In:Literature as Dialogue: Invitations offered and negotiated
Edited by Roger D. Sell
[Dialogue Studies 22] 2014
► pp. 115–134
Narrative and talk-back
Joseph Conrad’s “Falk”
Published online: 7 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.22.06tok
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.22.06tok
References (46)
Babb, Howard S. 1962.Jane Austen’s Novels: The Fabric of Dialogue. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Bergson, Henri. 1929 [1896]. Matter and Memory. Nancy Margaret Paul and W. Scott Palmer (trans.). London: Allen and Unwin.
Conrad, Joseph. 1964 [1903]. “Falk: A Reminiscence.” The Nigger of the ‘Narcissus.’ Typhoon. Amy Foster. Falk. To-morrow. London: Dent, pp. 145–240.
Cohn, Dorrit. 1978. Transparent Minds: Narrative Modes for Presenting Consciousness in Fiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Erdinast-Vulcan, Daphna. 2002 [1999]. The Strange Short Fiction of Joseph Conrad. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fish, Stanley. 1970. “Literature in the Reader: Affective Stylistics.” New Literary History 2: 126–62. [Reprinted, with comments in Fish 1980.]
. 1980. Is There a Text in This Class? The Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Fishelov, David. 2010. Dialogues with/and Great Books: The Dynamics of Canon Formation. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Genette, Gérard. 1980. Narrative Discourse: An Essay on Method. Jane E. Lewin (trans.). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 2005 [1967]. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New Brunswick: Transaction, pp. 5–23.
Harrison, Bernard. 1993/1994. “Gaps and Stumbling-Blocks in Fielding: A Response to Cerny, Hammond and Hudson.” Connotations: A Journal for Scholarly Debate 3.2: 147–72.
Iser, Wolfgang. 1993. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kinzel, Till, and Jarmila Midldorf (eds). 2012. Imaginary Dialogues in English: Explorations of a Literary Form. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter.
Lang, Berel. 1990. “Politics and the New History of Truth.” Writing and the Moral Self. London: Routledge, pp. 38–41.
Nabokov, Vladimir. 1980. “Good Readers and Good Writers.” Lectures on Literature. Ed. Fredson Bowers. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, pp. 1–6.
Palmer, John A. 1968. Joseph Conrad’s Fiction: A Study in Literary Growth. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Perry, Menakhem. 1979. “Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meanings [With an Analysis of Faulkner’s ‘A Rose for Emily’].” Poetics Today 1. 1–2: 35-64, 311–61.
Rabinowitz, Peter J. 1987. Before Reading: Narrative Conventions and the Politics of Interpretation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Systematics for the Organization of Turn Taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735.
Said, Edward W. 1986 [1966]. “The Past and the Present: Conrad’s Shorter Fiction.” In Joseph Conrad: Modern Critical Views. Harold Bloom (ed.), 29-51. New York: Chelsea House.
Schwartz, Daniel R. 1971. “The Significance of the Narrator in Conrad’s ‘Falk: A Reminiscence’.” Tennessee Studies in Literature 16: 103–10.
Sell, Roger D. Communicational Criticism: Studies in Literature as Dialogue. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2011.
Selwall, Harry. “Cannibalism and the Colonial Imaginary: A Reading of Joseph Conrad’s ‘Falk’.” JLS/TLW22. 1/2 (June 2006): 158–74.
Sternberg, Meir, 1982. “Point of View and the Indirections of Direct Speech.” Language and Style 15: 67–117.
. 2003. “Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (I).” Poetics Today 24.2 (2003): 297–395.
Stromberg, David. 2013. “Narrative Faith: Structural Complexity and Moral Vision in Dostoevsky, Camus, and Singer.” Doctoral dissertation. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Tanner, Tony. 1976. “‘Gnawed Bones’ and ‘Artless Tales’ — Eating and Narrative in Conrad.” In Joseph Conrad: A Commemoration: Essays from the 1974 International Symposium on Conrad. Norman Sherry (ed.) 17-36. London: Macmillan.
Toker, Leona. 1993. Eloquent Reticence: Withholding Information in Fictional Narrative. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.
. 1994-5. “If Everything Else Fails, Read the Instructions: Further Echoes of the Reception-Theory Debate.” Connotations: A Journal for Critical Debate 4: 151–64.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
