Article published In: Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp.191–228
The cycle in language change
Insights from diachronic phonology and syntax of negation
Published online: 7 May 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00042.tag
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00042.tag
Abstract
Language change can be conceptualized as a cyclical process of continuous renewal of the involved elements which
somehow change their nature, with respect to phonological or lexico-grammatical features. A crucial aspect of such diachronic
evolution is that cyclical change takes place systematically and follows regular and unidirectional patterns of development. Once
the change is complete, the same developmental path will be undertaken by new linguistic items in the same cyclical fashion. In
this paper, we illustrate the concept of cyclical change by discussing two examples of linguistic cycles. A first instance of
cyclical development is displayed at the phonological level by the diachronic changes in the obstruent consonant system taking
place from Indo-European to German through the First and the Second Sound Shift: the cycle is completed in the Cimbrian
dialects. A second instance is provided by the diachronic process known as Jespersen’s cycle (Jespersen, O. ([1917]
1966). Negation in English and Other
Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.): sentential negation, initially expressed through a single negative marker, is later reinforced by an
additional one; eventually, this second element becomes the only negative marker available in the sentence while the original
marker is deleted. The discussion of the negative cycle takes also into consideration the results of an empirical research
conducted on two varieties of an Italo-Romance dialect spoken in northern Italy.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The cycle in diachronic phonology
- 3.The cycle for sentential negation
- 3.1General outline
- 3.2Cyclical changes at NegP level
- 3.3The role of pragmatic and syntactic factors in the negative cycle
- 3.4Synchronic evidence: Cross-linguistic strategies to express sentential negation
- 3.5Sentential negation in Italo-Romance varieties: Diatopic variation in the Brescia area
- 4.Case study: The negative cycle in Lumezzane and the urban area of Brescia
- 4.1Informants
- 4.2Data analysis
- 4.2.1Indicative sentences
- 4.2.2Imperatives
- 4.2.3Protasis
- 4.2.4Subjunctive subordinates
- 4.2.5Negative concord constructions
- 4.3Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (98)
Abraham, W. (2003). Autonomous
and non-autonomous components of ‘grammatic(al)ization’: economy criteria in the emergence of German
negation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung
(STUF), 56(4), 325–365.
Ashby, W. J. (1981). The
Loss of the Negative Particle ne in French: A Syntactic Change in
Progress. Language, 57(3), 674–687.
Benincà, P. (2006). A
Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. H. Portner, Crosslinguistic
Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal
Architecture (pp. 53–86). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Benincà, P., & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic,
focus and V2: defining the CP sub-layers. In L. Rizzi, The
structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic
Structures. Volume II1 (pp. 52–75). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
(2009). Varianti
sintattiche inter- e intraindividuali nelle grammatiche
dialettali. In L. Amenta, & G. Paternostro, I
parlanti e le loro storie. Competenze linguistiche, strategie comunicative, livelli di analisi. Atti del convegno
Carini-Valderice, 23–25 ottobre
2008 (pp. 185–194). Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici.
Bernini, G. (1987). Germanic
and (Gallo-)Romance negation: an area typology. In P. Ramat, Linguistic
typology (pp. 172–178). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bernini, G., & Ramat, P. (1990). Area
influence vs. typological drift in Western Europe: the case of
negation. In J. Bechert, C. Buridant, & G. Bernini, Toward
a Typology of European
Languages (pp. 25–46). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
(1996). Negative
Sentences in the Languages of Europe. A Typological Approach. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Biberauer, T. (2009). Jespersen off course? The case of contemporary Afrikaans negation. In E. van Gelderen, Cyclical
Change (pp. 91–130). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Brinton, L., & Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalization
and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burridge, K. (1983). On
the development of Dutch negation. In H. Bennis, & W. van Lessen Kloeke, Linguistics in
the Netherlands
1983 (pp. 31–40). Dordrecht: Foris.
Cinque, G. (1976). Mica. Annali
della Facoltà di Lettere e filosofia dell’Università di
Padova, 11, 101–112.
(1999). Adverbs
and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic
perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Devos, M., Kasombo Tshibandi, M., & van der Auwera, J. (2009). Double
and triple negation in Kanincin (L53). Paper 3rd International Bantu
Conference. Tervuren 2009.
Devoto, G., & Giacomelli, G. (2002). I
dialetti delle regioni d’Italia. 3rd
edition. Milan: Bompiani.
Espinal, M. T. (1993). The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 19(4), 353–369.
Fonseca-Greber, B. B. (2007). The
Emergence of Emphatic ‘ne’ in Conversational Swiss French. Journal of French Language
Studies, 17(3), 249–275.
Frisch, S. (1997). The
change in negation in middle English: A NEGP licensing
account. Lingua, 101(1–2), 21–64.
Garzonio, J. (2019). Not
even a crumb of negation: on mica in Old Italian. In L. Franco, & P. Lorusso, Linguistic
Variation: Structure and
Interpretation (pp. 273–292). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Garzonio, J., & Poletto, C. (2015). On
preverbal negation in Sicilian and syntactic parasitism. Isogloss Special Issue on
Italo-Romance morphosyntax, 133–149.
Giannakidou, A. (1997). The
landscape of Polarity Items. PhD dissertation: University of Groningen.
Gianollo, C. (2016). Negation
and indefinites in Late Latin. Pallas. Revue d’études
antiques, 1021, 277–286.
Han, C. H., Lidz, J., & Storosheko, D. R. (2011). Variation
in negation and quantifier scope judgements in Korean. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of
the Chicago Linguistic
Society, 47(2), 65–76.
Hansen, M.-B. M. (2011). Negative
cycles and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of
Grammaticalization (pp. 570–579). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hansen, M.-B. M., & Visconti, J. (2009). On
the Diachrony of “Reinforced” Negation in French and
Italian. In C. Rossari, C. Cojocariu, C. Ricci, & A. Spiridon, Grammaticalization
and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical
Issues (pp. 137–171). Oxford: Elsevier.
(2005). Negation
in African American Vernacular English. In Y. Iyeiri, Aspects
of English
Negation (pp. 173–203). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin.
Jaberg, K., & Jud, J. (1928–1940). AIS:
Sprach-und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. Atlante linguistico ed etnografico dell’Italia e della Svizzera
meridionale. 81 vols. Zofingen: Ringier.
Jäger, A. (2008). History
of German Negation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kayne, R. (1992). Italian
Negative Infinitival Imperatives and Clitic Climbing. In L. Tasmowski, & A. Zribi-Hertz, Hommages
à Nicolas Ruwet: de la musique à la
linguistique (pp. 300–312). Ghent: Communication & Cognition.
Kiparsky, P., & Condoravdi, C. (2006). Tracking
Jespersen’s Cycle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and
Linguistic
Theory (pp. 179–197). Mytilene: Doukas.
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The
Sounds of the World’s Languages. Malden MA, Oxford: Blackwell.
Ladusaw, W. A. (1996). Negation
and polarity items. In S. Lappin, The
Handbook of Contemporary Semantic
Theory (pp. 321–341). Oxford: Blackwell.
Laka, I. (1990). Negation
in Syntax: on the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD
dissertation: MIT.
Larrivée, P. (2010). The
pragmatic motifs of the Jespersen cycle: Default, activation, and the history of negation in
French. Lingua, 120(9), 2240–2258.
Loporcaro, M., Schmid, S., Pescarini, D., Tisato, G., Donzelli, G., Negrinelli, S., & Zanini, C. (2019). AIS,
reloaded (AISr). University of Zurich. [URL]
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L. (1998). Negation
parameters and their interaction in Italian dialects. Quaderni di Lavoro
ASIS, 21, 39–60.
(2005). I
dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (vol.
3). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
(2012). On
the Lexical/Functional Divide: The Case of Negation. In L. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, & C. Poletto, Functional Heads. The Cartography of
Syntactic
Structures (pp. 338–351). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, J. (2006). Why
No(t)? Style, 40(1–2), 20–23. [URL]
Nilsen, Ø. (2003). Eliminating
Positions: Syntax and semantics of sentential
modification. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.
Osthoff, H., & Brugmann, K. (1878). Morphologische
Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Erster
Theil. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Parry, M. (1997). Negation. In M. Maiden, & M. Parry, The Dialects of Italy (pp. 179–185). London: Routledge.
(2013). Variation
and change in the presentational constructions of north-western Italo-Romance
varieties. In E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal, & M. Cennamo, Argument Structure in
Flux (pp. 511–548). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Penello, N., & Pescarini, D. (2008). Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt, 81, 43–56.
Pescarini, D. (2009). ‘Presuppositional’ Negation, Modality, and the {Addressee}. Padua Working Papers in
Linguistics, 31, 22–29.
(2022). A
Quantitative Approach to Microvariation: Negative Marking in Central
Romance. Languages, 7(2), 87.
Pescarini, D., & Donzelli, G. (2017). La
negazione nei dialetti della Svizzera italiana. Vox
Romanica, 76(1), 74–96.
Pescarini, D., & Penello, N. (2012). L’avverbio
mica fra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche. In V. Bambini, I. Ricci, & P. M. Bertinetto, Linguaggio
e cervello – Semantica, Atti del XLII Congresso internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), Pisa, 25–27
September 2008 (sez. II.B.P). Rome. Bulzoni.
Poletto, C. (2000). The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2008). Parallel
phases: a study on the high and low left periphery of Old
Italian. In M. Frascarelli, Phases
of
Interpretation (pp. 261–294). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Pollock, J. (1989). Verb
Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic
Inquiry, 201, 365–424.
(1997). Notes
on Clause Structure. In L. Haegeman, Elements
of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbook of
Linguistics (pp. 237–279). Dordrecht: Springer.
Poppe, E. (1995). Negation
in Welsh and ‘Jespersen’s Cycle’. Journal of Celtic
Linguistics, 41, 99–107.
Rabanus, S. (2018). Bilingualism
and contact-induced language change in Cimbrian: possessive constructions. Lingue e
Linguaggio, XVII(1), 55–69. [URL]
Ramat, P. (1994). Negation. In R. E. Asher, The
Encyclopedia of Language and
Linguistics (pp. 2769–2774). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Salmons, J. (2018). A
history of German. What the past reveals about today’s language. 2nd
edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sankoff, G., & Vincent, D. (1977). L’emploi
productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Français (Le) Moderne
Paris, 45(3), 243–256.
Schwegler, A. (1988). Word-Order
Changes in Predicate Negation Strategies in Romance
Languages. Diachronica, 5(1–2), 21–58.
Schweizer, B., & Rabanus, S. (2012). Zimbrischer
und Fersentalerischer Sprachatlas. Atlante linguistico cimbro e
mòcheno. Luserna: Istituto Cimbro/Palù del Fersina: Istituto Culturale Mòcheno. [URL]
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Fine-tuning
Jespersen’s Cycle. In B. Ward Birner, & G. Ward, Drawing
the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honour of Laurence R.
Horn (pp. 327–344). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Speyer, A. (2007). Germanische
Sprachen. Ein historischer
Vergleich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Vai, M. (1996). Per
una storia della negazione in milanese in comparazione con altre varietà
altoitaliane. ACME, 49(1), 57–98.
van der Auwera, J. (2009). The
Jespersen cycles. In E. van Gelderen, Cyclical
Change (pp. 35–71). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
van Gelderen, E. (2004). Grammaticalization
as Economy. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2011). The
Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language
Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Kemenade, A. (2000). Jespersen’s cycle revisited: formal properties of grammaticalization. In S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas, & A. Warner, Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms (pp. 51–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Visconti, J. (2009). From
“textual” to “interpersonal”: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica. Journal of
Pragmatics, 41(5), 937–950.
Wallage, P. (2008). Jespersen’s
Cycle in Middle English: Parametric variation and grammatical
competition. Lingua, 118(5), 643–674.
Weiß, H. (1998). Syntax
des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen
Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
(2002). A
Quantifier Approach to Negation in Natural Languages or Why Negative Concord is
Necessary. Nordic Journal of
Linguistics, 25(2), 125–153.
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic
Properties of Sentential Negation. PhD
dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.
(1997). Negation
and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Sentential
Negation. In M. Baltin, & C. Collins, The
Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic
Theory (pp. 511–535). Malden MA, Oxford: Blackwell.
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential
Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation: University of Amsterdam.
(2006). The
Ban on True Negative Imperatives. Empirical Issues in Syntax and
Semantics, 61, 405–424.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Tagliani, Marta & Jelena Živojinović
2023. Tracking Jespersen’s cycle in Veronese and Bresciano. In Different Slants on Grammaticalization [Studies in Language Companion Series, 232], ► pp. 104 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
