Cover not available

Introduction In: Evolutionary Linguistic Theory: Online-First Articles

Introduction

The nature of modality

Werner Abraham’s perspective

 | University of Trento
 | University of Bergamo
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (23)
References
Abraham, Werner (1986): Die Bedeutungsgenese von Modalpartikeln. Die bedeutungskonstituierenden Variablen: Kontrastdomäne und Kontext. Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik (GAGL) 271: 1–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1990): Die Grammatikalisierung von Auxiliar- und Modalverben. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 1121, 200–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991a): Modalverben in Germania. In: Eijirō Iwasaki (ed.), Begegnung mit dem Fremden: Grenzen — Traditionen — Vergleiche, Akten des VIII. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses, Tokyo (1990). Band 4: Sektion 4: Kontrastive Syntax, 109 — 118. München: Iudicium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991b): The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Vol. 2 (pp.331–380). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992): The aspectual source of the epistemic-root distinction of modal verbs in German. In: W. Boeder, Chr. Schroeder, K. H. Wagner and W. Wildgen (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Zeit. In memoriam Johannes Bechert. Band 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft, 231–249. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997): The interdependence of case, aspect, and referentiality in the history of German: the case of the genitive. In: A. van Kemenade and N. Vincent (eds.) Parameters of morphosyntactic change, 29–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005): Event arguments and modal verbs. In: C. Maienborn and A. Wöllstein (eds.), Event arguments: Foundations and applications, 243–276. Tübingen: M. Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006): The compositional nature of the analytic passive: Syntatic vs. event semantic triggers. “Argument hypothesis” vs. Aspect hypothesis”. In: W. Abraham and L. Leisiö (eds.), Passivization and typology: Form and function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 462–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009): Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikeln und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Modalität, Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, 251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011): ‘Traces of Bühler’s Semiotic Legacy in Modern Linguistics’. In: K. Bühler, Theory of Language. The representational function of language. Translated by Donald Fraser Goodwin. In collaboration with Achim Eschbach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins: xiii–xlvii. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012): Illocutionary force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Modality and Theory of mind elements across languages, 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014): Strong modality and truth disposability in syntactic subordination: What is the locus of the phase edge validating modal adverbials? Studia Linguistica 69/21: 119–159.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016a): Pervasive underspecification of diathesis, modality, and structural case coding: the gerund in historical and modern German. Linguistische Berichte 2481: 435–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b): Was bedeutet Subordination mit V2 im Deutschen und Niederländischen: omdat und want ebenso wie weil und denn? In: K. Feyaerts, G. Brône, S. Schoonjans, G. Stuyckens (eds.), Sprache in Raum und Geschichte, System und Kultur. Festschrift für Luk Draye (Leuvense bijdragen 99–100), 122–132. Leuven: Department of Linguistics of the University of Leuven.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017a): Modal particles and Verum focus — new corollaries. In: C. Fedriani and A. Sansò (eds.), Pragmatic markers, Discourse markers and modal particles. New perspectives, 171–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017b): Modalpartikel und Mirativeffekte. In: S. Tanaka, E. Leiss, W. Abraham & Y. Fujinawa (eds.), Grammatische Funktionen aus Sicht der japanischen und deutschen Grammatik, 75–108. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020): Modality in Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl (1934): Sprachteorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (2010). The evolution of morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele (2013): Modus und Modalverben — Kategorisierungsoptionen im grammatischen Kernbereich der Modalität. In: W. Abraham and E. Leiss (eds.), Funktionen von Modalität, 77–110. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko (2005): On defining modality again. Language Sciences 271, 165–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue