Cover not available

In:Disability in Dialogue
Edited by Jessica M.F. Hughes and Mariaelena Bartesaghi
[Dialogue Studies 33] 2023
► pp. 4966

References (33)
References
Ahmed, Sara. 2012. On Being Included. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 2006. “Producing a ‘Cognition.’” Discourse Studies 8(1): 9–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aristotle. 1926. Politics, trans. by John Henry Freese. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1960. Posterior Analytics, trans. by Hugh Tredennick. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braet, Antoine C. 2005. “The Common Topic in Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Precursor of the Argumentation Scheme.” Argumentation 19(1): 65–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Norman Fairclough. 2002. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth. 2005. The Disability Pendulum: The First Decade of the Americans with Disabilities Act. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grue, Jan. 2016. “The Problem with Inspiration Porn: A Tentative Definition and a Provisional Critique.” Disability and Society 31(6): 838–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Inclusive Marginalisation? A Critical Analysis of the Concept of Disability, its Framings and their Implications in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.” Nordic Journal of Human Rights 37(1): 3–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, Bill. 2019. A Historical Sociology of Disability: Human Validity and Invalidity from Antiquity to Early Modernity. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jayyusi, Lena. 1984. Categorization and the Moral Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan. 2017. From Pragmatics to Dialogue. In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 78–93. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krieger, Linda H. 2003. Backlash against the ADA: Reinterpreting Disability Rights. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Létourneau, Alain. 2012. “Towards an Inclusive Notion of Dialogue for Ethical and Moral Purposes.” In (Re)presentations and Dialogue, ed. by François Cooren and Alain Létourneau. 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, David T. and Sharon L. Snyder. 2020. “Disability, Neoliberal Inclusionism and Non-Normative Positivism.” In Neoliberalism in Context: Governance, Subjectivity, and Knowledge, ed. by Simon Dawes and Marc Lenormand, 177–193. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norden, Martin F. 1994. The Cinema of Isolation: A History of Disability in the Movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norges Offentlige Utredninger (NOU). 2001. Fra Bruker til Borger [From user to citizen] (Nummer 22). Statens Forvaltningstjeneste. [URL]
O’Halloran, Kieran. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognition. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 1990. The Politics of Disablement. New York: MacMillan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Understanding Disability, from Theory to Practice. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael and Colin Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ot. Prp. Nr 2. Ang. Utfærdigelse af en Lov om Skoler for Abnorme Børn, 1879. (testimony of Kirkedepartementet).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. 2009. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 87–121. Newbury Park, Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweik, Susan M. 2009. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sosialdepartementet. 1966. Om Utviklingen av Omsorgen for Funksjonshemmede. St.mld nr. 88. (1966–1967). [URL]
Statistics Norway. 2019. Labour Force Survey. [URL]
Titchkosky, Tanya. 2003. “Governing Embodiment: Technologies of Constituting Citizens with Disabilities.” Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie 28(4): 517–542. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
United Nations. 2006. “General Assembly Resolution 61/106,” Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A/RES/61/106. [URL]
Weigand, Edda. 2017. “The Mixed Game Model: A Holistic Theory.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 174–193. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiss, Gilbert and Ruth Wodak. 2003. Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory andIinterdisciplinarity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, Henry G. 2004. Text, Context, Pretext: Critical Issues in Discourse Analysis. Hoboken, Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, Stella. 2014. I’m Not Your Inspiration, Thank You Very Much [Video]. TEDxSydney. [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Vale, Marte Oppedal & Halvor Melbye Hanisch
2025. How Is the Inclusion of People with Disabilities at Work Conceptualized in Norway’s Inclusive Working Life (IA) Agreement?. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 27:1  pp. 648 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue