Cover not available

In:Dialogic Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Dialogue Studies 30] 2018
► pp. 149–177

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

An interlocutory logic approach of a case of professional ethics

Published online: 14 June 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.06bat
Abstract
In this paper, we present some parts of a corpus taken from recordings of a predictive medicine consultation for the test of Huntington’s disease (Batt 2003; Batt & Trognon 2010; Sarangi, Bennert & al. 2004). By mobilizing an “Interlocutory Analysis” (Trognon & Batt 2010; Batt, Trognon & al. 2014), the authors analyze how a patient presents her states of mind (goals, beliefs, desires, trust, hesitations, rejection, etc.) as well as the responses given by the professionals with whom she is speaking. They also analyze the consequences of these relationships on the interactive process. The authors then outline some key ethical constraints specifically imposed by this kind of consultation, which can be compared with some sort of deliberation game.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.From predictive medicine consultation to predictive genetic consultation for HD
    • 2.1Predictive medicine consultation
    • 2.2The predictive genetic consultation of Huntington’s disease
  • 3.Interlocutory logic
  • 4.The process that leads Mrs. P. to request the test
    • 4.1The triggering event of Mrs. P.’s decision
      • 4.1.1The status of P25-P27 in the continuation of the interview with the geneticist
      • 4.1.2The status of P25-P27 in the interview with the psychologist
  • 5.The decision-making of Mrs. P.
    • 5.1The decision tree of Mrs. P.
    • 5.2The refusal to hear
  • 6.Conclusion
    • 6.1What type of dialogue?
      • 6.1.1A dialogal-dialogic interaction oriented towards intercomprehension
      • 6.1.2A practical deliberation
      • 6.1.3A verbal argumentative interaction
    • 6.2What is the outcome in the case of Mrs. P.?
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Auroux, Sylvain 1990. « Ethique ». In Encyclopédie Philosophique Universelle. Les Notions Philosophiques-Dictionnaire 1, édité par Sylvain Auroux, 870–872. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakthine, Mikhaïl [N. V. Volochinov 1977]. Le marxisme et la philosophie du langage. Essai d’application de la méthode sociologique en linguistique. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bange, Pierre et Herman Kayser 1987. « L’organisation d’une consultation. Approche théorique et empirique ». In Pierre Bange (ed.), L’analyse des interactions verbales. La dame de Caluire, une consultation, ed. Pierre Bange (Berne: Peter Lang).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barth, Else M. and Erik-C. W. Krabbe 1982. From Axiom to Dialogue. Berlin, N. Y.: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine; Luporsi, Elisabeth; Trognon, Alain; Laux, Jenifer; Michel, Dominique 2006. « Etude exploratoire des propriétés communicationnelles de la consultation d’oncogénétique », Revue Francophone de Psycho-Oncologie, 8, n° 2, 1–5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine and Alain Trognon, Alain 2007. « Des pratiques communicationnelles au service de la médecine prédictive », Actualités Psychologiques, 19, 129–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine; Trognon, Alain 2009. « Ergonomie cognitive d’un conseil génétique pour le test présmptomatique de maladie de Huntington », Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 15, n° 1, 21–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine et Alain Trognon 2010. « De quelles méthodes logiques avons-nous besoin pour soutenir le projet d’une logique naturelle de l’usage du langage en interaction? Analyse conversationnelle d’un biais de raisonnement survenu dans une interaction de conseil génétique », in Sciences du langage et demandes sociales, ed. Par Christian Hudelot (Limoges: Editions Lambert-Lucas), 31–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine; Trognon, Alain. 2011. « L’éthique de l’interaction au bloc opératoire », Inter-Bloc, 4, XXX, 4, 236–238.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine et Alain Trognon 2012. Etude d’un jeu de dialogue professionnel. Le conseil génétique en médecine prédictive. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine; Trognon, Alain; Vernant, Denis 2004. « Quand l’argument effleure la conviction: Analyse interlocutoire d’une croyance dans un entretien de médecine prédictive », Psychologie de l’interaction, 17–18, 167–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Batt, Martine; Trognon, Alain; Rivasseau-Jonveaux, Thérèse; Vernant, Denis; Jonveaux, Philippe 2014. « Dialogical history of a logical fallacy spontaneously produced during a predictive medicine consultation. Role of the causal connective Puisque in a discussion », Journal of Pragmatics, Volume 61, January, 120–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beach, Lee R. 1997. The Psychology of Decision Making. People in Organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carlson, Lauri 1983. Dialogue Games. An approach to discourse Analysis. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dascal, Marcelo 1989. « On the role of context and literal meaning in understanding ». Cognitive Science, 13, 253–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durand, G. 1990 « Ethique (bio-) ». In Encyclopédie Philosophique Universelle. Les Notions Philosophiques-Dictionnaire 1, édité par Sylvain Auroux, 872–874. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund 1925/1934. Die Verneinung. Gesammelte Werke Bd. XIV, pp. 9–15. (La négation. Revue Française de Psychanalyse, 1934, T. VII, n° 2, 174–177).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardies, Jean-Louis 1990. Essai sur la logique des modalités. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gargiulo, M.; Leujeune, S.; Tanguy, M. -L.; Lahlou-Laforer, K.; Faudet, A.; Cohen, D.; Feingold, J.; Dürr, A. 2009. Long-term outcome of presymptomatic testing in Huntington disease, European Journal of Human Genetics 17, 2, 165–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin 1971. Relations in Public: Micro-Studies of the Public Order. Hardmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottman, John M. 1979 Marital Interaction. Experimental investigations. New York: Academic Press, 1979.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grossen, Michèle; Salazar-Orvig, Anne 2011. « Processus d’influence, cadrage et mouvements discursifs dans un groupe focalisé », Bulletin de psychologie, 5, 515, 5, 425–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürken 1981. Théorie de l’agir communicationnel. Tome 1. Rationalité de l’agir et rationalisation de la société. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hare, Richard M. 1965. The language of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1965.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. Moral Thinking. Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaako and Jack Kulas 1983. The Game of Language. Studies in Game Theoretical Semantics and its Applications. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont. 2004. La prise de décision en éthique clinique. Document de réflexion du Comité d’éthique. Montréal: Bibliothèque nationale du Québec.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacques, Francis 1979. Dialogiques. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1985. L’espace logique de l’interlocution. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. Trois stratégies conversationnelles: conversation, négociation, dialogue. In Echanges sur la conversation, édité par Jacques Cosnier, Nadine Gelas et Catherine Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 45–68. Paris: Editions du CNRS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri 1973. « Implicative verbs », Language, vol. 47, No 2 (1973, 340–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleindorfer, Paul. R., Howard C. Kunreuther and Paul J. Schoemarker 1993. Decision Sciences. An Integrative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lalande, André 1968. « Ethique ». In Vocabulaire critique et technique de la philosophie, édité par André Lalande, 305–306. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Robert 1969. « Analyse sémantique du mot « peu » », Langue Française, Vol. 4, N° 1, 75–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean et Benjamin Pontalis 1967. Vocabulaire de la psychanalyse. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen 1979. « Activity types and Language », Linguistics 17, 5/6, 365–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellos, K. 1990. « Ethique (- professionnelle) ». In Encyclopédie Philosophique Universelle. Les Notions Philosophiques-Dictionnaire 1, édité par Sylvain Auroux, 876–877. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mordrup, Ole 1975. « Présuppositions, implications et verbes français ». Revue Romane, Bind 10, 1 1975.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moscovici, Serge et Wilhem Doise 1992. Dissensions, consensus. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patenaude, Johane 1996. Le dialogue comme compétence éthique. Ph.D. Québec. Université Laval à Québec.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. « Au coeur de l’éthique: le dialogue », Le dialogue comme compétence éthique. Stratégies pratiques pour faire avancer le dialogue. UQAC. 11 avril.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patenaude, Johane; Lambert, Cécile; Dionne, Michelle; Marcoux, Hubert; Jeliu, Gloria; Brazeau-Lamontagne, Lucie 2001. « L’éthique comme compétence clinique: modélisation d’une approche dialogique », Pédagogie Médicale, 2, 2, 71–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Politzer, Guy 2002. Le raisonnement humain. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quinche, Florence 2005. La délibération éthique. Contribution du dialogisme et de la logique des questions. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roulet, Edy, Antoine Auchlin, Jacques Moeschler, Christian Rubattel et Monica Schelling 1985. L’articulation du discours en français contemporain. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salazar-Orvig, Anne; Grossen, Michèle 2010. « Analyse de discours produit dans des focus groupes et représentations sociales: un point de vue dialogique », Bulletin de Psychologie, 57 (3), n° 471, 263–272.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant 2010. « Healthcare Interaction as an Expert Communicative System. An Activity Analysis Perspective ». In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, edited by Jürgen Streek, 168–197. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John 1992. « Conversation ». In On Searle on Conversation, edited by Herman Parret and Jeff Verschueren, 7–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John and Daniel Vanderveken 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and Dierde Wilson 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thiel, Marie-Jo et Xavier Thévenot 1999. Pratiquer l’analyse éthique. Etudier un cas, analyser un texte. Paris: Cerf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, Stephen E. 1982 « How Medecine Saved the Life of Ethics? », Perspectives in Biology and Medecine, 25/4, 736–750. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain 1984. « Préliminaires á une étude des formes d’agencement des conflits dans l’interlocution », Verbum, VII, 2/3, 319–339.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. “Interlocution”. In Encyclopédie Philosophique Universelle. Les Notions Philosophiques-Dictionnaire 1, édité par Sylvain Auroux, 1357. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. « Speech Acts and the Logic of Mutual Understanding ». In Essays in Speech Acts Theory, edited by Daniel Vanderveken & Sosumo Kubo, 121–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins and sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain et Martine Batt 2011. « Some Aspects of the Current Situation in Research on Dialogue Logic: Introduction to Logical Properties of Dialogue ». In Logical Properties of Dialogue, edited by Alain Trognon, Martine Batt, Jean Caelen and Denis Vernant, 7–25. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain, Martine Batt, Marcel Bromberg, Christine Sorsana et Sophie Frigout 2011. « Les formes logiques de la parole-en-interaction. Quelques bases de la logique interlocutoire ». In Psychologie sociale de la communication 2, édité par Phillipe Castel, Marie France. Lacassagne et Edith Salès-Wuillemin. Paris: De Boeck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain, Martine Batt, Christine Sorsana et Valérie Saint-Dizier 2011. « Argumentation and Dialogue ». In Logical Properties of Dialogue, edited by Alain Trognon, Martine Batt, Jean Caelen and Denis Vernant, 147–186. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain et Martine Batt 2010. « Interlocutory Logic: A Unified Framework for Studying Conversational Interaction ». In New Adventures in Language and Interaction, edited by Jürgen Streek, 168–197. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 2010. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel 1990. Meaning and Speech Acts (1): Principles of Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1990. Meaning and Speech Acts (2): Formal Semantic of Success and Satisfaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. « La logique illocutoire et l’analyse du discours ». In Le Dialogique, édité par Daniel Luzzati; Jean Claude Beacco; Reza Mir-Samii; Michel Murat; Martial Vivet, 59–94. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, Donald et Erik C. Krabbe 1995. Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany, N. Y.: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Weigand, Edda
2018. Dialogue. In From Pragmatics to Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 31], ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue