Cover not available

Reply published In: Biological Evolution: More than a metaphor for grammar change
Edited by Maria Rita Manzini
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1] 2021
► pp. 109121

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (31)
References
Adami, Ch. & Ofria, Ch. & Collier, T. C. (2000). Evolution of biological complexity. pnas, 97(9), 4463–4468. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buller, D. J. (2005). Adapting minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2009). Language universals and usage-based theory. In M. H. Christiansen & Ch. Collins, & Edelman, S. (Eds.). Language Universals (pp. 17–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In H.-M. Gärtner & U. Sauerland (Eds.). Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Studies in Generative Grammar (pp. 1–29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. & Reali, F. (2009). The biological and cultural foundations of language. Communicative & Integrative Biology, 2(3), 221–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 721, 741–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Neo-Teleology. In: A. Ariew & R. Cummins & M. Perlman (eds.) Functions: New Essays in Philosophy of Psychology and Biology (pp. 157–172). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Boer, Bart & Thompson, Bill & Ravignani, A. & Boeckx, C. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. Scientific Reports, 101, art. 451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (Eds.). (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures online. ([URL]).
Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. of the Royal Society London B, 2051, 581–598.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. (2000). The lying stones of Marrakech: penultimate reflections in natural history. Boston: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, H. (1991). Die menschliche Sprachfähigkeit – exaptiv und kognitiv opak. Kognitionswissenschaft, 21, 11–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). The VO-OV split of Germanic languages – a T3 & V2 production. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 19(1), 57–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). “Intelligent design” of grammars – a result of cognitive evolution. In A. Adli, G. Marco García, & G. Kaufmann (Eds.) Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches, 205–240. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Grammatiktheorien im Vintage-Look – Viel Ideologie, wenig Ertrag. In Wöllstein, A. & Gallmann, P. & Habermann, M. & Krifka, M. (eds.). Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik, 47–92. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. (2019). An anthropic principle in lieu of a “Universal Grammar”. In Brown, J. M. & Schmidt, A. & Wierzba, M. (eds.) Of trees and birds, 363–381. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, H. (2020). A null theory of Scrambling. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 39(3), 375–405. [Struckmeier, V. & Pankau, A. (eds.). Special issue on indeterminacies and mismatches in grammatical systems]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (2014). Cross-Linguistic Variation and Efficiency. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedström, P. & Stern, Ch. (2008). Rational Choice and Sociology. In S. N. Durlauf & L. E. Blume (Eds.) The new Palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 872–877). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hempel, C. G. (1959). The logic of functional analysis. In: L. Gross (Ed.) Symposium on Sociological Theory (pp. 271–307). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1965). Aspects of scientific explanation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Höfer, T. & Przyrembel, H. & Verleger, S. (2004). New evidence for the Theory of the Stork. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 181, 88–92. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1894). Progress in language; with special reference to English. London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kriengwatana, B. & Escudero, P. & Ten Cate, C. (2015). Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.-B. (1830). Philosophie Zoologique. Paris: Germer Billière. (new ed.). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leiss, E. (2000). Artikel und Aspekt. Die grammatischen Muster von Definitheit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World Inc. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Premack, D. (1985). “Gavagai!” or the future history of the animal language controversy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. Jr. (2017). Functional linguistics: Communicative functions and language structure. In M. Aronoff & J. Rees-Miller (Eds.). The Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 141–157). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue