Article published In: Biological Evolution: More than a metaphor for grammar change
Edited by Maria Rita Manzini
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1] 2021
► pp. 6–55
Position Paper
Grammar change
A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution
Published online: 2 August 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00024.hai
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00024.hai
Abstract
Structurally, cognitive and biological evolution are highly similar. Random variation and constant but blind
selection drive evolution within biology as well as within cognition. However, evolution of cognitive programs, and in particular
of grammar systems, is not a subclass of biological evolution but a domain of its own. The abstract evolutionary principles,
however, are akin in cognitive and biological evolution. In other words, insights gained in the biological domain can be
cautiously applied to the cognitive domain. This paper claims that the cognitively encapsulated, i.e. consciously inaccessible,
aspects of grammars as cognitively represented systems, that is, the procedural and structural parts of grammars, are subject to,
and results of, Darwinian evolution, applying to a domain-specific cognitive program. Other, consciously accessible aspects of
language do not fall under Darwinian evolutionary principles, but are mostly instances of social changes.
Article outline
- 1.Evolution: From metaphor to materiality
- 1.1Grammar as a cognitive-virus program
- 1.2Evolution: Disambiguating a transposed concept
- 1.2.1Evolution as metaphor
- 1.2.2Lamarckian vs. Darwinian evolution
- 1.2.3Generalized darwinism
- 2.Mechanisms of evolution in biology
- 2.1Darwinian evolution by natural selection
- 2.2Flow and drift
- 3.Elements of a (Neo-)Darwinian, cognition-based evolution of grammar
- 3.1Grammars as cognitive systems are susceptible to variation and selection
- 3.2Darwinian cognitive evolution operates on processes and structures, not on content
- 3.3Naturally selected vs. drifting
- 4.Natural selection or social change, or both
- 5.Consequences
- Speciation
- Adaptive landscape
- Convergent evolution
- Untriggered changes
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (120)
Avgustinova, T. (1997). Word order and clitics in Bulgarian. PhD Thesis. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.
Brenowitz E. A. (2008). Plasticity of the song control system in adult birds. In Ph. H. Zeigler & P. Marler (eds). Neuroscience of birdsong. 332-349. Cambridge University Press.
Bell, G. & Gonzalez, A. (2011). Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science, 332 (6035), 1327–1329.
Biberauer, Th. & Walkden, G. (2015). Introduction: Changing views of syntactic change. In Th. Biberauer & G. Walkden (Eds.), Syntax over time. Lexical, morphological, and information-structural interactions (pp. 1–13). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bierwisch, M. (2012). The Concept of Evolution in Linguistics. In A. Fasolo (Ed.), The Theory of Evolution and Its Impact (pp. 103–117). Milano: Springer.
Breslin, D. (2010). Generalising Darwinism to study socio-cultural change. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(7–8), 427–439.
Bridges, K. & Hoff, E. (2014). Older sibling influences on the language environment and language development of toddlers in bilingual homes. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35(2), 225–241.
Brinckmann, C. & Bubenhofer, N. (2012). Sagen kann man’s schon, nur schreiben tut man’s selten” – Die tun-Periphrase. In M. Konopka & R. Schneider, Grammatische Stolpersteine digital – Festschrift für Bruno Strecker zum 65. Geburtstag. Mannheim: Institut für deutsche Sprache. [URL]
Cable, S. (2008). Configurationality and the Salish language. Theoretical perspectives on languages of the Pacific Northwest. Lecture notes. U. Mass at Amherst. [URL: [URL]]
Christiansen, M. & Chater, N. (2016). The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, E62.
Chomsky, N. (2011). Language and other cognitive systems. What is special about language? Language Learning and Development, 7(4), 263–278.
Comrie, B. & Kuteva, T. (2005). The evolution of grammatical structures and ‘functional need’ explanations. In M. Tallerman (Ed.) Language origins: perspective on evolution (pp. 185–207). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Cornips, L. (1998). Habitual doen in Heerlen Dutch. In J. A. van Leuvensteijn, I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade, M. van der Wal (Eds.), DO in English, Dutch and German – history and present-day variation (pp. 83–101). Amsterdam: Stichting Nederlandistiek/Nodus Publikationen.
De Boer, B., Thompson, B., Ravignani, A. & Boeckx, C. (2020). Evolutionary dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. Nature Science Reports, 10, 451.
Darwin, Ch. (1872). On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray (6th edition).
Dehé, N. (2004). On the order of objects in Icelandic double object constructions. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 161, 85–108.
Dunn, M. (2014). Gender determined dialect variation. In: Corbett, G. G. (Ed.) The expression of gender (pp. 39–67). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Ellegård, A. (1953). The auxiliary Do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. (Gothenburg Studies in English, vol. 2). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Eldredge, N. & Gould, St. J. (1972). Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. In: Schopf, T. J. M. (Ed.) Models in Paleobiology (pp. 82–115). San Francisco: Freeman Cooper.
Feder, A. F., Kryazhimskiy, S. & Plotkin, J. B. (2014). Identifying signatures of selection in genetic time series. Genetics, 196(2), 509–522.
Foote, A. &, Liu, Y. T. & Gregg, W. (2015). Convergent evolution of the genomes of marine mammals. Nature Genetics, 47(3), 272–275.
Gazsi, D. (2011). Arabic-Persian Language Contact. In: Weninger, St. (Ed.) The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook. (pp. 1015–1021). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Gibson, E., Futrell, R., Piandadosi, St. T., Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Bergen, L. & Levy, R. (2019). How efficiency shapes human language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(5), 389–407.
Gell-Mann, M. & Ruhlen, M. (2011). The origin and evolution of word order. PNAS, 108(42), 17290–17295.
Goldin-Meadow, S., So, W. C., Özyürek, A., & Mylander, C. (2008). The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1051, 9163–9168.
Goulding, J. (2020). Virus replication. British Society for Immunology. [URL] [March 15, 2020].
Gray, T. J., Reagan, A. J., Dodds, P. S. & Danforth, C. M. (2018). English verb regularization in books and tweets. PLoS ONE, 13(12), e0209651.
Greenhill, S. J., Wu, C-H., Hua, X., Dunn, M., Levinson, St. C. & Gray, R. D. (2017). Evolutionary dynamics of language systems. PNAS, 114(42), E8822–E8829.
Haider, H. (1991). Die menschliche Sprachfähigkeit – exaptiv und kognitiv opak. Kognitionswissenschaft, 21, 11–26.
(1999). On the survival of the fittest grammar (theory). Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 181, 216–218.
(2014). The VO-OV split of Germanic languages – a T3 & V2 production. Interdisciplinary Journal for Germanic Linguistics and Semiotic Analysis, 19(1), 57–79.
(2015a). “Intelligent design” of grammars – a result of cognitive evolution. In: A. Adli, M. García García & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Variation in language: System- and usage-based approaches (pp. 205–240). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.
(2015b). Head directionality – in syntax and morphology. In: A. Fábregas, J. Mateu & M. Putnam (Eds.), Contemporary linguistic parameters (pp. 73–97). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
(2019a). An anthropic principle in lieu of a “Universal Grammar”. In: J. M. Brown, A. Schmidt & M. Wierzba (Eds.), Of trees and birds (pp. 363–381). Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
(2019b). On absent, expletive, and non-referential subjects. In: P. Herbeck, B. Pöll, & A. C. Wolfsgruber (Eds.), Semantic and syntactic aspects of impersonality (pp. 11–46). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Haider, H. & Szusich, L. (2019). Slavic languages – “SVO” languages without SVO qualities? (in press). Theoretical Linguistics, 471. (lingbuzz/004973).
Haig, D. (2007). Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biology and Philosophy, 221, 415–428.
Hanke, D. (2004). Teleology: the explanation that bedevils biology. In: Cornwell, J. (Ed.), Explanations: Styles of explanation in science (pp. 143–155). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Haspelmath, M. (1999). Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 181, 180–205.
Heath, J. (1984). Language contact and language change. Annual Review of Anthropology, 131, 367–384. Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Hodgson, G. M. (2013). Understanding organizational evolution: Toward a research agenda using Generalized Darwinism. Organization Studies, 34(7), 973–992.
(2011). Organizational Adaptation and Evolution: Darwinism versus Lamarckism? In: A. Grandori (Ed.), The Elgar Handbook of economic organization (pp. 157–171). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Hodgson, G. M. & Knudsen, Th. (2006). Why we need a generalized Darwinism and why a generalized Darwinism is not enough. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 611, 1–19.
(2008). In search of general evolutionary principles: Why Darwinism is too important to be left to the biologists. Journal of Bioeconomics, 101, 51–69.
Hull, D. L. (1988). Interactors versus vehicles. In: H. C. Plotkin (Ed.) The role of behavior in evolution (pp. 19–50). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jäger, A. (2006). Typology of Periphrastic ‘do’-constructions. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brock-meyer.
Jelinek, E. & Demers, R. (1994). Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language, 701, 697–736.
Johansson, S. (2005). Origins of Language: Constraints on hypotheses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Joseph, B. (2001). Review of R. M. W. Dixon, The rise and fall of languages. Journal of Linguistics, 371, 180–6.
Karjus, A., Blythe, R. A., Kirby, S. & Smith, K. (2020). Challenges in detecting evolutionary forces in language change using diachronic corpora. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 45.
Kiparsky, P. (2008). Universals constrain change; change results in typological generalizations. In: Good, J. (Ed.) Linguistic universals and language change (pp. 23–53). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Koonin, E. V. (2011). The logic of chance: The nature and origin of biological evolution. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: FT Press Science.
Koplenig, A., Meyer, P., Wolfer, S. & Müller-Spitzer, C. (2017). The statistical trade-off between word order and word structure – Large-scale evidence for the principle of least effort. PLOS ONE 12(3): e0173614.
Lamarck de Monet de, J.-B. P. A. (1809). Philosophie zoologique, ou, exposition des considérations relative à l’histoire naturelle des animaux. Paris: F. Savy.
Lasnik, H. &, Sobin, N. (2000). The who/whom puzzle: On the preservation of an archaic feature. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 181, 343–371.
Lee, N. (2004). The neurobiology of procedural memory. In: J. H. Schumann, S. E. Crowell, N. E. Jones, N. Lee, Sara A. Schuchert, and L. A. Wood (Eds.), The neurobiology of learning: Perspectives from second language acquisition (pp. 43–73). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lenormand, Th. (2002). Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17(4), 183–189.
Levit, G. S. & Hossfeld, U. & Witt, U. (2011). Can Darwinism be “generalized” and of what use would this be? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 211, Art. 545.
Loison, L. (2018). Lamarckism and epigenetic inheritance: a clarification. Biology & Philosophy, 33(3–4), Art. 29.
Loewe, L. & Hill, W. G. (2010). The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 3651, 1153–1167.
MacKenzie, I. (2013). Participle-object agreement in French and the theory of grammatical viruses. Journal of Romance Studies, 131,19-33.
Morgan-Short, K. & Ullman, M. T. (2011). The neuro-cognition of second language. In: S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 282–299). New York: Routledge.
Morris, S. (1994). Fleeming Jenkin and the origin of species: A reassessment. The British Journal for the History of Science, 27(3), 313–343.
Nelson, R. R. (2007). Universal Darwinism and evolutionary social science. Biology and Philosophy, 221, 73–94.
Nesensohn, E.-M. (2012). Die Tun-Periphrase in der Kindersprache. Diploma Thesis Univ. Vienna. [URL]
Newberry, M. G., Ahern, Ch. A., Clark, R. & Plotkin, J. B. (2017). Detecting evolutionary forces in language change. Nature, 551(7679), 223–226.
Orr, H. A. (2009). Fitness and its role in evolutionary genetics. Nature Reviews Genetics, 101, 531–539.
Oshima-Takane, Y., Goodz, E. & Derevensky, J. L. (1996). Birth order effects on early language development: Do second born children learn from overheard speech? Child Development, 67(2), 621–634.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peters, P. (2004). The Cambridge guide to English usage. Cambridge , UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pinker, St. & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 131, 707–784.
Reesink, G., Singer, R. & Dunn, M. (2009). Explaining the linguistic diversity of Sahul using population models. PLoS Biololgy, 7(11), e1000241.
Rispoli, M., Hadley, P. & Holt, J. (2012). Sequence and system in the acquisition of tense and agreement. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 551, 1007–1021.
Roossinck, M. J. (2011). The good viruses: viral mutualistic symbioses. Nature Review of Microbiology, 91, 99–108.
Roossinck, M. J. & Bazán, E. R. (2017). Symbiosis: viruses as intimate partners. Annual Review of Virology, 4(1), 123–139.
Rubio, L., Guerri, J. & Moreno, P. (2013). Genetic variability and evolutionary dynamics of viruses of the family Closteroviridae. Frontiers in Microbiology, 4:151.
Schoenemann, P. Th. (2012). Evolution of brain and language. In: M. A. Hofman & D. Falk (Eds.), Progress in Brain Research 1951 (pp. 443–459). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Schütze, C. (1999). English expletive constructions are not infected. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(3), 467–484.
Siewierska, A. (1996). Word order type and alignment type. STUF – Language Typology and Universals, 49(2), 149–176.
Siewierska, A. & Uhliřová, L. (2010). An overview of word order in Slavic languages. In: Siewierska, A. (Ed.) Constituent order in the languages of Europe (pp. 105–150). Berlin: Mouton DeGruyter.
Skipper, R. A. Jr. & Dietrich, M. R. (2012). Sewall Wright’s adaptive landscape: philosophical reflections on heuristic value. In: E. Svensson & R. Calsbeek (Eds.), The adaptive landscape in evolutionary biology (pp. 17–25). Oxford University Press.
Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(2), 318–343.
Solan, Z., Ruppin, E., Horn, D. & Edelman, S. (2005). Evolution of language diversity: why fitness counts. In: M. Tallerman (Ed.), Language origins: perspective on evolution (pp. 357–371). Oxford University Press.
Spielman, St. J., Weaver, St., Shank, St. D., Magalis, B. R., Li, M. & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. (2019). Evolution of viral genomes: Interplay between selection, recombination, and other forces. In: M. Anisimova (Ed.) Evolutionary Genomics: Statistical and Computational Methods (pp. 427–468). New York: Humana.
Spocter M.A., Hopkins, W.D, Garrison, A.R, Bauernfeind, A.L., Stimpson, C.D., Hof, P.R. & Sherwood C.C. (2010). Wernicke’s area homologue in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and its relation to the appearance of modern human language. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277 (1691), 2165-2174.
Stromswold, K. (1990). Learnability and the acquisition of auxiliaries. PhD Thesis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sundquist, J. D. (2012). Negative movement in the history of Norwegian: the evolution of a grammatical virus. In: D. Jonas & J. Whitman (Eds.), Grammatical change: origins, nature, outcomes (pp. 293–312). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Szyf, M. (2014). Lamarck revisited: epigenetic inheritance of ancestral odor fear conditioning. Nature Neuroscience, 171, 2–4.
Theißen, G. (2009). Saltational evolution: hopeful monsters are here to stay. Theory in Biosciences, 1281, 43–51.)
Thomason, S. G. & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21, 717–726.
Vermeer, A. (2001). Breadth and depth of vocabulary in relation to L1/L2 acquisition and frequency of input. Applied Psycholinguistics, 221, 217–234.
Voss, P., Thomas, M. E., Cisneros-Franco, J. M. & de Villers-Sidani, É. (2017). Dynamic brains and the changing rules of neuroplasticity: Implications for learning and recovery. Frontiers in Psychology, 81, 1657.
Wahlström, M. (2015). Loss of case inflection in Bulgarian and Macedonian. Doctoral Diss. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Modern Languages.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Fuß, Eric & Benjamin L. Sluckin
Abraham, Werner, Andrzej Kątny & Piotr Bartelik
Haider, Hubert & Luka Szucsich
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
