Cover not available

Article published In: Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2016) ► pp.126–144

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Talking about health messages

The relationship between perceived complexity, processing time, and conversational intentions

 | University of Groningen
Published online: 23 February 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.5.2.02don
Interpersonal communication has been shown to influence health campaign outcomes, but little is known about ways in which conversations can actually be elicited. In this correlational study, we tested the assumption that perceived complexity of the message can be a predictor of interpersonal communication. Forty participants were exposed to six different health messages varying in perceived complexity. The results show that the more the message was perceived as complex, the longer it took to understand it. Longer message processing times, in turn, were associated with higher intentions to talk, but only about messages that were of low personal relevance. When messages had a high personal relevance, longer processing times were associated with lower intentions to talk. Apparently, if a message is clearly relevant, longer processing due to perceived complexity is detrimental to the occurrence of interpersonal communication.
References (38)
Barthes, R. (1975). The pleasure of the text. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Botta, R.A., & Pingree, S. (1997). Interpersonal communication and rape: Women acknowledge their assaults. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 2(3), 197–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cho, H., & Salmon, C.T. (2007). Unintended effects of health communication campaigns. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 293–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cline, R.W., Johnson, S.J., & Freeman, K.E. (1992). Talk among sexual partners about AIDS: Interpersonal communication for risk reduction or risk enhancement? Health Communication, 4(1), 39–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunlop, S.M., Kashima, Y., & Wakefield, M. (2010). Predictors and consequences of conversations about health promoting media messages. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 518–539. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, W.D., Davis, K.C., Silber-Ashley, O., & Khan, M. (2012). Effects of media messages on parent-child sexual communication. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 17(5), 498–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frank, L.B., Chatterjee, J.S., Chaudhuri, S.T., Lapsansky, C., Bhanot, A., & Murphy, S.T. (2012). Conversation and compliance: Role of interpersonal discussion and social norms in public communication campaigns. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 17(9), 1050–1067. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geary, C.W., Burke, H.M., Castelnau, L., Neupane, S., Sall, Y.B., Wong, E., & Tucker, H.T. (2007). MTV’s “Staying Alive” global campaign promoted interpersonal communication about HIV and positive beliefs about HIV prevention. AIDS Education and Prevention, 19(1), 51–67. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, H., de Bruijn, G.-J., & Van den Putte, B. (2012). Talking about alcohol consumption: Health campaigns, conversational valence, and binge drinking intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17(4), 843–853. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hendriks, H., Van den Putte, B., de Bruijn, G.-J., & de Vreese, C.H. (2014). Predicting health: The interplay between interpersonal communication and health campaigns. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 19(5), 625–636. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeken, H. (2005). Overtuigende taal. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 27(2), 139–150.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoeken, H., Swanepoel, P., Saal, E., & Jansen, C. (2009). Using message form to stimulate conversations: The case of tropes. Communication Theory, 19(1), 49–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hollemans, E. (2005, January 18). LoveLife gets attitude. Mail & Guardian Online from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornik, R.C., & Yanovitzky, I. (2003). Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: The case of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Communication Theory, 13(2), 204–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, C., & Janssen, I. (2010). Talk about it: The effects of cryptic HIV/AIDS billboards. Communicatio: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 36(1), 130–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubinga, E., Schulze, M., Jansen, C., & Maes, A. (2010). HIV/AIDS messages as a spur for conversation among young South Africans? African Journal of AIDS Research, 9(2), 175–185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubinga, E., & Jansen, C. (2011). ‘No ’til we know.’ Fela ba a tseba naa? Using African languages to communicate about HIV and AIDS to young South Africans. Communicatio; South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 37(3), 466–481.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lubinga, E., Jansen, C., & Maes, A. (2014). ‘If you care, do not share’. Exploring effects of using rhetorical figures in HIV and AIDS messages on young South Africans’ willingness to engage in conversations. Communicatio; South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research, 40(1), 49–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matos, C.A., & Rossi, C.A.V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, E.F., & Mick, D.G. (1996). Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, S.E. (2009). The intersection of conversation, cognitions, and campaigns: The social representation of organ donation. Communication Theory, 19(1), 29–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morton, T.A., & Duck, J.M. (2006). Enlisting the influence of others: Alternative strategies for persuasive media campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(2), 269–296. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(3), 211–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social representations and social explanations: From the “naïve” to the “amateur” scientist. In M. Hewstone (Ed.), Attribution theory (pp. 48–125). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Heesacker, M. (1981). The use of rhetorical questions in persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(5), 847–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rimé, B., Mesquita, B., Philippot, P., & Boca, S. (1991). Beyond the emotional event: Six studies on the social sharing of emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 5(5-6), 436–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritson, M., & Elliot, R. (1999). The social uses of advertising: An ethnographic study of adolescent advertising audiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(3), 260–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robbins, D. (2010). Beyond the billboards: The loveLife story. Johannesburg: Porcupine Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sopory, P., & Dillard, J.P. (2002). The persuasive effects of metaphor: A meta-analysis. Human Communication Research, 28(3), 382–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Southwell, B.G., & Yzer, M.C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. In C. Beck (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 31 (pp. 419–462). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surkan, P.J., DeJong, W., Herr-Zaya, J.M., Rodriguez-Howard, M., & Fay, K. (2003). A paid radio advertising campaign to promote parent-child communication about alcohol. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 8(5), 489–495. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. (1992). The pun in advertising: A pragmatic approach. Lingua, 87(1-2), 91–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B.V., Wieling, M., & Baayen, R.H. (2014). Vowel articulation affected by word frequency. Proceedings of the 10th international seminar on speech production , Cologne, May 5-8, 429–432.
Van den Putte, B., Yzer, M., Southwell, B.G., de Bruijn, G., & Willemsen, M.C. (2011). Interpersonal communication as an indirect pathway for the effect of antismoking media content on smoking cessation. Journal of Health Communication: International Perspectives, 16(5), 470–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yeshua-Katz, D., & Martins, N. (2013). Communicating stigma: The pro-ana paradox. Health Communication, 28(5), 499–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue