In:Dialogue in Politics
Edited by Lawrence N. Berlin and Anita Fetzer
[Dialogue Studies 18] 2012
► pp. 69–88
Watch dogs or guard dogs?
Adversarial discourse in political journalism
Published online: 21 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.18.07bul
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.18.07bul
Research on interaction between political journalists and politicians is reviewed in three different contexts: broadcast interviews, press conferences, and news broadcasts. Substantive evidence strongly supports the view that journalists’ discursive techniques have become progressively more adversarial and confrontational over time, such that adversarialism has become the norm for contemporary political journalists. From their perspective, these techniques might be seen as an intrinsic part of defending democracy, the so-called “watchdog” theory of the press. But from an alternative perspective, journalists might be depicted as the Rottweilers of democracy, using discursive techniques that reduce dialogue in politics, creating instead a culture of confrontation and hostility.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Comstock, Lindy
2023. Journalistic practice in the international press corps. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 11:2 ► pp. 145 ff.
Pennock-Speck, Barry
Pennock-Speck, Barry
Schroeter, Melani
2018. “All this is a boon to Britain’s crumbling democracy”. In Doing Politics [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 80], ► pp. 361 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
