Cover not available

Article published In: Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp.153–190

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Inside names

A contextualist approach to the syntax and semantics of direct reference

 | University of Verona
 | University of Trieste
Published online: 7 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00041.del
Abstract
In this contribution, we offer a contextualist analysis of names whereby a name N is used as a felicitous referential term in all and only those contexts of utterance in which N is intended to refer to a unique referent by all cognitive agents that are relevant in the context. This analysis has important across-the-board virtues. It reduces the distance between common nouns and names, under the insight that names are a highly specific case of a more general phenomenon consisting in the pragmatic modulation of the meaning of common nouns. It successfully ties to an important body of syntactic evidence, and contributes to elucidate, in an original and productive manner, many of the unsolved issues concerning the syntactic structure of (complex) names. Finally, it makes a number of philosophical puzzles virtually dissolve without giving up rigid reference for names, but crucially suggesting that the causal theory of reference becomes far-fetched once the linguistic structure of names and their actual use in language and cognition have been carefully evaluated.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Some issues about rigid reference
  • Nouns and names: Semantic issues
  • Names and identity
  • Three philosophical puzzles on belief and proper names
  • Nouns and names: Syntactic issues
  • Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (28)
References
Acquaviva, P. (2019). Two studies on the internal syntax of complex names. Italian journal of linguistics, 31(2), 3–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2021). On being trivial: Grammar vs. logic. The semantic conception of logic. Forthcoming in G. Sagi and J. Woods (eds.), The Semantic Conception of Logic: Essays on Consequence, Invariance, and Meaning. Cambridge, Britain: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, C., & Postal, P. M. (2012). Imposters: A study of pronominal agreement. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresswell, M. J., & Von Stechow, A. (1982). “De Re” Belief Generalized. Linguistics and Philosophy, 503–535. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, S. (2008). Variabilism. Philosophical Review, 117(4), 525–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Del Pinal, G. (2019). The logicality of language: A new take on triviality, “ungrammaticality”, and logical form. Noûs, 53(4), 785–818. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gajewski, J. (2002). L-analyticity and natural language. Manuscript, MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). More on quantifiers in comparative clauses. Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 181, 340–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geurts, B. (1997). Good news about the description theory of names. Journal of semantics, 14(4), 319–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas-Spohn, U. (1995). Versteckte Indexikalität und subjektive Bedeutung. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1962). Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. (1968). Quantifying In. Synthèse, 19(1–2), 178–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–563). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kripke, S. A. (1979). A puzzle about belief. In A. Margalit (ed.), Meaning and Use (pp. 239–83). Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). Naming and necessity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1979). Attitudes de dicto and de se. The philosophical review, 88(4), 513–543. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(4), 609–665.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matushansky, O. (2008). On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and philosophy, 31(5), 573–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 71, 131–193. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1956). Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. The Journal of Philosophy, 531, 177–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rieppel, M. (2017). Names, masks, and double vision. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 4(8), 229–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive psychology, 8(3), 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmon, N. (1986). Frege’s Puzzle. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics, 91, 315–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1981). Indexical Belief. Synthese, 491, 129–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1987). Semantics for Belief. Philosophical Topics, 151, 177–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). Context and Content. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Fiorin, Gaetano & Denis Delfitto
2024. A contextual theory of fictional names. Intercultural Pragmatics 21:3 ► pp. 349 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue