Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (43)
References
Anderson, David R. 1993. “Razing the framework: Reader-response criticism after Fish.” In After Poststructuralism: Interdisciplinarity and Literary Theory. Nancy Easterlin and Barbara Riebling (eds), 155-176. Evanston Il: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, Martin (with Thomas Austin). 2000. From Antz to Titanic: Reinventing Film Analysis. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beja, Morris. 1971. Epiphany in the Modern Novel. London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne C. 2003 [1983]. “The problem of distance in The Portrait of the Artist.” In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: A Casebook. Mark A. Wollaeger (ed.), 59-83. Oxford: Oxford UP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. The Company We Keep: An Ethics of Fiction. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boyd, Brian. 1998. “Jane, Meet Charles: Literature, evolution, and human nature.” Philosophy and Literature 22: 1-30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Homer Obed. 1972. James Joyce’s Early Fiction: The Biography of a Form. Cleveland: The Press of Case Western University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, Joseph. 2004. Literary Darwinism: Evolution, Human Nature, and Literature. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cosmides, Leda and John Tooby. 2000. “Evolutionary psychology and the emotions.” In Handbook of Emotions, 2nd ed. Michael Lewis and Jeanette M. Haviland-Jones (eds), 91-115. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Damasio, Antonio. 2000. The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness. London: Vintage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert. 1993. “Closing the gap between linguistics and literary study: Discourse analysis and literary theory.” Journal of Advanced Composition 13: 423-448Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Easterlin, Nancy. 2012. A Biocultural Approach to Literary Theory and Interpretation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellmann, Richard. 1982. James Joyce. Rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretative Communities. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gottschall, Jonathan and D.S. Wilson. 2005. The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greene, Joshua and Jonathan Haidt. 2002. “How (and where) does moral judgement work?” TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences 6: 517-523. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Craig A. and Ralph Schneider. 2002. “From Iser to Turner and beyond: Reception theory meets cognitive criticism.” Style 36: 640-658.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, David. 2009. Basic Elements of Narrative: What’s the story? Malden, MA: Blackwell-Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hogan, Patrick Colm. 2011. What Literature Teaches Us about Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1994. Der Akt des Lesens. Stuttgart: UTB.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joyce, James. 1992. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenner, Hugh. 2003 [1948]. “The Portrait in perspective.” In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: A Casebook. Mark A. Wollaeger (ed.), 27-57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lodge, David. 1996. The Practice of Writing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mellmann, Katja. 2010. “Objects of ‘empathy’: Characters (and other such things) as psycho-poetic effects.” In Characters in Fictional Worlds. Jens Eder, Fotis Jannidis and Ralph Schneider (eds), 416-441. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 1999. When Voices Clash: A Study in literary pragmatics. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller-Wood, Anja. 2012. “No ideology without psychology: The emotional effects of Shakespeare’s Henry V.” Style 46: 355-377.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nichols, Shaun. 2005. “Innateness and moral psychology.” In The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence and Stephen Stich (eds), 353-369. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nolan, Emer. 2003 [1995]. “Portrait of an aesthete.” In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: A Casebook. Mark A. Wollaeger (ed.), 281-296. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parrinder, Patrick. 2003 [1984]. “A Portrait of the Artist.” In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: A Casebook. Mark A. Wollaeger (ed.), 85-128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Phelan, James. 2007. Experiencing Fiction: Judgments, Progressions, and the Rhetorical Theory of Narrative. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pilkington, Adrian. 2010. “Metaphor comprehension: Some questions for current accounts in relevance theory.” In Explicit Communication. Belén Soria and Esther Romero (eds), 156-172. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plotkin, Henry. 2002. The Imagined World Made Read: Towards a Natural Science of Culture. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rossman, Charles. 1982. “The reader’s role in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” In James Joyce: An International Perspective. Suheil Badi Bushrui and Bernard Benstock (eds), 19-37. Gerrards Cross: Barnes and Noble Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sell, Roger D. (ed.). 1991. Literary Pragmatics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Literature as Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slingerland, Edward. 2008. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, C.P. 1993 [1964]. The Two Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tan, Ed S.H. and Nico H. Fridja. 1999. “Sentiment in film viewing.” In Passionate Views: Film, Cognition, and Emotion. Carl Plantinga and Greg M. Smith (eds), 48-64. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tooby, John and Leda Cosmides. 2001. “Does beauty build adapted minds? Toward an evolutionary theory of aesthetics, fiction and the arts.” SubStance 30: 6-27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tooby, John, Leda Cosmides and H. Clark Barrett. 2005. “Resolving the debate on innate ideas: Learnability constraints and the evolved interpenetration of motivational and conceptual functions.” In The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence and Stephen Stich (eds), 305-337. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valente, Joseph. 2003 [1994]. “Thrilled by his touch: The aestheticizing of homosexual practice in A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man.” In James Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man: A Casebook. Mark A. Wollaeger (ed.), 245-280. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Ghent, Dorothy. 1967. The English Novel: Form and Function. 1953. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zunshine, Lisa. 2006. Why We Read Fiction: Theory of Mind and the Novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue