Article published In: Tracking Language Evolution as an Interdisciplinary, Cross-Theoretical Enterprise
Edited by Livio Gaeta
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 2:2] 2020
► pp. 118–126
A complex system approach to language evolution
The case of regular versus irregular verbs in English
Published online: 15 January 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00018.col
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00018.col
Abstract
Regularities in natural language systems, despite their cognitive advantages in terms of storage and learnability, often coexist with exceptions, raising the question of whether and why irregularities survive. We offer a complex system perspective on this issue, focusing on the irregular past tense forms in English. Two separate processes affect the overall regularity: new verbs constantly entering the vocabulary in the regular form at low frequency, and transitions in both directions (from irregular to regular and vice-versa) occurring in a narrow frequency range. The introduction of new verbs leads to an increase in regular types, that, entering at low frequencies, have a small impact on the perceived irregularity in terms of tokens. The frequency of usage acts as a control parameter, the majority of verbs types being fully-regular(irregular) at low(high) frequencies, with no evidence of irregularity facing extinction. Very few verbs types in an intermediate frequency region exhibit both regular and irregular forms at the same time, suggesting that the coexistence is unstable. The observed pattern of usage showing an abrupt change in response to small variations of the control parameter only appears in agent-based models provided that the word state is non-binary. By introducing this key ingredient, high-frequency irregular past-tense can survive the tendency to regularize over time, as observed in natural languages.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Rules and exceptions: The persistence of irregular forms in English verbs
- 3.Conclusions
- Notes
References
References (44)
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email: how written English evolved and where it’s heading. London; New York, NY: Routledge.
Baronchelli, A., Dall’Asta, L., Barrat, A., & Loreto, V. (2007). Nonequilibrium phase transition in negotiation dynamics. Physical Review E, 761, 051102.
Beckner, C., Ellis, N. C., Blythe, R., Holland, J., Bybee, J., Ke, J., Christiansen, M. H., Larsen-Freeman, D., Croft, W., Schoenemann, T., & Five Graces Group. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59(Suppl 1), 1–26.
Berg, Th. (1998). An Explanation from Language Processing Linguistic Structure and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Binney, J., Dowrick, N., Fisher, A., & Newman, M. (1992). The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Bromham, L., Hua, X., Fitzpatrick, Th. G., & Greenhill, S. J. (2012). Rate of language evolution and population size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 112(7), 2097–2102.
Carroll, R., Svare, R., & Salmons, J. C. (2012). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of German verbs, Journal of Historical Linguistics, 2(2), 153–172.
CELEX = Kerkman, H., Piepenbrock, R., Baayen, R. H., van Rijn, H., & Burnage, G. (1993). The Celex Lexical Database. Nijmegen: Centre for Lexical Information, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, accessible at [URL]
Chao, Y. R. (1950). Review of G. K. Zipf, Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Language, 26(3), 394–401.
Clark, R., & Roberts, I. (1993). A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry, 24(2), 299–345.
CoHA = Davies, M. (2010–). The Corpus of Historical American English: 400 million words, 1810–2009, accessible at [URL]
Colaiori, F., Castellano, C. (2015). Interplay between media and social influence in the collective behavior of opinion dynamics. Physical Review E, 921, 042815.
(2016). Consensus versus persistence of disagreement in opinion formation: the role of zealots. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2016, 033401.
Colaiori, F., Castellano, C., Cuskley, C. F., Loreto, V., Pugliese, M., & Tria, F. (2015). General three-state model with biased population replacement: Analytical solution and application to language dynamics. Physical Review E, 911, 012808.
Cook, R. S., Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2005). The World Color Survey Database. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (pp. 223–241). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Cuskley, C. F., Pugliese, M., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Loreto, V., & Tria, F. (2014). Internal and external dynamics in language: Evidence from verb regularity in a historical corpus of English, PLoS ONE, 9(8), e102882.
Cuskley, C., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Loreto, V., Pugliese, M., Tria, F. (2014). Frequency and stability of linguistic variants. In E. A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.), The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG 10), Vienna, Austria, 14–17 April 2014 (pp. 417–418). London: World Scientific.
Cuskley, C., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Loreto, V., Pugliese, M., & Tria, F. (2017). The regularity game: Investigating linguistic rule dynamics in a population of interacting agents. Cognition, 1591, 25–32.
Cuskley, C., Colaiori, F., Castellano, C., Loreto, V., Pugliese, M., & Tria, F. (2015). The adoption of linguistic rules in native and non-native speakers: Evidence from a Wug task. Journal of Memory and Language, 841, 205–223.
De Smet, I., & Van de Velde, F. (2019). Reassessing the evolution of West Germanic preterite inflection. Diachronica, 36(2), 139–180.
Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 100(3), 788–791.
Gilquin, G. (2010). Language production: A window to the mind? In H. Götzsche (Ed.), Memory, Mind and Language (pp. 89–102). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kay, P., & Regier, T. (2003). Resolving the question of color naming universals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 100(15), 9085–9089.
Lieberman, E., Michel, J. B., Jackson, J., Tang, T., & Nowak, M. A. (2007). Quantifying the evolutionary dynamics of language. Nature, 4491, 713–716.
Lightfoot, D. (1999). The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Loreto, V., Baronchelli, A., Mukherjee, A., Puglisi, A., & Tria, F. (2011). Statistical physics of language dynamics. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2011, P04006.
Loreto, V., Mukherjee, A., & Tria, F. (2012). On the origin of the hierarchy of color names. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 109(18), 6819–6824.
Lupyan, G., & Dale, R. (2010). Language Structure Is Partly Determined by Social Structure. PLoS ONE, 51, e8559.
Pijpops, D., Beuls, K., & Van de Velde, F. (2015). The rise of the verbal weak inflection in Germanic. An agent-based model. Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal, 51, 81–102.
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Puglisi, A., Baronchelli, A., & Loreto, V. (2008). Cultural route to the emergence of linguistic categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 105(23), 7936–7940.
Pugliese, M., Loreto, V., Cuskley, C., Castellano, C., Colaiori, F., Tria, F. (2014). The Role of Coordination in regularization. In E. A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.), The Evolution of Language. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG 10), Vienna, Austria, 14–17 April 2014 (pp. 417–418). London: World Scientific.
Sankoff, G. (2002). Linguistic Outcomes of Language Contact. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change (pp. 638–668). Oxford: Blackwell.
Sigurd, B., Eeg-Olofsson, M., & Van De Weijer, J. (2004). Word length, sentence length and frequency – Zipf revisited. Studia Linguistica, 58(1), 37–52.
Tria, F., Galantucci, B., & Loreto, V. (2012). Naming a structured world: A cultural route to duality of patterning. PLoS ONE, 71, e37744.
Tria, F., Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Strogatz, S. H. (2014). The dynamics of correlated novelties. Scientific Reports – Nature, 41, 5890.
Yang, Ch. (2016). The Price of Linguistic Productivity: How Children Learn to Break the Rules of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hundt, Marianne, Simone E. Pfenninger & Sandra Mollin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
