Cover not available

In:Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 369–387

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Questioning certainty in research articles and popular science articles

A case-study of modalized wh-interrogatives

 | University of Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
 | University of Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.17pic
This paper is a comparative study of the use of direct and indirect modalized wh-questions in research articles and popular science articles. The corpus analysis reveals that these questions are often interpreted as rhetorical questions and that they are often used to question a proposition that has been previously presented as certain or almost certain. We first suggest that rhetorical questions of this form fall into three semantic types (non-polyphonic, polemic and pseudo-polemic). Their distribution and/or function are then shown to vary across genres – they tend to serve argumentative purposes in research articles and explicative purposes in popular science articles. Finally we examine the parameters which affect the strength with which the presupposition is questioned.
References (29)
References
Adam, Jean-Michel. 1992. Les textes: Types et prototypes. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behre, Frank. 1955. Meditative-Polemic SHOULD in Modern English THAT-Clauses. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bondi, Marina. 2012. “Re-contextualizing Knowledge. Past and Present in Popular History”. Paper presented at the 4th International 360 Conference “Encompassing Knowledge Mediation”. Aarhus, Danemark.
Brooks, Cleanth, and Robert P. Warren. 1979. Modern Rhetoric. New York: HBJ.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher S. 1990. “Qualifications in Science: Modal Meanings in Scientific Texts.” In The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse, ed. by Walter Nash, 137–170. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald. 1991. Dire et ne pas dire: Principes de sémantique structurale. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald, and Jean-Claude Anscombre. 1981. “Interrogation et argumentation.” Langue française 52: 5–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Trine Dahl, and Torodd Kinn. 2006. Academic Voices: Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Furmaniak, Gregory. 2014. “Entre logique et réalité: Le cas des interrogatives en why would…?.” Travaux linguistiques du Cerlico 26: 341–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grize, Jean-Blaise. 1990. Logique et langage. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye. 2002. “Interpreting Interrogatives as Rhetorical Questions.” Lingua 112: 201–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Chung-hye, and L. Siegel. 1997. “Syntactic and Semantic Conditions on NPI Licensing in Questions.” Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , CSLI, Stanford: 177–191.
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1971. The Sentence in Written English: A Syntactic Study Based on an Analysis of Scientific Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2002. “What Do They Mean? Questions in Academic Writing.” Text 22 (4): 529–557.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larreya, Paul. 1984. Le possible et le nécessaire. Modalités et auxiliaires modaux en anglais britannique. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee-Goldman, Russel. 2006. “Rhetorical Questions and Scales: Just What Do You Think Constructions Are for.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Construction Grammar 4 , Tokyo University.
Lyons, John. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moirand, Sophie. 1999. “L’explication.” In L’astronomie dans les médias, ed. by Jean-Claude 
Beacco, 141–167. Paris: Presses de la Sorbonne Nouvelle.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pic, Elsa, and Gregory Furmaniak. 2010. “Grammaire et degré de spécialisation.” ASp 58: 39–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. “Les modes de discours, interface entre texte et grammaire dans les langues de spécialité.” ASp 62: 25–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. “A Study of Epistemic Modality in Academic and Popularised Discourse: The Case of Possibility Adverbs Perhaps, Maybe and Possibly”. 
Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos 18: 11–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Challenging Points of View in Research Articles and Popular Science Articles: A Case-Study of Rhetorical Questions.” Paper presented at the XXXIII International VAKKI Symposium . Vaasa, Finland.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohde, Hannah. 2006. “Rhetorical Questions as Redundant Interrogatives.” San Diego Linguistics Papers 2: 134–168.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold. 1971. “Queclaratives.” Chicago Linguistic Society 7: 223–231.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2001. “Interaction in Academic Writing: Learning to Argue with the Reader.” Applied Linguistics 22/1: 58–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varttala, Teppo. 2001. Hedging in Scientifically Oriented Discourse: Exploring Variation According to Discipline and Intended Audience. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tampere.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwarts, Frans. 1997. “Three Types of Polarity.” In Plurality and Quantification, ed. by Fritz Hamm, and Erhard W. Hinrichs, 177–237. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Curry, Niall
2023. Question illocutionary force indicating devices in academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Wermuth, Maria-Cornelia
2016. Language localization in scientific drug information. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 3:1 ► pp. 74 ff. DOI logo
Furmaniak, Grégory
2015. A quoi sert la modalisation a posteriori ?. Anglophonia 19 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue