In:Dialogic Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Dialogue Studies 30] 2018
► pp. 1–23
Ethics in dialogue
Ideals and reality
Published online: 14 June 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.01wei
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.01wei
Abstract
Ethics is considered to be rooted in human nature. Human beings as dialogic individuals have to balance their self-interests and social concerns. In performance, there is no ethical codex that determines once for all what is ‘good’ and ‘right.’ We have, in any historical moment, to decide how we want to mediate between ethical ideals and reality. Variables of use, such as practicability, culture, and interest, shape the decision in complex action games. After a brief survey of the history of studies on ethics, the article outlines the basic points of a holistic theory of dialogue in performance, and analyses a few authentic examples, which demonstrate that ethical ideals have to be adapted to conditions of reality.
Keywords: human nature, adaptation, ethical codex, ethics in performance, practicability, culture, interests
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2. A brief survey of the history of ethical studies
- 3.The universal basis: Ethics as an inborn property of human nature
- 4.From the universal to the particular: Specialization of ethics by culture
- 5.Ideals and practicability
- 6. Interests of the masters of mankind
- 7.Strategies of cooperation versus confrontation
- 8.Outlook
References
References (48)
Arnett, Ronald C. 2013. Communication Ethics in Dark Times. Hannah Arendt’s Rhetoric of Warning and Hope. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
. 2017a. “Communicative Ethics. The phenomenological sense of semioethics.” Language and Dialogue 7(1): 80–100.
. 2017b. “Language as the Originative House of Dialogic Ethics.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 307–317. New York: Routledge.
2017c. Levinas’s Rhetorical Demand. The Unending Obligation of Communication Ethics. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Cho, Yongkil. 2005. Grammatik und Höflichkeit im Sprachvergleich. Direktive Handlungsspiele des Bittens, Aufforderns und Anweisens im Deutschen und Koreanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer/de Gruyter.
Fieser, James. “Ethics.” In The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002, [URL], retrieved 19.2.2016.
Frawley, William. 1987. “Review Article: Teun A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of Discourse Analysis, I-IV.” Language 63: 361–397.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1960. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Grein, Marion. 2007. “The Speech Act of Refusal within the Minimal Action Game. A comparative study of German and Japanese.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 95–113. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Grein, Marion and Edda Weigand (eds). 2007. Dialogue and Culture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics. Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
. 1991. “Comments on John Searle: ‘Meaning, Communication, and Representation.’” In John Searle and his Critics, ed. by Ernest Lepore and Robert van Gulick, 17–29. Cambridge, Mass./Oxford: Blackwell.
Harcourt, Edward. 2013. “Wittgenstein, Ludwig.” In The International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Hugh LaFollette (ed.), 5503–5510. Blackwell. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Harris, Roy. 1996. Signs, Language and Communication. Integrational and Segregational Approaches. London and New York: Routledge.
Jakobson, Roman O. 1971. Word and Language. In Selected Writings, vol. 2. 1962–2002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics. How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago University Press, sec. ed.
Levinson, Stephen C. 2006. “On the Human ‘Interaction Engine’.” In Roots of Human Sociality. Culture, Cognition and Interaction, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Stephen C. Levinson, 39–69. New York: Berg.
Lumsden, Charles J. and Edward O. Wilson. 2005. Genes, Mind, and Culture: The Coevolutionary Process. New Jersey: World Scientific.
Lanigan, Richard L. Forthc. “The Rhetoric of Discourse: Chiasm and Dialogue in Communicology.” (in this volume)
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2010. “Making Knowledge: Explorations of the Indissoluble Relation between Minds, Bodies and Environment.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 16 (2): 1–21.
Pablé, Adrian and Christopher Hutton. 2015. Signs, Meaning and Experience. Integrational Approaches to Linguistics and Semiotics. Boston/Berlin: de Gruyter.
Premawardhena, Neelakshi Chandrasena. 2007. “How diplomatic can a language be?” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 213–226. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Searle, John R. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, Herbert A. 1962. “The Architecture of Complexity: Hierarchic Systems.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–482.
Weigand, Edda. 1991. “The Dialogic Principle Revisited: Speech Acts and Mental States.” In Dialoganalyse III. Referate der 3. Arbeitstagung Bologna 1990, Sorin Stati, Edda Weigand and Franz Hundsnurscher (eds), vol. 1, 75–104. Tübingen: Niemeyer/de Gruyter. – Again 2009. In Edda Weigand. Language as Dialogue. From Rules to Principles of Probability, Sebastian Feller (ed.), 21–44. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. – Again 2016. In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, Alessandro Capone and Jacob L. Mey (eds), 209–232. Cham etc.: Springer.
. 2007. “The Sociobiology of Language.” In Dialogue and Culture, ed. by Marion Grein and Edda Weigand, 27–49. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
. 2011. “Paradigm Changes in Linguistics: From Reductionism to Holism.” Language Sciences 33: 544–549.
. 2016. “How to Verify a Theory of Dialogue.” Language and Dialogue 6 (3): 349–369.
. 2017. “The Concept of Language in an Utterance Grammar.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 214–233. New York: Routledge.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Liu, Delin
2022. Review of Pickering & Garrod (2021): Understanding Dialogue: Language Use and Social Interaction. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 23:2 ► pp. 348 ff.
Weigand, Edda
Weigand, Edda
Linell, Per
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
