Cover not available

Review published In: Formal Language Theory and its Relevance for Linguistic Analysis
Edited by Diego Gabriel Krivochen
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:2] 2021
► pp. 245–254

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Johan De Smedt & Helen De Cruz. The Challenge of Evolution to Religion. Cambridge, New York, Port Melbourne, New Delhi, Singapore: Cambridge University Press, 2020. . [Cambridge Elements: Philosophy of Biology]. 78 pp.

Reviewed by
 | University of Trento
Published online: 5 November 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00035.bre
References (19)
References
Boyer, P. (2002). Religion explained. The evolutionary origins of religious thought. London: VintageGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Foley, R. (1995). Humans before humanity. An evolutionary perspective. Oxford: BlackwellGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2017). The subject as cause and effect of evolution. Interface Focus, 71, 20170022. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of history. London: PenguinGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haeckel, E. (1886). The evolution of man. A popular exposition of the principal points of human ontogeny and phylogeny. New York: D. Appleton and CompanyGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jonas, H. (1987). The Concept of God after Auschwitz: A Jewish Voice. Journal of Religion, 67 (1), 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kauffman, S. (2008). Reinventing the sacred. A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelemen, D., J. Rottman, & R. Seston. (2013). Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 1421, 1074–1083. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, S. (2014). Signaling theory and technology of communication in the Palaeolithic. Biological Theory 91, 42–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landau, M. (1991). Narratives of Human Evolution. New Haven Ct: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leibowitz, Y. (1992). Judaism, human values, and the Jewish state (E. Goldman, ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monod, J. (1970). Le Hasard et la Nécessité. Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie moderne. Paris. Éditions du SeuilGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okasha, S. (2018). Agents and goals in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the conflict really lies. Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritchie, S. L. (2017). Dancing around the causal joint: Challenging the theological turn in divine action theories. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 521, 361–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tennant, F. R. (1902). The Origin and Propagation of Sin. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uexküll, J. von. (1926). Theoretical Biology. New York, London: Harcourt, Brace & Co., Kegan, Trench, Trubner & CoGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, K. (1999). God, chance, and necessity. Oxford: OneworldGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue