Cover not available

Review published In: Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp.239246

References (17)
References
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). All or nothing: No half-Merge and the evolution of syntax. PLOS Biology, 17 (11). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (1984). The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(2), 173–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deacon, T. W. (2003). Multilevel selection in a complex adaptive system: The problem of language origins. In B. Weber, & D. Depew (Eds.), Evolution and Learning: The Baldwin Effect Reconsidered (pp. 81–106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T. (2011). Unity and diversity in human language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 3661, 376–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Toward a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative cognition. Physics of life reviews, 11(3), 329–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). What animals can teach us about human language: The phonological continuity hypothesis. Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 211, 68–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D., & Chomsky, N. (2005). The evolution of language faculty: clarifications and implications. Cognition, 971, 179–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, T. (2020). Curbing feature coding: Strictly local feature assignment. Slides of a talk given at SCiL 2020, January 2–5, co-located with the LSA 2020.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 2981, 1569–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (2010). Your theory of language evolution depends on your theory of language. In R. K. Larson, V. Deprez, & H. Yamakido (Eds.), The evolution of human language: Biolinguistic perspectives (pp. 63–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (2001). Spontaneous evolution of linguistic structure – an iterated learning model of the emergence of regularity and irregularity. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 5(2), 102–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martins, P. T., & Boeckx, C. (2019). Language evolution and complexity considerations: The no half-Merge fallacy. PLOS Biology, 17(11). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moro, A. (2015). I confini di Babele. Il cervello e il mistero delle lingue impossibili [The Boundaries of Babel. The Brain and the Enigma of Impossible Languages.]. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2016). Monkey Morpho-Syntax and Merge-Based Systems. Theoretical Linguistics, 42 (1–2), 139–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Some thoughts about merge: Typology, labeling, freezing effects. Presentation held in Goethe University, Frankfurt, on May 4.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue