Cover not available

In:Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. 209–220

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Conclusion

Stockholm University

Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.10sha
References (18)
Bhatia, Vijay K. 2002. “Applied genre analysis: a multi-perspective model”. Ibérica 4: 3–19.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Worlds of Written Discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline. 2006. Historical Discourse: The Language of Time, Cause and Evaluation. ­London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstede, Geert. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. New York: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken, and Tse, Polly. 2007. “Is there an ‘academic vocabulary’?” TESOL Quarterly 41 (2): 235–253.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyon, Sunny. 1996. “Genre in three traditions: Implications for ESL”. TESOL Quarterly 30 (4): 693–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karahan, Pinar. 2013. “Self-mention in scientific articles written by Turkish and Non-­Turkish authors”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 70 (25): 305–322. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuteeva, Maria. 2013. “Graduate learners’ approaches to genre-analysis tasks: Variations across and within four disciplines”. English for Specific Purposes 32 (1): 84–96. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Thomas. 1998. “Visual persuasion: A comparison of visuals in academic texts and the popular press”. English for Specific Purposes 17 (1): 29–46. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, Ana I., and Suárez, Lorena. 2008. “A study of critical attitude across English and Spanish academic book reviews”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7 (1): 15–26. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar. 2012. “With regard to L2 academic writing: the use of topicalisers in L1 (English and Spanish) and L2 (English) research articles”. Brno Studies in English 38 (2): no page numbers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Okamura, Akiko. 2000. The roles of culture, sub-culture and language in scientific research articles. Unpublished PhD thesis, Newcastle-upon-Tyne: University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, Alcaraz Ariza, Maria Ángeles, and Zambrano, Nahirana. 2003. “The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995)”. English for Specific Purposes 22 (3): 223–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Philip. 2006. “Evaluative language in evaluative and promotional genres”. In Variation in Business and Economics Discourse: Diachronic and Genre Perspectives, Gabriela Del Lungo, Marina Dossena and Belinda Crawford (eds), 152–165. Rome: Officina Edizioni.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiainen, Katrina. 2012. A Genre Analysis of Academic Research Blogs. MA Thesis Department of Modern Languages. University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vassileva, Irena. 2000. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin, ­Nordrhein-Westfalen: Asgard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue