In:Disability in Dialogue
Edited by Jessica M.F. Hughes and Mariaelena Bartesaghi
[Dialogue Studies 33] 2023
► pp. 34–48
The autistic dialogue
A Bakhtinian framework for singular voices
Published online: 19 September 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.33.02ste
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.33.02ste
Abstract
From his early texts on language, consciousness, and
ideology, to his later contributions to literary criticism, Mikhail
Bakhtin’s theory centers speech in the dynamics of communicative exchanges.
This chapter considers how Bakhtinian notions such as dialogue,
double-voicing, and heteroglossia offer significant analytic purchase for
understanding autistic phenomena, notably autistic language and autistic
semiosis more broadly, what we refer to as autistic voice.
By way of empirical demonstration, the authors examine everyday verbal
exchanges between autistic children, their family members, and tutors in
home contexts. These verbal exchanges were video recorded, transcribed and
analyzed employing an integrated methodology, which combines linguistic,
discourse, and acoustic analyses, highlighting the dialogues’ simultaneous
singularity and multiplicity. Our examination yields an understanding of the
autistic voice as inherently polyphonic, oriented to dialogue and
creativity.
Keywords: autism, dialogue, double-voicing, heteroglossia, polyphony
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The challenges of defining autistic voice
- 3.Rethinking autism within the social model of disability
- 4.A Bakhtinian framework
- 4.1Dialogue as essential attribute of language
- 4.2Double voiced discourse
- 4.3Heteroglossia: Centrifugal and centripetal forces in language
- 5.Analyzing autistic language with Bakhtin
- 5.1Echolalia as joint production in dialogic exchanges
- 5.2Echolalia as revoicing
- 6.Conclusion: The emergence of the autistic voice
Notes References Appendix
References (34)
Asperger, Hans. 1944. “Die
‘Autistischen Psychopathen’ im
Kindesalter.” Archiv für Psychiatrie
und
Nervenkrankheiten 117: 76–136.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. “Discourse
in the
Novel.” In The
Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, ed.
by Michael Holquist, trans.
by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin: University of Texas Press.
1984. Problems
of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans.
by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
1986. Speech
Genres and Other Late Essays, ed.
by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, trans.
by Vern W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Ball, Arnetha and Sarah Warshauer Freedman (eds.). 2004. Bakhtinian
Perspectives on Language, Literacy, and
Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barbetta, Pietro and Enrico Valtellina. 2015. “Intuitive
Pathways of the Autistic
Mind.” Journal of Medicine and the
Person 13(3): 169–177.
Billig, Michael. 2004. Freudian
Repression Conversation Creating the
Unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bleuler, Eugene. 1911. Dementia
Praecox oder Gruppe der
Schizophrenien. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke Verlag.
Cooren, François. 2010. Action
and Agency in Dialogue: Passion, Incarnation, and
Ventriloquism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Davidson, Joyce and Michael Orsini. 2013. Worlds
of Autism: Across the Spectrum of Neurological
Difference. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Davis, Leonard. 1990. “The
Monologic Imagination: M. M. Bakhtin and the Nature of
Assertion.” Studies in the Literary
Imagination 23(1): 29–44.
Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins
of Philosophy, trans.
by Alan Bass. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Good, Peter. 2000. Language
for Those Who Have Nothing: Mikhail Bakhtin and the Landscape of
Psychiatry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hacking, Ian. 2009. “How
We Have Been Learning to Talk about Autism: A Role for
Stories.” Metaphilosophy 40(3/4): 499–516. [URL].
. 2010. “Autism
Fiction: A Mirror of an Internet
Decade?” University of Toronto
Quarterly 79(2): 632–655.
Holquist, Michael. 1981. The
Politics of
Representation. In S. J. Greenblatt (Ed.), Allegory
and Representation: Selected Papers from the English Institute
1979–80: 163–183. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 2004. “Glossary
of Transcript Symbols with an
Introduction.” In Pragmatics
and Beyond New Series, ed.
by Gene H. Lerner, Vol. 125: 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ochs, Elinor, Tamar Kremer-Sadlik, Karen G. Sirota, and Olga Solomon. 2004. “Autism
and the Social World: An Anthropological
Perspective.” Discourse
Studies, 6 147–183.
Silverman, Steve. 2015. Neurotribes:
The Legacy of Autism and the Future of
Neurodiversity. London: Penguin.
Sterponi, Laura and Jennifer Shankey. 2014. “Rethinking
Echolalia: Repetition as Interactional Resource in the Communication
of a Child with Autism.” Journal of
Child
Language 41(2): 275–304.
Sterponi, Laura, Kenton de Kirby, and Jennifer Shankey. 2015. “Rethinking
Language in
Autism.” Autism 19(5): 517–526.
Stivers, Tanya. 2005. “Modified
Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights from Second
Position.” Research on Language and
Social
Interaction 38(2): 131–158.
Todorov, Tzvetan. 1984. Mikhail
Bakhtin: The Dialogical
Principle. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Union of the Physically
Impaired Against Segregation
(UPIAS). 1976. Fundamental
Principles of Disability.
Urban, Greg. 1984. “The
‘I’ of
Discourse.” In Semiotics,
Self, and Society, ed.
by Benjamin Lee and Greg Urban, 27–51.
