Article published In: CLIL and Bilingual Education in the Netherlands
Edited by Tessa Mearns and Rick de Graaff
[Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 7:2] 2018
► pp. 264–273
Current research on CLIL and bilingual education in the Netherlands
A discussion
Published online: 10 January 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.00003.rum
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.00003.rum
Abstract
The contribution at hand provides a discussion of the six articles in this special issue on bilingual education
and CLIL. It does so against the background of recent conceptual and empirical insights and the author’s perspective as an
“outsider from the inside”, i.e. as a visitor to Dutch CLIL schools, a CLIL researcher and part-time teacher at a German CLIL
school. The studies and resulting suggestions presented in this volume mark the way forward to a more efficient and effective CLIL
practice in the Netherlands and beyond. At the same time, it becomes clear that there are still many open questions and issues to
be looked into as CLIL is an intricate and challenging and endeavour for teachers, students, researchers and educational policy
alike.
Keywords: CLIL, bilingual, education, empirical research, language education
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Why bilingual education and CLIL research is in high demand
- 2.Discussion of the contributions
- 3.Conclusion: CLIL as the cornerstone of a major overhaul for education?
References
References (21)
Anéla. (2018). Symposium: Processes and outcomes of content and language integrated learning in the Netherlands. Presented at the Anéla Applied Linguistics Conference 2018, Egmond aan Zee.
Berliner, D. C. (2002). Educational research: The hardest science of all. Educational Researcher, 31(8), 18–20.
Bonnet, A. (2012). Towards an evidence base of CLIL: How to integrate qualitative and quantitative as well as process, product and participant perspectives in CLIL research. International CLIL Research Journal, 4(1), 66–78.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 182–204.
Eurydice. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) at school in Europe. Brussels: Eurydice European Unit. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Fleckenstein, J. (2018). All good things come in threes: Learning a third language in dual immersion. Presentation at the Bilingual Education Research Conference, Berlin, Germany, 30–31 August.
Fleckenstein, J., Möller, J., & Baumert, J. (2018). Mehrsprachigkeit als Ressource: Kompetenzen dual-immersiv unterrichteter Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Drittsprache Englisch. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21(1), 97–120.
Kultusministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (1995). Empfehlungen für den bilingualen deutsch-englischen Sachfachunterricht. Sekundarstufe I: Erdkunde. Frechen: Ritterbach.
Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. English Language Teaching Journal, 64(4), 367–375.
Leisen, J. (2015). Fachliches und sprachliches Lernen im sprachsensiblen Fachunterricht. In J. Drumbl, & A. Hornung (Hrsg.), Beiträge der XV. Internationalen Tagung der Deutschlehrerinnen und Deutschlehrer: Band 1 (Hauptvorträge). IDT 2013 (pp. 249–274). Bozen: BUPress. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Marsh, H. W. (1987). The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(3), 280–295.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Halbach, A., Schuck, K., & Ting, T. (2015). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 41–57.
Meyer, O., & Coyle, D. (2017). Pluriliteracies teaching for learning: Conceptualizing progression for deeper learning in literacies development. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 418.
Meyer, O., Coyle, D., Imhof, M., & Connolly, T. (2018). Beyond CLIL: Fostering student and teacher engagement for personal growth and deeper learning. In Martínez Agudo, Juan de Dios (Ed.), Emotions in second language teaching. Theory, research and teacher education (pp. 277–297). New York, NY: Springer.
Morton, T., & Llinares, A. (2017). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL). Type of programme or pedagogical model? In A. Llinares & T. Morton (Eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pérez-Cañado, M. L. (2012). CLIL research in Europe: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 315–341.
Rumlich, D. (2009). The impact of bilingual teaching on students’ accuracy – A case study (Unpublished state examination dissertation). University of Duisburg-Essen.
(2016). Evaluating bilingual education in Germany: CLIL students’ general English proficiency, EFL self-concept and interest. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
(2018). Englischnoten und globale englische Sprachkompetenz in bilingualen Zweigen. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 21(1), 29–48.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Mearns, Tessa & Nivja de Jong
2021. Sketching a motivational landscape. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 9:1 ► pp. 85 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
