from the perspective of modality value
    • 6.3Distribution of each type of modality orientation
  • 7.Conclusion and implications
  • References
References (32)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2016. Modality and mood in functional linguistic approaches. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 495–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Axel-Tober, Katrin & Remus Gergel. 2016. Modality and mood in formal syntactic approaches. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 473–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny & Egbert Fortuin. 2016. Modality and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 514–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bouhlal, Fatma, Marlise Horst & Juliane Martini. 2018. Modality in ESL textbooks: Insights from a contrastive corpus-based analysis. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 74(2). 227–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.). 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2011. The definition of modality. In Adeline Patard & Frank Brisard (eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality, 21–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fowler, Roger. 1986. Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ge, Tianshuang. 2015. The use of modal verbs to express hedging in student academic writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics 31. 37–46. [URL].
Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3). 322–361.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heydarnia, Roghayeh & Nader Assadi-Aidinlou. 2015. A comparative study of mood and modality in academic writing: Male vs. female authors of research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 6(6). 87–96.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse. 2004. Meta discourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karanasiou, Thaleia., & Marina Mattheoudakis. 2017. The expression of epistemic modality in Greek EFL learners’ argumentative essays. (Unpublished M.A. thesis). School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki.
Kongpetch, Saowadee & Atikhom Thienthong. 2021. Use of core modal verbs in academic writing of Thai EFL students. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies 3(1). 277–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xuyan & Chunyu Hu. 2015. Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching 8(6). 20–31.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanja. 2010. Modality in cognitive linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 879–889. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagao, Akiko. 2019. The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4(6). 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olaniyan, Kazeem K. & Adeolu Adeniji. 2015. Modality in statement of objectives in arts-based research article abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics 3(1). 42–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. R. 2001. Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qian, Li. 2017. A corpus-based study of modal verbs use in English writing by EFL learners. Canadian Social Science 13(11). 31–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica & Isabel Verdaguer. 2009. Polysemous verbs and modality in native and non-native argumentative writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Studies 91. 209–219.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shen, Qian & Yating Tao. 2021. Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE 16(3). 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vázquez, Ignacio & Diana Giner. 2008. Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21(21). 171–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, An, Shu-yuan Zheng & Guang-chun Ge. 2015. Epistemic modality in English-median medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes 381. 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Matebie, Aman, Abiy Yigzaw & Ebabu Tefera
2025. From Textbook Grammar to Real-World Language: The Story of an experiment in Language Classrooms. Corpus Pragmatics 9:3 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue