Cover not available

Review published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 12:1 (2019) ► pp.143–153

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Dancygier, Barbara (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics

Reviewed by
 | Lund University
Published online: 27 May 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00022.dev
References (31)
References
Bateman, John. 2014. Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blomberg, Johan & Jordan Zlatev. 2014. Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (3): 395–418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera. 2011. How language shapes thought. Scientific American 304 (2): 62–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner. 2005. The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112 (1): 193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel. 2008. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 581: 63–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2016. Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 587–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Dagmar Divjak. 2015. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte. 2017. Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 371–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devylder, Simon & Jordan Zlatev. Forthcoming. Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the motivation and sedimentation model. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, Annalisa Baicchi & Günter Radden (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan. 2016. Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 447–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens (eds). 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. J. 2005. The psychological status of image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning, Beate Hampe (ed.). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 113–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Jennifer. 2014. Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harder, Peter. 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. 1978. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 2003. What is Language? Turku: University of Turku Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6): 15–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. 2013. Cognitive Linguistics–The Quantitative Turn: The Essential Reader. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey (ed.). 2009. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan. 1984. When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2009. Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi. In press. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication.
Steen, Gerard J. 2011. The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 2004. Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache: Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte. Theorien. Analysemethoden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 2012. Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground down. In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky. 2011. Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS one 6 (2): e16782. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2007. Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (3): 445–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2018. Mimesis theory, learning, and polysemiotic communication. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Michael A. Peters (ed.). Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Johan Blomberg. 2016. Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 185–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Zlatev, Jordan, Simon Devylder, Rebecca Defina, Kalina Moskaluk & Linea Brink Andersen
2023. Analyzing polysemiosis: language, gesture, and depiction in two cultural practices with sand drawing. Semiotica 2023:253 ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Brône, Geert
2021. The multimodal negotiation of irony and humor in interaction. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse. Constructions and Frames 13:1 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Göran Jacobsson & Liina Paju
2021. Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes. In Figurative Language - Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11], ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue