In:Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 201–221
Epistemic struggles in addiction Therapeutic Community meetings
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.10pin
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.10pin
In this study I analyse Therapeutic Community (TC) group meetings for persons with drug addiction problems. Using the method of Conversation Analysis, I specifically focus on practices of knowledge management and sharing between the educators and clients of a TC in Italy. As part of their institutional remit, the educators encourage the clients to report information on their activities and to disclose aspects of their inner experience. This can lead to epistemic struggles, in which the clients resist providing information and the educators seek to overcome such resistance by making claims of pre-existing knowledge about the clients’ experience. After describing the design and sequential positioning of such claims, I argue that their use is functional to manage one of the dilemmas that characterise the educators’ professional practice.
References (19)
Drew, Paul. 1998. “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295–325.
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt. 1988. “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35: 398–417.
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2011. “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakib Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45: 30–52.
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond. 2012. “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koshik, Irene. 2010. “Questions That Convey Information in Teacher-Student Conferences.” In “Why Do You Ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed, and Susan Erlich, 159–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, R., T.R. Edwards, R. Chilvers, C. David, and H.J. Elliott. 2009. “Twenty-four Hour Care for Schizophrenia (Review).” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2: CD004026.
Mandelbaum, Jenny. 1991/1992. “Conversational Non Cooperation: An Exploration of Disattended Complaints.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 25: 97–138.
Peräkylä, Anssi, and David Silverman. 1991. “Owning Experience: Describing the Experience of Other Persons.” Text 11: 441–480.
Pomerantz, Anita. 1980. “Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device.” Sociological Inquiry 3-4: 186–198.
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Galina B. Bolden. 2010. “Preference Organization of Sequence-initiating Actions: The Case of Explicit Account Solicitations.” Discourse Studies 12: 501–533.
Sacks, Harvey. 1987. “On the Preference for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2000. “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Making for Conversation.” Language in Society 29: 1–63.
. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Hitzler, Sarah
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.