In:Approaches to Slavic Interaction
Edited by Nadine Thielemann and Peter Kosta
[Dialogue Studies 20] 2013
► pp. 187–212
Irony in the face(s) of politeness
Strategic use of verbal irony in Czech political TV debates
Published online: 13 August 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.20.15maz
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.20.15maz
This paper examines the possible strategies behind the use of verbal irony in Czech political TV-debates (since 1993) and the various factors that influence politicians’ behavior in those debates. Since TV debates among politicians usually involve the participants trying to prove their point, they are set up as verbal duels and, therefore, foster either negative use of irony against the opponent or positive use to enhance the speaker’s own positive face. The choice of whether to use irony or not can thus become part of a larger strategy of how the politician and maybe even his whole party want to present themselves in the media. The reaction to ironic remarks, especially those that attack the positive face, can also play an important part, since it can help save the victim’s face or hurt it further.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Ettensperger, Felix, Thomas Waldvogel, Uwe Wagschal & Samuel Weishaupt
Colston, Herbert L.
Weizman, Elda
2015. Irony in and through follow-ups. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 259], ► pp. 173 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
