Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 14:2 (2021) ► pp.203–230

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Attribution in novice academic writing

 | University of Oslo
Published online: 24 May 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00047.has
Abstract
Academic attribution, the direct acknowledgement of external sources, is investigated in two corpora of novice academic English, representing first and second language writing in linguistics. The forms and uses of attribution are analysed in a formal-functional framework. There is an overall underrepresentation of attribution in the learner corpus. However, the corpora have a similar proportional distribution of integral and non-integral attribution, but a difference in subtypes of these. Undated attributions are discussed as a special case. They occur in specific contexts, of which reference to course reading is peculiar to novice writing. Comparisons with expert corpora in Norwegian and English indicate that some, but not all, of the differences between the novice corpora may be linked to influence from the learners’ first language and culture.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
  • 3.Material and method
    • 3.1Corpora and software
    • 3.2Identification and classification of attributions
  • 4.Corpus analysis
    • 4.1Frequency and dispersion of attribution
    • 4.2Categories of attribution in the corpora
      • 4.2.1Verb-controlling attribution
      • 4.2.2Naming attribution
      • 4.2.3Non-integral attribution
    • 4.3The use of undated attribution
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The frequency of attribution in novice texts
    • 5.2Attribution types
  • 6.Closing remarks
  • Notes
  • Primary data
  • References
References (50)
Primary data
BAWE – British Academic Written English Corpus: [URL]
KIAP – Cultural Identity in Academic Prose: [URL]
VESPA – Varieties of English for Specific Purposes dAtabase, Norwegian component: [URL]
References
Ädel, Annelie. 2008. What uh the folks who did this survey found: Expert attribution in spoken academic lectures. Nordic Journal of English Studies 7 (3): 83–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. Modality in advanced learners’ written interlanguage. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung and Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 55–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borg, Erik. 2000. Citation practices in academic writing. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice, Paul Thompson (ed.). CALS, The University of Reading, 27–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics. A Practical Guide. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter-Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet. 2013. Citation from a cross-linguistic perspective: the case of French researchers publishing in English. ESP Across Cultures 101: 111–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 2006a. The construction of stance in reporting clauses: A cross-disciplinary study of theses. Applied Linguistics 27 (3): 492–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes 251, 310–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doccherty, Peter. 2018. An exploratory study in the use of direct quotation by L2 entry level Bachelor students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 401: 36–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebeling, Signe O. & Alois Heuboeck. 2007. Encoding document information in a corpus of student writing: the British Academic Written English corpus. Corpora 2 (2): 241–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2003. Bibliographical references and polyphony in research articles. In Academic discourse. Multidisciplinary approaches, Kjersti Fløttum & François Rastier (eds). Oslo: Novus, 97–119.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Dahl & Torodd Kinn. 2006. Academic Voices. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2000/2001. The integrated contrastive model. Spicing up your data. Languages in Contrast 3 (1): 95–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 2009. The contribution of learner corpora to second language acquisition and foreign language teaching: A critical evaluation. In Corpora and Language Teaching, Karin Aijmer (ed.). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins, 13–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Contrastive Interlanguage Analysis. A Reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1 (1): 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groom, Nicholas. 2000. Attribution and averral revisited: Three perspectives on manifest intertextuality in academic writing. In Patterns and Perspectives: Insights into EAP Writing Practice, Paul Thompson (ed.). Reading: University of Reading, 14–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2009. Thematic choice and expressions of stance in English argumentative texts by Norwegian learners. In Corpora and Language Teaching, Karin Aijmer (ed.). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 121–139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Stating the obvious: signals of shared knowledge in Norwegian-produced academic English. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina De Vries & Sanne Van Vuuren (eds). Presses universitaires de Louvain, 23–44Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heuboeck, Alois, Jasper Holmes & Hilary Nesi. 2010. The BAWE Corpus Manual, version 3. [URL]
Hyland, Ken. 1999. Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics 20 (3): 341–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses. Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Activity and evaluation: Reporting practices in academic writing. In Academic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed.). Harlow: Longman, 115–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Feng Jiang. 2019. Points of reference. Changing patterns of academic citation. Applied Linguistics 40 (1): 64–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Theresa Ann. 2009. Drawing a line in the sand: Identifying the borderzone between self and other in EL1 and EL2 citation practices. Assessing Writing 141: 62–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Shuguang & Klaus-Uwe Panther. 2014. ‘Author (date)’ constructions in academic discourse. English Text Construction 7 (2): 215–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mansourizadeh, Kobra & Ummul K. Ahmad. 2011. Citation practices among non-native expert and novice scientific writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10 (3): 152–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary. 2021. Sources for courses: Metadiscourse and the role of citation in student writing. Lingua 2531, 103040. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2012. Genres across the Disciplines. Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe O. Ebeling. 2013. Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research: Looking back, Moving ahead, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds). Louvain: Presses Universitaires de Louvain, 377–387.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, Jean & Jill Musgrave. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 141: 48–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, Diane. 2006. Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing. English for Specific Purposes 251: 4–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, Diane & Philip Shaw. 2012. Types of student intertextuality and faculty attitudes. Journal of Second Language Writing 211: 149–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrić, Bojana. 2007. Rhetorical functions of citations in high- and low-rated master’s theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6 (3), 238–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrić, Bojana & Nigel Harwood. 2013. Task requirements, task representation, and self-reported citation functions: An exploratory study of a successful L2 student’s writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 121: 110–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools version 6, Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1986. Fictional worlds. In Talking about Text (Discourse Analysis Monographs No. 13), M. Coulthard (ed.). Birmingham: English Language Research, University of Birmingham, 43–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers: From parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written Communication 3 (1): 118–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tadros, Angela. 1993. The pragmatics of text averral and attribution in academic texts. In Data, Description, Discourse, Michael Hoey (ed.). London: Harper Collins. 98–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Yiyun Ye. 1991. Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics 12 (4): 365–382. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul & Chris Tribble. 2001. Looking at citations: using corpora in English for academic purposes. Language Learning & Technology 5 (3): 91–105.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Paul. 2005. Aspects of identification and position in intertextual reference in PhD theses. In Strategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini-Bonelli & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds). Amsterdam: Benjamins, 31–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verheijen, Lieke. 2015. The language of quoting in academic writing. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 4 (1): 101–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemeyer, Leonie. 2019. Direct quotation in second language writing. A corpus-based study of intertextuality in academic learner English. In Learner Corpora and Language Teaching, Sandra Götz & Joybrato Mukherjee (eds). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins, 129–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Rezaee, Abbas Ali & Mohammad Mozaffari
2023. “Where got I that truth?” An analysis of external sources in English and Persian news reports on Syria. Discourse and Interaction 16:1 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue