Cover not available

Article published In: Current Visions of TAML2: Tense, Aspect and Modality in Second Languages
Edited by Paz González and Tim Diaubalick
[Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:1] 2019
► pp. 24–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Task and L1 effects

Dutch students acquiring the Spanish past tenses

 | Leiden University
 | University of Wuppertal
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 11 March 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19017.dia
Abstract
Research on tense-aspect phenomena has shown that the type of experimental task can affect the performance of L2 learners. This pilot study on the understudied language combination Dutch-Spanish investigates this issue by focusing on the interaction between known affecting variables (inherent aspect; L1 effects) and different tasks (multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blanks, free production). First findings show that, indeed, both task type and L1 have an influence on the outcome. Generally, Dutch learners seem to prefer the Imperfect over the Preterit. This stands in contrast to previous research but can be explained by the imperfective features of the Dutch Simple Past with which the learners associate the L2 forms. Whereas this L1 effect is not visible in the multiple-choice task where the choice is forced, it manifests itself in tasks where students can choose freely between forms they know. Especially in the free production task, the L1 effect interacts with a high individual variability.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction & background
  • 2.Aspectual contrasts in Spanish and Dutch
    • 2.1Spanish tense-aspect system
    • 2.2Dutch tense-aspect system
  • 3.State of the art
  • 4.Research question and specific hypotheses
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Experimental materials
    • 5.3Data collection
  • 6.Analysis and results
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (36)
References
Andersen, R. W. (1986). El desarrollo de la morfología verbal en el español como segundo idioma. In J. Meisel (Ed.), Adquisición del lenguaje – aquisicao da linguagem (pp. 115–138). Frankfurt am Main: Klaus-Dieter Vervuert Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Y. Shirai. (1996). The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In B. Lauter, & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borik, O., González, P., & Verkuyl, H. (2004). Comparing tense systems: The primacy of the present-past opposition. In A. Dahl, K. Bentzen, & P. Svenonius (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, vol. 13.1 (pp. 13–29). Tromsø: Tromssø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., & Vos, R. (2015). Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and verb phrases, Vol. 1. Comprehensive grammar resources. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camps, J. (2005). The emergence of the imperfect in Spanish as a foreign language: The association between imperfective morphology and state verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 431, 163–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comajoan, L. (2014). Tense and aspect in second language Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.). The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 7235–7252). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T. (2019). La adquisición del sistema verbal español por aprendices alemanes y el papel del aspecto gramatical. Una comparación entre los tiempos del pasado y los tiempos del futuro. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2017). L1 effects as manifestation of individual differences in the L2 acquisition of the Spanish tense-aspect system. In K. Bellamy, M. Child, P. González, A. Muntendam, & M. C. Parafita Couto (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World (pp. 9–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P. (2019). The strength of L1 effects on tense and aspect: How German learners of L2 Spanish deal with acquisitional problems. Language Acquisition, 26(3), 282–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M. J., Michell, R., & Myles, F. (2013). The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., Arche, M. J., & Myles, F. (2017). Spanish imperfect revisited: Exploring L1 influence in the reassembly of imperfective features onto new L2 forms. Second Language Research, 33(4). 431–457. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02), 141–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, P. (2003). Aspects on aspect: Theory and applications of grammatical aspect in Spanish. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Research design: A two-way predicational system is better than a four-way approach. In M. R. Salaberry, L. Comajoan (Eds.). Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 159–186). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, P., & Diaubalick, T. (in press). Subtle differences, but rigorous implications: German and Dutch representation of tense-aspect features. Evidence from SLA. In G. De Vogelaer, D. Koster, & T. Leuschner (Eds.), German and Dutch in contrast: Synchronic, diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter.
González, P., & Verkuyl, H. (2017). A binary approach to Spanish tense and aspect: On the tense battle about the past. Borealis-An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 6(1). 97–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González, P., & Quintana Hernandez, L. (2018). Inherent aspect and L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect. The Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 611–625. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonzalez, P., Jara Yupanqui, M., & Kleinherenbrink, C. (2019). The microvariation of the Spanish perfect in three varieties. Isogloss. A journal on variation of Romance and Iberian languages, 4(1), 115–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haßler, G. (2016). Temporalität, Aspektualität und Modalität in romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McManus, K. (2015). L1-L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 71(2), 51–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Salaberry, R. (2003). The development of tense/aspect morphology in Spanish as a second language. In B. A. Lafford, & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 47–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, G., & Veiga, A. (1999). El tiempo verbal. Los tiempos simples. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 21 (pp. 2902–2903). Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2003). Tense aspect in verbal morphology. Hispania, 86(3), 559–573. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R., & Ayoun, D. (2005). The development of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In M. R. Salaberry, & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, S. A., & Torres Cacoullos, R. (2008). Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 201, 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W. (1995). The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71(4), 743–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Hout, A. (2005). Past tense interpretations in Dutch. In H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huijbregts, U. Kleinhenz, & J. Koster (Eds.). Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics: Vol. 641. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (2007). Some effects of aspect on tense construal. Lingua, 117(2), 464–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Sánchez‐Gutiérrez, Claudia, Sophia Minnillo, Ana Ortega Pérez & Ana Ruiz‐Alonso‐Bartol
2025. Does order of instruction matter? A language program intervention for preterite‐imperfect learning. Foreign Language Annals 58:3 ► pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Minnillo, Sophia, Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Ana Ruiz-Alonso-Bartol, Emily Morgan & Carmen González Gómez
2024. Predictors of accuracy in L2 Spanish preterit-imperfect production. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Salaberry, M. Rafael
2024. Thirty years of studying lexical aspect in L2 acquisition: Moving towards an expansive research agenda. Ampersand 13 ► pp. 100185 ff. DOI logo
Diaubalick, Tim & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2023. Consequences of the comparative fallacy for the acquisition of grammatical aspect in Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:4 ► pp. 1301 ff. DOI logo
González, Paz & Carmen Kleinherenbrink
2021. Target Variation as a Contributing Factor in TAML2 Production. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue