Cover not available

Article published In: English Text Construction
Vol. 11:2 (2018) ► pp.257–285

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Online conference announcements as spaces for disciplinary communication

 | Universidad de Zaragoza
Published online: 19 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00011.lor
Abstract
The aim of the study is to explore online conference announcements as sites for disciplinary communication and the way they are realized linguistically. A corpus of 50 conference announcements included in a major listserv in the field of linguistics is analysed, focusing on rhetorical structure and major interpersonal features, namely self mentions, engagement markers, modal verbs and the use of passive voice. Results show that linguistic interpersonal markers are deployed in the text according to the various communicative functions the text has and also the role played by the writer at each stage and, subsequently, the roles ascribed to readers. Moreover, it is claimed that the wide distribution of conference announcements ensured through electronic platforms reinforces the strategic role of these texts as vehicles of communication and interaction among disciplinary members.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A framework for the analysis of online conference announcements
  • 3.Corpus and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1The rhetorical structure of conference announcements in the Linguist List
    • 4.2Interpersonal markers as indicators of rhetorical structure
    • 4.3Quantitative analysis of interpersonal markers
      • 4.3.1Self mentions
      • 4.3.2Engagement markers
      • 4.3.3Modal verbs
      • 4.3.4Passive voice
  • 5.Discussion of results
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (42)
References
Anthony, Laurence. 2017. AntConc (Version 3.5.0) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 2 September 2018).
Askehave, Inger & Anne Ellerup Nielsen. 2005. Digital genres: A challenge to traditional genre theory. Information Technology and People 18 (2): 120–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauman, Marcy Lassotta. 1999. The evolution of Internet genres. Computers and Composition 16 (2): 269–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bawarshi, Anis S. & Mary Jo Reiff. 2010. Genre: An Introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. Lafayette, USA: Parlor Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berkenkotter, Carol & Thomas N. Huckin. 1993. Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 10 (4): 475–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Genre Knowledge in Disciplinary Communication: Cognition/Culture/Power. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breivega, Kjersti, Trine Dahl & Kjersti Fløttum. 2002. Traces of self and others in research articles. A comparative pilot study of English, French and Norwegian research articles in medicine, economics and linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 12 (2): 218–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, Maggie. 1999. Aspects of the author’s voice in three academic research articles. In Issues in EAP Writing Research and Instructions, Paul Thompson (ed.). Reading, UK: CALS publication, 71–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherry, Roger D. 1998. Ethos versus persona: Self-representation in written discourse. Written Communication 5 (3): 251–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crowston, Kevin & Marie Williams. 2000. Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. The Information Society 161: 201–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dimitrios, Nasiopoulos K., Damianos P. Sakas & D. S. Vlachos. 2014. Modeling publications in academic conferences. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 1471: 467–477. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, Huiling. 2007. Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes 26 (3): 368–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2004. Computer-mediated discourse analysis. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning, Sasha Barab, Rob Kling & James H. Gray (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 338–376. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Language@Internet 4 (1). <[URL]> (Last accessed on 2 September 2018).
2013. Discourse in Web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In Discourse 2.0: Language and New Media, Deborah Tannen & Anna Marie Trester (eds). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–25.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2001. Humble servants of the discipline? Self mentions in research articles. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3): 207–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Options of identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics 34 (8): 1091–1112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 131: 133–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005a. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies 7 (2): 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo & Martin Dewey. 2011. Review of developments in research into English as a Lingua Franca. Language Teaching 44 (3): 281–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Chih-Hua. 1999. The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes 18 (2): 121–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Catherine. 2014. Genre as social action (1984), revisited 30 years later. Letras & Letras 31 (3): 56–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, M. Pilar, Rosa Lorés-Sanz & Enrique Lafuente-Millán. 2010. Editorial. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9 (2): 83–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orlikowski, Wanda & Jo Anne Yates. 1994. Genre repertoire: The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (4): 541–574. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Llantada, Carmen. 2013. The article of the future: Strategies for genre stability and change. English for Specific Purposes 32 (4): 221–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Räisänen, Christine. 1999. The Conference Forum as a System of Genres. Gothenberg, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sancho-Guinda, Carmen. 2015. Genres on the move: Currency and erosion of the genre moves construct. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 191: 73–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schryer, Catherine. 1994. The lab vs. the clinic: Sites of competing genres. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman & Peter Medway (eds). London: Taylor & Francis, 105–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
St Aman, Kirk & Rich Rice. 2015. Online writing in global contexts: Rethinking the nature of connections and communication in the age of international online media. Computers and Composition 381: v–x. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Research Genres. Exploration and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Ramona & Suganthi John. 1999. The ‘I’ in identity: Exploring writer identity in student academic writing through the first person pronoun. English for Specific Purposes 18 (Supplement 1): S23–S39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thurlow, Crispin & Kristine Mroczek (eds). 2011. Introduction: Fresh perspectives on new media sociolinguistics. Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford: Oxford University Press, xix–xxxliv. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36 (1): 63–94.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 1998. Who am I/Who are we in academic writing? International Journal of Applied Linguistics 8 (2): 163–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Wenhsien. 2013. Two folded messages behind CFP: A cross disciplinary study. International Journal of Language Studies 7 (2): 83–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Call for papers”: Analysis of the schematic structure and lexico-grammar of CFPs for academic conferences. English for Specific Purposes 37 (1): 39–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Lorés, Rosa & Giuliana Diani
2021. Disseminating knowledge: the effects of digitalised academic discourse on language, genre and identity. European Journal of English Studies 25:3 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue