Cover not available

In:From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and István Kecskés
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 171–188

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Dialogic pragmatics and complex objects

Engaging the life and work of Gregory Bateson

Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.09arn
This essay frames the insights of pragmatics within the stream of everyday life as a normatively dialogical communicative activity. Pragmatics understood as existentially dialogical moves from abstraction to concrete engagement of events and persons. Dialogic pragmatics eschews the assumption that one can single-handedly construct the world, embodying a humble and simultaneously creative social task of infinite semiosis. In order to illustrate this perspective, I turn to a brief outline of pragmatics and then illuminate this perspective with emphasis on the holistic and relational insights of Gregory Bateson’s work and life. I end with discussion of Bateson’s life as a complex object that reveals dialogic pragmatics in unceasing framing of action and reaction, an act of infinite semiosis.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pragmatics and complex objects
  • 3.From paradox to metacommunication: Complex objects
  • 4.Communicology and complex objects
  • 5.Bateson’s biography as a complex object
  • 6.Dialogic pragmatics: Understanding complex objects
  • Notes
  • References
References (25)
References
Bateson, Gregory. 1967. A Theory of Play and Fantasy: A Report on Theoretical Aspects of the Project for Study of the Role of the Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateson, Mary Catherine, Ray Birdwhistell, John Brockman, David Lipset, Rollo May, Margaret Mead, and Edwin Schlossberg. 1977. About Bateson. New York: John Brockman Associates, Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2013. “Defining Pragmatics.” In Introduction to Pragmatics, 1–35. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brockman, John. 2004. Gregory Bateson: The Centennial. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Random House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catt, Isaac E. 2014. “The Two Sciences of Communication in Philosophical Context.” Review of Communication 14(3–4): 201–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeVito, Joseph A. 1978. Communicology: An Introduction to the Study of Communication. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Aubrey B. 1982. “Communication Pragmatism: Another Legacy of Gregory Bateson.” Journal of Applied Research on Children 10(1): 38–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lanigan, Richard. 1975. “The Speech Act Theory of Interpersonal Communication: Stimulus for Research.” Journal of Applied Communications Research 3(2): 98–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Porcar, Codruta and Cristian Hainic. 2011. “The Interactive Dimension of Communication: The Pragmatics of the Palo Alto Group”. Journal of Communication and Culture 1(1): 4–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ray, Wendel A. and Karin Schlanger. 2012. “John H. Weakland: An Interview in Retrospect.” Journal of Systemic Therapies 31(1): 55–73. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rich, Marc Howard and Robert T. Craig. 2012. “Habermas and Bateson in a World Gone M.A.D.: Metacommunication, Paradox, and the Inverted Speech Situation.” Communication Theory 22: 383–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riley, Christopher. 2014. “The Dolphin Who Loved Me: The NASA-funded Project That Went Wrong.” The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, Geoffrey. 1995. The Dark Side of Paradise: Political Violence in Bali. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen. 1972. Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations. Belgium: Mouton & Co. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen, and Gregory Bateson. 1951. Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stagoll, Brian. 2005. “Gregory Bateson (1904–1980): A Reappraisal.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 39: 1036–1045.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Gregory Bateson at 100.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27(3): 121–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2015. “Dialogue in the stream of life.” Language and Dialogue 5(2): 197–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkin, Yves. 1981. La nouvelle communication. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue