Cover not available

Article published In: Digital Translation
Vol. 12:2 (2025) ► pp.179–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Industry watch

A digital sociology of interpreting

Charting the digital turn in interpreting studies

ORCiD logo with link | Universitat Jaume I
ORCiD logo with link | Universitat Jaume I
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Universitat Jaume I.

Published online: 27 May 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.25011.mon
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • References
References (90)
References
Acemoglu, Daron, and James Robinson. 2012. Why Nations Fail. The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angelelli, Claudia V. 2015. “Invisibility.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited by Franz Pöchhacker, 214–215. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1968 (2007). Illuminations. Translated by Harry Zohn. Edited by Hannah Arendt. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1972. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique, précédée de trois études d’ethnographie kabyle. Geneva: Droz. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. 1993. La Misère du monde. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandt, John, Kathleen Buckingham, Cody Buntain, Will Anderson, Sabin Ray, John-Rob Pool, and Natasha Ferrari. 2020. “Identifying Social Media User Demographics and Topic Diversity with Computational Social Science: A Case Study of a Major International Policy Forum.” Journal of Computational Social Science 3(1): 167–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Sabine. 2024. “Distance Interpreting as a Professional Profile.” In Handbook of the Language Industry, edited by Gary Massey, Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, and Erik Angelone, 449–472. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Aviva. 2021. Central America’s Forgotten History: Revolution, Violence, and the Roots of Migration. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1989. Necessary Illusions: Thought Control in Democratic Societies. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Randall. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Criado Perez, Caroline. 2019. Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cronin, Michael, and Carmen Delgado-Luchner. 2021. “Escaping the Invisibility Trap.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal 1(1): 91–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1949. Le deuxieme sexe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diaz Fouces, Óscar, and Esther Monzó-Nebot, eds. 2010. Applied Sociology in Translation Studies / Sociologia aplicada a la traducció. Special issue of Monti 21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul. 1997. “Culture and Cognition.” Annual Review of Sociology 231: 263–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donovan, Clare, and Cecilia Manzoni. 2024. “Remote Interpreting: A Game-changer for Interpreters?” The Interpreters’ Newsletter 291: 1–29.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fantinuoli, Claudio, and Vorya Dastyar. 2022. “Interpreting and the Emerging Augmented Paradigm.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal 2(2): 185–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fantinuoli, Claudio. 2018. “Interpreting and Technology: The Upcoming Technological Turn.” In Interpreting and Technology, edited by Claudio Fantinuoli, 1–12. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 2013. Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis. London: Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García-González, Marta. 2025. “Gender Vias in Translation Automation: Addressing Bias and Inequality.” In The Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, 96–122. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gentile, Paola. 2014. “The Conflict Between Interpreters’ Role and Status: A Socio-historical Perspective.” In (Re)visiting Ethics and Ideology in Situations of Conflict, edited by Carmen Valero-Garcés, 195–204. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 2012. “Institutionalization of Translation Studies.” In Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Yves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 73–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 2014. “Moral Injury and the Ethic of Care: Reframing the Conversation about Differences.” In “Democratic Citizenship and the Recognition of Cultural Differences,” edited by Carol Gould, Adam Etinson, and Joshua Keton. Special issue, Journal of Social Philosophy 45(1): 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giustini, Deborah. 2018. Towards a Sociology of Interpreting: The Embedded Strangers. PhD thesis, University of Manchester.
. 2024a. “Towards a Sociological Redressing of Interpreters’ (In)visibility?” In Beyond the Translator’s Invisibility. Critical Reflections and New Perspectives, edited by Peter J. Freeth and Rafael Treviño, 95–115. Leuven: Leuven University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024b. “‘You Can Book an Interpreter the Same Way You Order Your Uber’: (Re)interpreting Work and Digital Labour Platforms.” Perspectives 32(3): 441–459. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024c. “Women’s Challenges and Gender Inequality Implications in the UK Home Office’s Streamlined Asylum Process: A Practice-Based Posthuman Perspective.” Just. Journal of Language Rights & Minorities, Revista de Drets Lingüístics i Minories 3(2): 119–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giustini, Deborah, and Vorya Dastyar. 2024. “Critical AI Literacy (CAIL) for Interpreting in the Age of AI.” Interpreting and Society: An Interdisciplinary Journal 4(2): 196–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hammond, Matt. 1995. “A New Wind of Quality for Europe: Implications of the Court Case Cited by Holz-Mänttäri for the U.S. Translation Industry.” In Translation and the Law, edited by Marshall Morris, 233–245. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Byun-Chul. 2010. Müdigkeitsgesellschaft. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Byung-Chul. 2014. Psychopolitik: Neoliberalismus und die neuen Machttechniken. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Wissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hine, Christine. 2005. Virtual Methods. Issues in Social Research on the Internet. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Elaine. 2015. “Healthcare Interpreting.” In Routledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited by Franz Pöchhacker, 177–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inghilleri, Moira, ed. 2005. Bourdieu and the Sociology of Translation and Interpreting. Special issue of The Translator 11(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kalleberg, Arne L. 2011. Good Jobs, Bad Jobs: The Rise of Polarized and Precarious Employment Systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Ann H., and Javier Lezaun. 2017. “The Wild Indoors: Room-spaces of Scientific Inquiry.” Cultural Anthropology 32(3): 367–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lupton, Deborah. 2015. Digital Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marres, Noortje. 2017. Digital Sociology: The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McDonough Dolmaya, Julie. 2024. Digital Research Methods for Translation Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellinger, Christopher D. 2024. “Institutional Data in Language Industry Studies: Questions of Access, Confidentiality, and Epistemology.” In Critical Approaches to Institutional Translation and Interpreting: Challenging Epistemologies, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and María Lomeña-Galiano, 29–49. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlini, Raffaela, and Roberta Favaron. 2005. “Examining the ‘Voice of Interpreting’ in Speech Pathology.” Interpreting 7(2): 263–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Michelle N., John Basl, David Choffnes, Christo Wilson, and David M. J. Lazer. 2023. “Enhancing the Ethics of User-Sourced Online Data Collection and Sharing.” Nature Computational Science 3 (8): 660–664. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mikkelson, Holly M. 1999. “The Professionalization of Community Interpreting.” Journal of Interpretation 61: 119–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milgram, Stanley, Hilary Liberty, Raymond Toledo, and Joyce Blacken. 1986. “Response to Intrusion in Waiting Lines.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(4): 683–689. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1959 [2000]. The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monzó-Nebot, Esther. 2018. “Translators and Interpreters as Agents of Diversity. Managing Myths and Pursuing Justice in Postmonolingual Societies.” In Translating Justice in a Postmonolingual Age, edited by Esther Monzó Nebot and Juan Jiménez-Salcedo, 9–34. Wilmington: Vernon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2024. “Remote Interpreting and the Politics of Diversity: The Lived Experiences of LGBTIQ+ Interpreters in International Organizations.” In Gendered Technology in Translation and Interpreting: Centering Rights in the Development of Language Technologies, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, 94–123. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2025a. “In Different Voices: The Roles of Public Machine Translation Studies.” In The Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, 176–205. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2025b. “The Cultural Roots of Translation Automation: Revealing Ideologies in Machine Translation.” In The Social Impact of Automating Translation: An Ethics of Care Perspective on Machine Translation, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, 12–37. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. “The Language Justice Movement.” In Elgar Concise Encyclopedia of Law and Language, edited by Karen McAuliffe and Javier Moreno-Rivero. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Monzó-Nebot, Esther, and Sara Elizabeth “Elle” Dowd. 2024. “Interpreters Manterrupted: The Relevance of Gender in Court Interruption Patterns.” In Critical Approaches to Institutional Translation and Interpreting: Challenging Epistemologies, edited by Esther Monzó-Nebot and María Lomeña-Galiano, 139–163. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monzó-Nebot, Esther, and Vicenta Tasa-Fuster, eds. 2024. Gendered Technology in Translation and Interpreting: Centering Rights in the Development of Language Technology. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morozov, Evgeny. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolini, Davide. 2009. “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies 30(12): 1391–1418. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panai, Enrico. 2023. “The Latent Space of Data Ethics.” AI & Society 391: 2647–2665. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pöchhacker, Franz. 2024. “Is Machine Interpreting Interpreting?” Translation Spaces. Online First. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rakow, Lana F. 1988. “Gendered Technology, Gendered Practice.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5(1): 57–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory 5(2): 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenblat, Alex, and Luke Stark. 2016. “Algorithmic Labor and Information Asymmetries: A Case Study of Uber’s Drivers.” International Journal of Communication 101: 3758–3784.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Edited by Gail Jefferson: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1943. L’être et le néant. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 1996. Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and How It Changes. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. 1776 (1998). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spiel, Katta, and Robin Angelini. 2022. “Expressive Bodies Engaging with Embodied Disability Cultures for Collaborative Design Critiques.” In Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’22). New York: ACM. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Susskind, Richard, and Daniel Susskind. 2022. The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varoufakis, Yanis. 2020. Another Now: Dispatches from an Alternative Present. London: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Technofeudalism. What Killed Capitalism. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wadensjö, Cecilia. 1998. Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wajcman, Judy. 2004. Technofeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The Modern World-System. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, Lena. 2020. “The Three Harms of Gendered Technology.” Australasian Journal of Information Systems 241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weil, Simone. 1934a. Réflexions sur les causes de la liberté et de l’oppression sociale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1934b (1955). Oppression et liberté. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wingrove, Patrick, Jennifer Rigby, and Emma Farge. 2025. “Trump orders US exit from World Health Organization.” Reuters, 21 January 2025. [URL]
World Health Organization (WHO). 2023. “EPI-WIN Webinar: A Fragile State of Preparedness: 2023 Global Preparedness Monitoring Board report.” 15 November 2023, 13:00–14:00, Online public session. Geneva, CH.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zerubavel, Eviatar. 1997. Social Mindscapes. An Invitation to Cognitive Sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Yizhang, and Mingyu Wang. 2023. “Digital Sociology: Origin, Development, and Prospects from a Global Perspective.” Journal of Chinese Sociology 10(1): article 19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue