In:Dialogic Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Dialogue Studies 30] 2018
► pp. 179–198
Dialogue and ethics in the library
Transformative encounters
Published online: 14 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.07man
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.07man
Abstract
This essay frames the library as a site for dialogic and ethical engagement. As libraries have adapted to cultural and technological shifts, our understanding of the meaning and purpose of libraries also has changed. The role of the library sparks public deliberation, controversy, and at times even legal action. This essay considers the library’s recent commitment to electronic holdings and its implications for the transformative nature of libraries as a site for dialogic ethics. The essay turns to Ronald C. Arnett’s (1981) understanding of phenomenological dialogue, Gary P. Radford’s (1992) framing of the library as a discursive formation, and Umberto Eco’s (2013) library as labyrinth metaphor. Through these works, this essay highlights transformative possibilities for dialogic ethics in the library.
Keywords: library, Umberto Eco, dialogic ethics, discursive formations
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The library’s evolving landscape
- 3.Philosophy of communication perspective
- 4.Umberto Eco: Library as dialogic sites for cultural engagement
- 5.Implications for dialogic ethics
Note References
References (35)
Arnett, Ronald C. 1981. “Toward a Phenomenological Dialogue.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 45: 210–212.
Arnett, Ronald C., and Annette Holba. 2012. An Overture to Philosophy of Communication: The Carrier of Meaning. New York: Peter Lang.
BiblioTech. 2017. “About BiblioTech.” Accessed January 20, [URL]
. 2017. “About BiblioTech” (introduction video). BiblioTech: Bexar County Digital Library. [URL]
. 2017. “About Our Digital Collections.” Accessed January 20, [URL]
Crawford, Alice (ed.). 2015. The Meaning of the Library: A Cultural History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
. 2015. “Introduction.” In The Meaning of the Library: A Cultural History, ed. by Alice Crawford, xiii–xxviii. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Eco, Umberto. [2004] 2006. “On the Advantages and Disadvantages of Death.” In Turning Back the Clock: Hot Wars and Media Populism, trans. Alastair McEwen, 355–361. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.
. 2013. “The Library as a Model for Culture: Preserving, Filtering, Deleting, and Recovering” (lecture). Yale University. [URL]
Eco, Umberto, and Cardinal Carlo Maria Martini. 2012. Belief or Nonbelief?: A Confrontation, trans. Minna Proctor. New York, NY: Arcade Publishing.
Edmondson, Mina and Deborah Eicher-Catt. 2016. “Our Stories Transforming Our Libraries: The York County Library System.” Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice 4: 90–101.
Eicher-Catt, Deborah and Mina Edmondson. 2016. “Reimaging Public Libraries as Learning Communities: What Library Stories Can Tell Us.” Public Library Quarterly 35: 203–221.
Farago, Jason. 2012 July 7. “What Lies Behind the Battle Over the New York Public Library.” Guardian. [URL]
. 2014 May 7. “New York Public Library Abandons Controversial Renovation Plans.” Guardian. [URL]
Lanigan, Richard L. 1996. “Foucault’s Science of Rhetoric: The Contest Between Practical Discourse and Discursive Practice.” Symplokē 4: 189–202.
McNeely, Ian F., and Lisa Wolverton. 2008. Reinventing Knowledge: From Alexandria to the Internet. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
New York Public Library. 2017. “About the Stephen A. Schwarzman Building.” Accessed January 20, [URL]
. 2017. “About NYPL.” Accessed January 20, [URL]
Olesen-Bagneux, Ole. 2014. “The Memory Library: How the Library in Hellenistic Alexandria Worked.” Knowledge Organization 41(1): 3–13.
Polastron, Lucien X. 2004. Books on Fire: The Destruction of Libraries throughout History, trans. by Jon E. Graham. Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions.
Radford, Gary P. 1992. “Positivism, Foucault, and the Fantasia of the Library: Conceptions of Knowledge and the Modern Library Experience.” Library Trends 62(4): 408–424.
1998. “Flaubert, Foucault, and the Bibliotheque Fantastique: Toward a Postmodern Epistemology for Library Science.” Library Trends 46(4): 616–634.
2003b. “Trapped in Our Own Discursive Formations: Toward an Archaeology of Library and Information Science.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community Policy 73(1): 1–18.
Radford, Gary P., and John M. Budd. 1997. “We Do Need a Philosophy of Library and Information Science – We’re Not Confused Enough: A Response to Zwadlo.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community Policy 67(3): 315–321.
Radford, Marie L., and Gary P. Radford. 1997. “Power, Knowledge, and Fear: Feminism, Foucault, and the Stereotype of the Female Librarian.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community Policy 67(3): 250–266.
. 2003. “Librarians and Party Girls: Cultural Studies and the Meaning of the Librarian.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community Policy 73(1): 54–69.
Radford, Gary P., and Marie L. Radford. 2001. “Libraries, Librarians, and the Discourse of Fear.” The Library Quarterly: Information, Community Policy 71(3): 299–329.
. 2005. “Structuralism, Post-Structuralism, and the Library: de Saussure and Foucault.” Journal of Documentation 61(1): 60–78.
Radford, Gary P., Marie L. Radford, and Jessica Lingel. 2012. “Alternative Libraries as Discursive Formations: Reclaiming the Voice of the Deaccessioned Book.” Journal of Documentation 68(2): 254–267.
. 2015. “The Library as Heterotopia: Michel Foucault and the Experience of Library Space.” Journal of Documentation 71(4): 733–751.
