Cover not available

Article published In: Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 6:1 (2017) ► pp.65–76

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

The Dutch translation of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2007 dictionary

 | Huygens ING
 | Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences
 | Utrecht University
Published online: 26 October 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.6.1.04boo
Abstract
The words we use in everyday language reveal our thoughts, feelings, personality, and motivations. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) is a software program to analyse text by counting words in 66 psychologically meaningful categories that are catalogued in a dictionary of words. This article presents the Dutch translation of the dictionary that is part of the LIWC 2007 version. It describes and explains the LIWC instrument and it compares the Dutch and English dictionaries on a corpus of parallel texts. The Dutch and English dictionaries were shown to give similar results in both languages, except for a small number of word categories. Correlations between word counts in the two languages were high to very high, while effect sizes of the differences between word counts were low to medium. The LIWC 2007 categories can now be used to analyse Dutch language texts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The procedure of translation
  • 3.Equivalence of dictionary and translation
    • 3.1Method
    • 3.2Results
  • 4.Conclusion
  • References
References (34)
References
Balsters, M. (2013). Expression and perception of emotions. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bjekić, J., Lazarević, L. B., Živanović, M., & Knežević, G. (2014). Psychometric evaluation of the Serbian dictionary for automatic text analysis LIWCser. Psihologija, 47(1), 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boot, P. (2011). Predicting long-term activity in online writing communities: A quantitative analysis of amateur writing. Paper presented at the Supporting Digital Humanities 2011. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from <[URL]>
(2013). The desirability of a corpus of online book responses. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from <[URL]>
(2016). LIWCtools. Tools for working with LIWC dictionaries (Version 0.0.1). Retrieved 2016-09-02 from <[URL]>
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2007). The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedeler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343–359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussement, K., & Van den Poel, D. (2009). Improving customer attrition prediction by integrating emotions from client/company interaction emails and evaluating multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 361, 6127–6134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Lee, L., Pang, B., & Kleinberg, J. (2012). Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web.
Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lord, S. P., Sheng, E., Imel, Z. E., Baer, J., & Atkins, D. C. (2015). More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior therapy, 46(3), 296–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meder, T., Nguyen, D., & Gravel, R. (2015). The apocalypse on Twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, First published online: 31 January 2015. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meganck, R., Vanheule, S., Inslegers, R., & Desmet, M. (2009). Alexithymia and interpersonal problems: A study of natural language use. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 990–995. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nederlandse Taalunie. (2014). e-Lex 1.1.1 Available from <[URL]> (21 November 2015).
Nguyen, D., Gravel, R., Trieschnigg, D., & Meder, T. (2013). “How old do you think I am?”; A study of language and age in Twitter. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved 2015-12-31 from <[URL]>
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Hoste, V., & Schuurman, I. (2013). The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K. (2015). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Retrieved from <[URL]> (27 November 2015).
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M. E., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007, retrieved from <[URL]>
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., & Graybeal, A. (2001). Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Pennebaker, J. W., García, F. A., & Suriá, R. (2007). La psicología del uso de las palabras: Un programa de computadora que analiza textos en español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 24(1), 85–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Receptiviti. (2016). Enabling AI platforms with emotional intelligence. Retrieved from <[URL]> (7 April 2016).
Richardson, B. H., Taylor, P. J., Snook, B., Conchie, S. M., & Bennell, C. (2014). Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scielzo, S. A., Patel, A., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2011). Academic mentoring relationship communication processes and participant-reported effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 81.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiedemann, J. (2012). Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012).
Van der Zanden, R., Curie, K., Van Londen, M., Kramer, J., Steen, G., & Cuijpers, P. (2014). Web-based depression treatment: Associations of clients’ word use with adherence and outcome. Journal of Affective Disorders, 1601, 10–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Middendorp, H., & Geenen, R. (2008). Poor cognitive-emotional processing may impede the outcome of emotional disclosure interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 49–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, M., Horn, A. B., Mehl, M. R., Haug, S., Pennebaker, J. W., & Kordy, H. (2008). Computergestützte quantitative Textanalyse. Äquivalenz und Robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Diagnostica, 54(2), 85–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yu, B. (2014). Language and gender in congressional speech. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(1), 118–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zijlstra, H., Van Meerveld, T., Van Middendorp, H., Pennebaker, J. W., & Geenen, R. (2004). De Nederlandse versie van de ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC) [The Dutch version of ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC)] Gedrag & Gezondheid [Behaviour & Health], 321, 271–281.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zijlstra, H., Van Middendorp, H., Van Meerveld, T., & Geenen, R. (2005). Validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [Validity of the Dutch version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie [Netherlands Journal of Psychology], 60(3), 50–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (23)

Cited by 23 other publications

Kaptein, Ad A., Waldie E. Hanser, Jan W. Schoones, Peter Boot, James W. Pennebaker & Brian M. Hughes
2025. Cancer in Poetry—Poetry in Cancer: A Linguistic Analysis of Poems by Poets on Their Own Cancer and on the Cancer of Their Loved Ones. Psycho-Oncology 34:10 DOI logo
Liu, Qing & Hosung Son
2025. Text Sentiment Mining used for Constructing Investor Sentiment in Social Media: Survey and Recommendations. SAGE Open 15:1 DOI logo
Qadir, Sarvech, Mrs Ashwaq Alsoubai, Jinkyung Park, Naima Samreen Ali, Munmun De Choudhury & Pamela Wisniewski
2025. Triaging Casual from Critical: Leveraging Machine Learning to Detect Self-Harm and Suicide Risks for Youth on Social Media (Preprint). JMIR Mental Health DOI logo
Gil-Clavel, Sofia & Clara H. Mulder
2024. Does Twitter Data Mirror the European North–South Family Ties Divide? A Comparative Analysis of Tweets About Family. Population Research and Policy Review 43:4 DOI logo
Hanser, Waldie E., Ruth E. Mark & Ad J. J. M. Vingerhoets
2024. Music and Lyric Characteristics of Popular Dutch Funeral Songs. OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying 89:2 ► pp. 452 ff. DOI logo
Oliseenko, Valerii D., Shamil R. Hastiev & Tatiana V. Tulupyeva
2023. Big Five: What User Posts Say?. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Scientific Conference “Intelligent Information Technologies for Industry” (IITI’23) [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 776], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
van’t Riet, Jonathan & Mariska Kleemans
2023. What drives selection of online children’s news articles?. Journalism 24:1 ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Wäckerle, Jens & Bruno Castanho Silva
2023. Distinctive Voices: Political Speech, Rhetoric, and the Substantive Representation of Women in European Parliaments. Legislative Studies Quarterly 48:4 ► pp. 797 ff. DOI logo
Creten, Silke, Priscilla Heynderickx & Sylvain Dieltjens
2022. The Stigma Toward Dementia on Twitter: A Sentiment Analysis of Dutch Language Tweets. Journal of Health Communication 27:10 ► pp. 697 ff. DOI logo
Kučera, Dalibor & Matthias R. Mehl
2022. Beyond English: Considering Language and Culture in Psychological Text Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Liang, Lin & Shasha Wang
2022. Spanish Emotion Recognition Method Based on Cross-Cultural Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Abdo, Muhammad S, Ali S Alghonaim & Bacem A Essam
2021. Public perception of COVID-19’s global health crisis on Twitter until 14 weeks after the outbreak. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3 ► pp. 509 ff. DOI logo
Dudău, Diana Paula & Florin Alin Sava
2021. Performing Multilingual Analysis With Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). An Equivalence Study of Four Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Dudău, Diana Paula & Florin Alin Sava
2022. The development and validation of the Romanian version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (Ro-LIWC2015). Current Psychology 41:6 ► pp. 3597 ff. DOI logo
Sender, Gisela, Flavio Carvalho & Gustavo Guedes
2021. The Happy Level: A New Approach to Measure Happiness at Work Using Mixed Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20 DOI logo
Smink, Wouter A. C., Anneke M. Sools, Marloes G. Postel, Erik Tjong Kim Sang, Auke Elfrink, Lukas B. Libbertz-Mohr, Bernard P. Veldkamp & Gerben J. Westerhof
2021. Analysis of the Emails From the Dutch Web-Based Intervention “Alcohol de Baas”: Assessment of Early Indications of Drop-Out in an Online Alcohol Abuse Intervention. Frontiers in Psychiatry 12 DOI logo
Xu, Xiaoxu
2021. Development Method of Japanese Translation Teaching Assistant Platform Based on Information Technology. In Application of Intelligent Systems in Multi-modal Information Analytics [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1234], ► pp. 508 ff. DOI logo
Barnard, M.P., S. Pampel, G. Burnett, H.A. Allen & P. Chapman
2020. How do drivers recall positive and negative driving events? A quantitative approach to analysing driving diaries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 69 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
SAMSUL ARİFİN, Samsul Arifin, Heri RETNAWATİ, Jefri MAİLOOL & Himawan PUTRANTA
2020. The factors that influence of reading ability the Hijaiyah alphabet on pre-school children. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 8:2 ► pp. 667 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhe, Chun-Hua Wu, Qing-Biao Li, Bo Yan & Kang-Feng Zheng
2020. Encoding Text Information with Graph Convolutional Networks for Personality Recognition. Applied Sciences 10:12 ► pp. 4081 ff. DOI logo
Bogaard, Glynis, Joyce van der Mark, Ewout H. Meijer & Nicholas D. Duran
2019. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions. PLOS ONE 14:12 ► pp. e0226257 ff. DOI logo
van der Zanden, Tess, Alexander P. Schouten, Maria Mos, Chris van der Lee & Emiel Krahmer
2019. Effects of Relationship Goal on Linguistic Behavior in Online Dating Profiles: A Multi-Method Approach. Frontiers in Communication 4 DOI logo
Kleinberg, Bennett, Lara Warmelink, Arnoud Arntz & Bruno Verschuere
2018. The first direct replication on using verbal credibility assessment for the detection of deceptive intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 32:5 ► pp. 592 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue