Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.30–67

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Direct quotations in the rhetorical structure of literature PhD thesis introductions

 | Keio University
 | Birkbeck, University of London
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00049.ono
Abstract
Direct quotation (DQ) use varies considerably across disciplines, from complete absence in hard sciences to relative frequency in social sciences. This study investigates DQs in literature, focusing on PhD thesis introductions in English. A corpus of 15 introductions tagged for move-and-step genre analysis was used to investigate DQ frequency, their distribution in the rhetorical structure of introductions, and source text types used for DQs. The findings show that (i) DQs are the most common source use practice in the corpus; (ii) DQs are concentrated in three rhetorical steps: reviewing previous research, presenting the analysed literary work, and making topic generalisations; and (iii) source text type used for DQs is associated with specific rhetorical steps. These findings suggest that DQs are essential for the realisation of the rhetorical purpose of the steps which carry them and for knowledge construction in literature PhD theses.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Related literature
    • 2.1Rhetorical structure of PhD thesis introductions
    • 2.2DQs in student writing
    • 2.3Types of sources
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2Identification of DQs and other source use practices
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1DQs and other source use practices in PhD thesis introductions
    • 4.2Distribution of steps and DQs
    • 4.3Quotation environment
    • 4.4Source types used for DQs
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1What is the frequency of DQs in relation to other source use practices in literature PhD thesis introductions?
    • 5.2Which rhetorical steps carry DQs in literature PhD thesis introductions?
    • 5.3What is the relationship between the steps carrying DQs and those preceding and following them?
    • 5.4What types of source texts are used for DQs in literature PhD thesis introductions?
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Ädel, Annelie & Gregory Garretson. 2006. Citation practices across the disciplines: The case of proficient student writing. In María del Carmen Pérez Llantada Auría, Ramón Plo Alastrué & Claus Peter Neumann (eds.), Academic and professional communication in the 21st century: Genres, rhetoric and the construction of disciplinary knowledge, Proceedings of the 5th International AELFE Conference, 271–280. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Afful, Joseph B. A. & Hilary Janks. 2013. The politics of citation: An analysis of doctoral theses across disciplines. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6(2). 193–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, Tony & Paul R. Trowler. 2001. Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines, 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1997. Genre-mixing in academic introductions. English for Specific Purposes 16(3). 181–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borg, Erik. 2000. Citation practices in academic writing. In Paul Thompson (ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practices, 27–45. Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bunton, David. 1998. Linguistic and textual problems in Ph.D. and M.Phil. theses: An analysis of genre moves and metatext. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University PhD thesis.
. 2002. Generic moves in PhD thesis introductions. In John Flowerdew (ed.), Academic discourse, 57–75. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. The structure of PhD conclusion chapters. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(3). 207–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chang, Peichin & Mary Schleppegrell. 2011. Taking an effective authorial stance in academic writing: Making the linguistic resources explicit for L2 writers in the social sciences. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10(3). 140–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline. 2009. Incorporating and evaluating voices in a film studies thesis. Writing & Pedagogy 11. 163–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Docherty, Peter. 2019. An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 401. 26–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudley-Evans, Tony. 1986. Genre analysis: An investigation of introductions and discussion sections of MSc dissertations. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Talking about Text, 128–145. Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Debra A. 2019. Citation as a social practice in a TESOL graduate program: A language socialization approach. Journal of Second Language Writing 441. 23–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gil-Salom, Luz, Carmen Soler-Monreal & María Carbonell-Olivares. 2008. The move-step structure of the introductory sections of Spanish PhD theses. RESLA (Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics) 211. 85–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2000. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kawase, Tomoyuki. 2018. Rhetorical structure of the introduction of applied linguistics PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 311. 18–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kushkowski, Jeffrey D., Kathy A. Parsons & William H. Wiese. 2003. Master’s and doctoral thesis citations: Analysis and trends of a longitudinal study. Libraries and the Academy 3(3). 459–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kwan, Becky. 2006. The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes 25(1). 30–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maguiro, Natalia. 2020. Citations in interdisciplinary research articles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Masumi. 2012. A genre analysis of Japanese and English Ph.D. theses in the field of literature: Macrostructure and introductory chapters. Essex: University of Essex PhD thesis.
. 2017. Move-step structures of literature Ph.D. theses in the Japanese and UK higher education. Journal of Writing Research 8(3). 469–491. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, Brian & Sue Starfield. 2007. Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for supervisors. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Change and continuity in thesis and dissertation writing: The evolution of an academic genre. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 481. 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, Diane. 2006. Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes 25(1). 4–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrić, Bojana. 2007. Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3). 238–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Legitimate textual borrowing: Direct quotation in L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 21(2). 102–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ridley, Diana. 2000. The different guises of a PhD thesis and the roles of a literature review. In Paul Thompson (ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice, 61–75. Reading: University of Reading.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Samraj, Betty. 2008. A discourse analysis of master’s theses across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(1). 55–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master’s theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(4). 299–310. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shehzad, Wasima & Akhta Abbas. 2016. Genre analysis of section headings of MPhil theses’ introduction section of linguistics & literature. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry 161. 67–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, Ling. 2004. Textual borrowing in second-language writing. Written Communication 21(2). 171–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soler-Monreal, Carmen, María Carbonell-Olivares & Luz Gil-Salom. 2011. A contrastive study of the rhetorical organisation of English and Spanish PhD thesis introductions. English for Specific Purposes 30(1). 4–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Starfield, Sue & Louise J. Ravelli. 2006. “The writing of this thesis was a process that I could not explore with the positivistic detachment of the classical sociologist”: Self and structure in New Humanities research theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(3). 222–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. 2009. Building genre knowledge. West Lafayette, Indiana: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 2001. A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of PhD theses: Macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Reading: University of Reading PhD dissertation.
. 2005. Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(4). 307–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Thesis and dissertation writing. In Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for Specific Purposes, 283–299. Boston, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Genre approaches to theses and dissertations. In Ken Hyland & Philip Shaw (eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes, 379–391. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verheijen, Lieke. 2015. The language of quoting in academic writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(1). 101–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue