Cover not available

In:Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. vii–xiv

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Introduction

Persuasive action games or the power of words in dialogic interaction

ORCiD logo with link | Transilvania University of Brasov (Romania)
Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.001int
References (15)
References
Anderson, Rob, and Kenneth N. Cissna. 1996. “Criticism and Conversational Texts: Rhetorical Bases of Role, Audience, and Style in the Buber-Rogers Dialogue.” Human Studies 19: 85–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist, transl. by V.W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cattani, Adelino. 2008. “Logical and Rhetorical Rules of Debate.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson. 2008. “Dialogic Rhetoric, Coauthorship, and Moments of Meeting.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooren, François. 2008. “The Selection of Agency as a Rhetorical Device: Opening up the Scene of Dialogue Through Ventriloquism.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 23–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1963. Essais de linguistique générale. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neagu, Maria-Ionela. 2013. Decoding Political Discourse. Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J. 1967. The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1934/1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rovenţa-Frumuşani, Daniela. 2000. Argumentarea. Modele şi strategii. Bucureşti: All.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2003. Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd rev. ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation 20 (1): 59–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pelclová, Jana & Wei-lun Lu
2018. Persuasion across times, domains and modalities. In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue