Cover not available

In:Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. ix–xvi

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Foreword

Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.01for
References (27)
Bakhtin, Mijail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, translated by Caryl Emerson & Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertau, Marie-Cécile. 2011. “Dialogue: Where language meets activity. An essay review of language as dialogue – from rules to principles of probability by Edda Weigand (2009)”. International Journal for Dialogical Science 5 (1): 17–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgess, Sally. 2002. “Packed houses and intimate gathering: Audience and Rhetorical structure”. In Academic Discourse, John Flowerdew (ed), 196–215. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, Dahl, Trine, and Torodd, Kinn. 2006. Academic Voices – Across Languages and Disciplines. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2005. “Conflict and consensus: Construing opposition in Applied Linguistics”. In Strategies in Academic Discourse, Elena Tognini Bonelli and Gabriela Del LungoCamiciotti (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2002. “Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing”. Applied Linguistics 23 (2): 215–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005a. “Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse”. Discourse Studies 7: 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005b. Metadiscourse. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lafuente-Millán, Enrique, Mur-Dueñas, Pilar, Lorés-Sanz, Rosa, and Vázquez-Orta, Ignacio.(eds). 2010. Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2000. “Beyond Exchange: APPRAISAL Systems in English”. In Evaluation in Text, Susan Hunston and Geoff Thompson (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James R., and White, Peter Robert Rupert. 2005. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín-Martín, Pedro. 2005. The Rhetoric of the Abstract in English and Spanish Scientific Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993a. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. A Textlinguistic Study. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12: 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Descriptions or explanations? Some methodological issues in contrastive rhetoric”. In Academic Writing in Context, Martin Hewings (ed), 43–54. University of Birmingham Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. “Genre as social action”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mur Dueñas, Pilar. 2007. “‘I/we focus on…’: A cross-cultural analysis of self-mentions in business management research articles”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6: 143–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Attitude markers in business management research articles: a cross-cultural corpus-driven approach”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20 (1): 50–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 1996. “Voices in the text: Discourse perspectives on language reports”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17 (4): 501–530.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salager-Meyer, Françoise, Alcaraz-Ariza, Mª Angeles, and Zambrano, Nahirana. 2003. “The scimitar, the dagger and the glove: Intercultural differences in the rhetoric of criticism in Spanish, French and English medical discourse (1930–1995)”. English for Specific Purposes 22 (3): 223–247. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija, and Mauranen, Anna.(eds). 1996. Academic Writing: Intercultural and Textual Issues. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009. Language as Dialogue. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Pascual, Daniel & Pilar Mur-Dueñas
2022. Dialogic interaction with diversified audiences in Twitter for Research Dissemination Purposes. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Jiménez, David & Paulina Meza
2022. Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la escritura académica y profesional. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Álvarez Álvarez, Manuela & Alba Naroa Romero González
2022. Descubriendo qué estrategias de dialogicidad y posicionamiento se emplean en las introducciones y conclusiones de trabajos fin de grado. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue