In:Dialogue in Politics
Edited by Lawrence N. Berlin and Anita Fetzer
[Dialogue Studies 18] 2012
► pp. 21–42
Internet newspaper discussion lists
A virtual political arena?
Published online: 21 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.18.05ens
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.18.05ens
Most internet newspapers offer opportunities to post reactions. In view of their content, these discussions are political in the sense that they concern actual societal issues: internet users may express their civil concerns and opinions. These discussion lists are evaluated regarding the question how readers’ reactions may be used as a source of information about prevalent discourses in society on a certain point in time. This question is addressed on the basis of three specific cases, namely readers’ reactions to news reports about:1. Geert Wilders’s anti-Islam film Fitna (March 2008);2. The broadcast of hidden camera footage of a convict in prison (April 2010);3. A call for a ban on head scarves (March 2011).These lists turn out to be kaleidoscopic at best, useful as preparation for a survey or as an inventory for argumentation.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Chovanec, Jan
2018. Irony as counter positioning. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30], ► pp. 165 ff.
Chovanec, Jan
Ensink, Titus
2015. Framing the Queen’s head scarf. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 139 ff.
Johansson, Marjut
2015. Bravo for this editorial!. In Follow-ups in Political Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 60], ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
