Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 14:1 (2021) ► pp.25–67
Worlds of evidence
Visualising patterns in witness statements in the aftermath of the Hillsborough football stadium disaster
Published online: 15 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00042.can
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00042.can
Abstract
The Hillsborough football stadium disaster (1989) in Sheffield, UK, led to the deaths of 97 football fans and
resulted in the longest jury case in British legal history (2016). This article examines the witness statements of two Sheffield
residents who claim to have attended the match. Using a mixed-methods approach that incorporates a cognitive linguistic framework
(Text World Theory) with visualisation software (VUE) we consider both form and function of a number of linguistic features, such
as meta-narrative, evaluative lexis, syntax, and modality to investigate how institutional voices permeate and potentially distort
layperson narratives. Our analysis casts doubt on the veracity of the statements and raises questions about what can be
considered evidential in a forensic investigation.
Keywords: Hillsborough, modality, text world theory, VUE
Article outline
- 1.The Hillsborough disaster and the context of the V/J witness statements
- 2.Text World Theory and the notion of the textual discourse-world (tDW)
- 3.Text-worlds annotation and visualisation of the V/J statements using VUE
- 4.Analysis
- 4.1An overview of ‘worlds’
- 4.1.1Epistemically strong(er) modal-worlds
- 4.1.2Weak epistemic commitment
- 4.1.3Attitudinal modal-worlds
- 4.2The walk to the ground and the “at-issue” event in the stadium
- 4.2.1Weaker commitment
- 4.2.2Attitudinal stance
- 4.1An overview of ‘worlds’
- 5.Textual discourse-worlds
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (44)
Baldwin, James. 1993. Police
interview techniques: Establishing truth or proof? British Journal of
Criminology 33(3): 325–352.
Canning, Patricia. 2017. Text
World Theory and real world readers: From literature to life in a Belfast prison. Language and
Literature 26(2): 172–187.
. 2018. “No
ordinary crowd”: Foregrounding a “hooligan schema” in the construction of witness narratives following the Hillsborough
football stadium disaster. Discourse and
Society 29(3): 237–255.
. 2020. Retellings
in the Hillsborough witness statements. In Narrative Retellings:
Stylistic Approaches, Marina Lambrou (ed.). London: Bloomsbury, 143–161.
Coleman, Sheila, Anne Jemphrey, Phil Scraton & Paula Skidmore. 1990. Hillsborough
and After: The Liverpool Experience. Liverpool: City Council.
Coulthard, Malcolm. 2004. Author
identification, ideolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied
Linguistics 24(4): 431–447.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental
Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The
Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York NY: Basic Books.
Finegan, Edward. 2010. Legal
writing: attitude and emphasis. Corpus linguistic approaches to ‘legal language’: adverbial expression of attitude and
emphasis in Supreme Court opinions”. In The Routledge Handbook of
Forensic Linguistics, Malcolm Coulthard & Alison Johnson (eds). London: Routledge, 65–77.
Fox, Gwyneth. 1993. A
comparison of ‘policespeak’ and ‘normalspeak’: A preliminary
study. In Techniques of Description; Spoken and written discourse. A
festschrift for Malcolm Coulthard, John Sinclair, Michael Hoey and Gwyneth Fox (eds). London: Routledge, 183–195.
Gavins, Joanna. 2005. (Re)thinking
modality: A text world perspective. Journal of Literary
Semantics 341: 79–93.
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic
Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice
System. Wiley-Blackwell.
Grant, Tim & Kevin Baker. 2001. Identifying
reliable, valid markers of authorship: A response to Chaski. Forensic
Linguistics 8(1): 66–79.
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic
and conversation. In Studies in the Way of
Words. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hall, Phil. 2008. Policespeak. In Dimensions
of Forensic Linguistics, Maria Teresa Turell & John Gibbons (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 67–94.
Haworth, Kate. 2017. The
discursive construction of evidence in police interviews: Case study of a rape suspect. Applied
Linguistics 38(2): 194–214.
Ho, Yufang, Jane Lugea, Dan McIntyre, Jing Wang & Z. Xu. 2018. Projecting
uncertainty: A text-world analysis of three statements from the Meredith Kercher murder
case. English Text
Construction 11(2): 286–318.
Ho, Yufang, Jane Lugea, Dan McIntyre, Z. Xu & Jing Wang. 2019. Text-world
annotation and visualization for crime narrative reconstruction. Digital Scholarship in the
Humanities 34(2): 310–334.
Home Office
Directive. 2019. National Crime Recording
Standard. In Home Office Counting Rules for Recorded
Crime. London.
Labov, William. 1972. Language
in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky. 1967. Narrative
analysis. In Essays on the Verbal and Visual
Arts, June Helm (ed.) Seattle: University of Washington Press, 12–44. Reprinted
in Journal of Narrative and Life
History 71: 3–38, 1997.
Lea, Susan & Nick Lynn. 2012. Dialogic
reverberations: Police, domestic abuse, and the discontinuation of cases. Journal of
Interpersonal
Violence 27(15): 3091–3014.
Lugea, Jane. 2012. Building
a narrative Text-World through deixis and modality: A contrastive study of Spanish and
English. PhD dissertation, Queen’s University Belfast.
Lynn, Nick. 2008. “Doing
policing”: An inquiry into the rhetorical and argumentative skills of the police. PhD
dissertation, University of Plymouth.
Lynn, Nick & Patricia Canning. (under
review). Additions, omissions, and transformations: In institutional retellings of domestic
violence. Special issue on violence against women. Language and
Law.
Rock, Frances. 2001. The
genesis of a witness statement. Forensic Linguistics. The International Journal of Speech,
Language and the
Law 8(2): 44–72.
. 1999b. Policing
with contempt: The degrading of truth and denial of justice in the aftermath of the Hillsborough
disaster. Journal of Law and
Society 26(3): 273–297.
. 2004. Death
on the terraces: The contexts and injustices of the 1989 Hillsborough Disaster. Soccer and
Society 5(2): 183–200.
Scraton, Phil, Anne Jemphrey & Sheila Coleman. 1995. No
Last Rights: The Denial of Justice and the Promotion of Myth in the Aftermath of the Hillsborough
Disaster. Liverpool: Centre for studies in crime and social justice and Liverpool City Council.
Svartik, Jan. 1968. The
Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic
Linguistics. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg Press.
The Report of the Hillsborough Independent
Panel. 2012. Ordered by the House of
Commons. London: The Stationery Office.
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. Voices
in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports. Applied
Linguistics 17(4): 501–530.
Wang, Jing, Yufang Ho, Z. Xu, Dan McIntyre & Jane Lugea. 2016a. The
visualisation of cognitive structures in forensic
statements. In Proceedings of IV2016: 20th International conference
Information Visualisation. Lisbon, Portugal, 106–11.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Jeffries, Lesley & Dan McIntyre
Mohanty, Sanjeeb, Hemlata Sharma & Samuel Lamai
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
