Cover not available

In:Educating in Dialog: Constructing meaning and building knowledge with dialogic technology
Edited by Sebastian Feller and Ilker Yengin
[Dialogue Studies 24] 2014
► pp. 203–221

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Knowledge negotiation using technology

Potentials of technology and the knowledge negotiation model

Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.24.10yen
In everyday social interactions, we negotiate knowledge in order to minimize knowledge differentials between us and other people. Although this takes place in everyday life, it is not widely studied and there are few supporting technologies. This paper analyzes the process of knowledge negotiation and the current state of supporting technologies. It aims to provide a knowledge negotiation model (K-NeMo) that elucidates the essentials of the process. It also provides practical ideas for possible applications of 21st century technologies for the implementation of K-NeMo. This paper will be of utility especially to teachers, technology developers, and researchers seeking a model for the essentials of knowledge negotiations.
References (17)
Baron, Robert A. 1988. “Negative Effects of Destructive Criticism: Impact on Conflict, Self-Efficacy, and Task Performance.” Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (2): 199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellucci, Emilia, and John Zeleznikow. 2005. “Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that Support Mediators: a Case Study of the Family_Winner system.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2): 233–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bingham, Lisa Blomgren, Tina Nabatchi, and Rosemary O’Leary. 2005. “The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government.” Public Administration Review 65 (5): 547–558. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunbar, Kevin. 1997. “How Scientists Think: On-line Creativity and Conceptual Change in Science.” Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes 461–493. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 1999. “Basic Emotions.” In Handbook of Cognition and Emotion 4, ed. by Tim Dagleish, and Mick Power, 5–60. New York, et al.: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fisher, Roger, and William L. Ury. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving in. Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrera, Oriel, and David A. Fuller. 2005. “Shared Knowledge: The Result of Negotiation in Non-Hierarchical Environments.” In Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use, ed. by Hugo Fuchs, Stephan Lukosch, and Ana C. Salgado, 255–262. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, Sungsoon, Gary E. Bolton, Ling Rothrock, and Jeannette Brosig. 2010. “Towards an Interdisciplinary Perspective of Training Intervention for Negotiations: Developing Strategic Negotiation Support Contents.” Decision Support Systems 49 (2): 213–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petraglia, Joseph, and Bryce Glass. 1999. “Technological Support for Knowledge Negotiation.” In HICSS-32. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , IEEE, 1999. [URL]. (last date of access 19 Sept. 2013).
Pommeranz, Alina, Pascal Wiggers, Willem-Paul Brinkman, and Catholijn M. Jonker. 2012. “Social Acceptance of Negotiation Support Systems: Scenario-based Exploration with Focus Groups and Online Survey.” Cognition, Technology & Work 14 (4): 299–317. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, Carl, and Richard E. Farson. 1979. “Active Listening.” In Organizational Psychology, ed. by David Kolb, Irwin Rubin, and James MacIntyre, 108–116. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoop, Mareike, Aida Jertila, and Thomas List. 2003. “Negoisst: A Negotiation Support System for Electronic Business-to-Business Negotiations in e-Commerce.” Data and Knowledge Engineering 47 (3): 371–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stahl, Gerry. 2003. “Knowledge Negotiation in Asynchronous Learning Networks.” In Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , IEEE, 2003. [URL]). (last date of access 19 September 2013).
. 2006. Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stahl, Gerry, and Thomas Herrmann. 1999. “Intertwining perspectives and negotiation.” In Proceedings of the international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work , 316–325, ACM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stahl, Gerry, T. Koschmann, and D. Suthers. 2006. Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wentzel, Kathryn R. 1997. “Student Motivation in Middle School: The Role of Perceived Pedagogical Caring.” Journal of Educational Psychology 89 (3): 411–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Karahoca, Adem & İlker Yengin
2018. Understanding the Potentials of Social Media in Collaborative Learning. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fourth Edition, ► pp. 7168 ff. DOI logo
Karahoca, Adem & İlker Yengin
2019. Understanding the Potentials of Social Media in Collaborative Learning. In Advanced Methodologies and Technologies in Media and Communications [Advances in Multimedia and Interactive Technologies, ], ► pp. 572 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue