Cover not available

In:Dialogue across Media
Edited by Jarmila Mildorf and Bronwen Thomas
[Dialogue Studies 28] 2017
► pp. 19–36

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Pragmatic stylistics and dramatic dialogue

Re-assessing Gus’s role in Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter

Published online: 19 January 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.28.02man
In this chapter, I follow Short (1989, 1998) and view dramatic dialogue as a form of exchange that can be read on the page just as legitimately as it can be experienced on stage. Employing a pragmatic stylistic analysis linking the text on the page to my interpretation, I offer a re-reading of Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter. While for Burton (1980) Ben was “the dominating and superior interactant,” and Gus “the dominated and inferior one” (70), I argue here that it is Gus who can be considered the dominating character and show in the concluding discussion why this recalibration of power is significant for our wider understanding of the play.
References (35)
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1981. “Discourse in the Novel.” In The Dialogic Imagination, ed. by Michael Holquist, trans. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, 259-422. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brewer, Mary. 2009a. “Introduction: The Dumb Waiter – A Different Kind of Theatre.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, xi-xiv. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. “‘Mixed Feelings about Words’: Language, Politics and the Ethics of Intersubjectivity in The Dumb Waiter .” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 189-209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen Levinson. 1987 [1978]. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buck, Ruth A. 1997. “Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter .” Explicator 56 (1): 45-48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton, Deirdre. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ron. 1982. “Style and Interpretation in Hemingway’s ‘Cat in the Rain.’” In Language and Literature: An Introductory Reading in Stylistics, ed. by Ron Carter, 65-80. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2009. “Salient Inferences: Pragmatics and The Inheritors .” Language and Literature 18 (2): 173-212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1996 [1973]. “What is Stylistics and Why are They Saying Such Terrible Things About It?” In The Stylistics Reader, ed. by Jean Jacques Weber, 94-116. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Esslin, Martin. 1968. The Theatre of the Absurd. 2nd ed. Middlesex: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala. 1995. Dramatic Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
James, Oliver. 2014. Office Politics. London: Vermilion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeffries, Leslie. 2010. Critical Stylistics. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mandala, Susan. 2007. Twentieth-Century Drama Dialogue as Ordinary Talk. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nastić, Radmila. 2009. “ The Dumb Waiter: Realism and Metaphor.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 17-29. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norman, Lance. 2009. “Anti-Ritual, Critical Domestication and Representational Precision in Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter .” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 173-188. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Patterson, Michael. 2009. “Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter: Negotiating the Boundary between ‘High’ and ‘Low’ Culture.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 127-140. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinter, Harold. 1991. The Room and The Dumb Waiter. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prentice, Penelope. 2009. “‘The Ironic Con Game’ Revisited: Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, A Key to Courage.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 143-159. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quigley, Austin. 1975. The Pinter Problem. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rees, Catherine. 2009. “High Art or Popular Culture: Traumatic Conflict of Representation and Postmodernism in Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter .” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 111-125. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rose, Brian. 1992. “The City Beyond the Door: Effects of the Urban Milieu in Pinter’s Early Plays.” Theatre Studies 37: 56-65.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rufford, Juliet. 2009. “‘Disorder. . . in a Darkened Room’: The Juridico-Political Aspects of The Dumb Waiter.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 89-109. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5: 1-23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Marc. 2009. “Unpacking the Pinteresque in The Dumb Waiter and Beyond.” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 211-229. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shandell, Jonathan. 2009. “The ‘Other” Within Us: the Rubin’s Vase of Class in The Dumb Waiter .” In Harold Pinter’s The Dumb Waiter, ed. by Mary Brewer, 161-171. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Short, Mick. 1989. “Discourse Analysis and the Analysis of Drama.” In Language, Discourse and Literature, ed. by Paul Simpson, 139-168. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “From Dramatic Text to Dramatic Performance.” In Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Mick Short, and Peter Verdonk, 6-18. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John, and Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, Jenny. 1984. “Cross-Cultural Discourse as ‘Unequal Encounter’: Towards a Pragmatic Analysis.” Applied Linguistics 5 (3): 226-235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsui, Amy B.M. 1994. English Conversations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Laan, Thomas. 1981. “The Dumb Waiter: Pinter’s Play with the Audience.” Modern Drama 24 (4): 494-502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue