Article published In: The Role of ISO/TC 37 Standards for Translators, Interpreters, Terminologists and Beyond
Edited by Hendrik J. Kockaert
[Digital Translation 10:2] 2023
► pp. 180–199
The impact of ISO/TC 37 standards on technical communication
Published online: 15 December 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.00007.mah
https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.00007.mah
Abstract
Rather than just profiting from digitalization efforts such as the implementation and improvement of automated
content delivery processes, technical communication itself currently has the opportunity of becoming a major driver in
digitalization. The essence of technical communicators’ work is to create representations of products under the aspect of product
use. In order to convey how a product functions and how it shall be used, they build concepts that reflect its structure and the
structure of the domain to which it belongs. These concepts and their interrelations represent the underlying architecture of
information that is rendered into ‘technical documentation’ in the course of the information development process which parallels
the product development process. To harmonize concepts for information on products to be launched and in its proper domain, as
well as to ensure interoperability between digital resources, technical communication relies on a range of standards created
within and published by ISO Technical Committee 37, Language and Terminology (ISO SMART Standardization
Proposal. 2022. Unpublished. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TC 37.).
Article outline
- 1.Knowledge work in technical communication
- 1.1What is technical communication concerned with?
- 1.2What happens in the information development process?
- 1.2.1Environment analysis (including market monitoring results)
- 1.2.2Planning and concept development
- 1.2.3Content creation, media production, publication and distribution
- 2.Conceptual information in technical communication
- 2.1From documents to information
- 2.2From mental models to concept systems
- 3.Technical communication and its terminology
- 3.1ISO 24183, Technical communication – Vocabulary
- 3.2Concept model in ISO 24183
- 4.Digitalization, concept repositories and terminology
- 4.1Concept repositories
- 4.2Characterization of properties
- 4.3Technical communication and submodel templates
- 5.ISO TR 24633 series: TBX in new looks
- 6.SMART: Standards that speak for themselves
- 7.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (35)
Abterno, Hippie. 2006. Folio
Bound VIEWS – the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders
Peirce. Accessed June
2023. [URL]
Commens. Digital Companion to C. S. Peirce: Diagram, Dictionary,
Commens. 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2226: Laying down Rules for the
Application of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Electronic Instructions for
Use of Medical Devices. 2021. Official Journal of the European Union 2021:
L 448/32 – L 448/38, EU Publications Office.
“Common Data
Dictionary.” 2023. International Electrotechnical
Commission. Accessed June
2023. [URL]
“Defining Technical Communication: Developing Information
Products.” 2023. tekom Europe
e.V. Accessed June
2023. [URL]
“Details of the Asset Administration Shell – Part 1:
Specification.” 2022. Plattform Industrie
4.0. Accessed June
2023. [URL]
Digital Data Chain
Consortium. 2023. “Digital Data
Chain.” Accessed April 2023. [URL].
Drewer, Petra, and Donatella Pulitano, eds. 2019. Terminologie:
Epochen – Schwerpunkte – Umsetzungen. Zum 25-jährigen Bestehen des Rats für Deutschsprachige
Terminologie. Kommunikation und Medienmanagement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
“ECLASS e.V. Search the ECLASS
Content.” 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Gruber, Tom. 2021. “Definition
of Ontology. What Is an Ontology.” In Encyclopedia of Database
Systems, edited by M. Ling Liu and Tamer Özsu, 1–3. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Heidel, Roland. 2019. Industrie
4.0: The Reference Architecture Model RAMI 4.0 and the Industrie 4.0
Component. Berlin: Beuth.
“IDTA – Working Together to Promote the Digital
Twin.” 2023. IDTA. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
IEC 2023 (FDIS). Asset Administration Shell for Industrial
Applications – Part 1: Asset Administration Shell Structure. IEC
63278-1:2023. Geneva: IEC.
IEC/IEEE. 2019. Preparation of Information
for Use (Instructions for Use) Of Products – Part 1: Principles and General Requirements. IEC/IEEE
82079-1:2019. Geneva: IEC.
“IEC/ISO SMART. Unleashing the digital power of international
standards.” 2022. ISO. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
IEC PAS 63485. 2023. Intelligent
Information Request and Deliver – A process model for the exchange of information for use. IEC PAS
63485:2023. Geneva: IEC.
ISO. 2023. Technical Communication –
Vocabulary. ISO (FDIS)
24183:2023. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
. 2019. Terminology Work and
Terminology Science –
Vocabulary. ISO1087:2019. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
. 2022. Management of Terminology
Resources – Data Categories – Part 1:
Specifications. ISO12620-1:2022. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
. 2014. Graphic notations for concept
modelling in terminology work and its relationship with UML – Part 1: Guidelines for using UML notation in terminology
work. ISO
24156-1:2014. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
. 2019. Management of Terminology
Resources – TermBase EXchange (TBX). ISO
30042:2019. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO SMART Standardization
Proposal. 2022. Unpublished. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TC 37.
“InterOpera.” 2023. Steinbeis Innovation
gGmbH. Accessed June
2023. [URL]
“Introduction to TermBase EXchange (TBX): TBX
Dialects.” 2021. LTAC. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 2010. “Mental Models and Human
Reasoning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
(PNAS), Vol. 1, no. 43, 18243–18250.
Muthig, Jürgen. 2014. Standardisierungsmethoden
für die Technische Dokumentation (tekom Hochschulschriften 16).
Ogden, Charles Kay, and Ivor Armstrong Richards. 1923. The
Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of
Symbolism. London: K. Paul Trench Trubner & Co.
“RDF – Semantic Web
Standards.” 2023. W3C. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Schmitz, Klaus-Dirk. 2020. Terminology
Work – Best Practices 2.0. Cologne: Deutscher Terminologie-Tag e.V.
“SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System – Home
Page.” 2012. W3C. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Sowa, John F. 2000. “Ontology, Metadata, and
Semiotics.” In Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and
Computational Issues, 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000 Darmstadt, Germany, August 14–18, 2000
Proceedings¸ edited by Bernhard Ganter and Guy W. Mineau, 55–81. Springer Verlag.
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology:
An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics (Synthese Library
336). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
Straub, Daniela. 2022. Trendreport
2022. Zahlen und Fakten der Technischen Kommunikation in
Deutschland. Stuttgart: tekom.
tekom Deutschland e.V. About – Tekom
iiRDS. 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
