In:Professional Communication across Languages and Cultures
Edited by Stanca Măda and Răzvan Săftoiu
[Dialogue Studies 17] 2012
► pp. 213–236
Small talk – a work of frame
Published online: 19 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.12saf
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.17.12saf
The academic interest for social relationships and the way they are organized in dialogues can be traced back to the beginning of the 20th century, once Malinowski (1923) first suggested that human share “phatic communion”. The British anthropologist focused his studies on local tribes from Oceania and closely analyzed their interaction. In studies on small talk (Laver 1975; Coupland, Coupland, Robinson 1992; Eggins, Slade 1997; Coupland 2000; Jaworski 2000; McCarthy 2003; Mirivel, Tracy 2005), the authors closely analyzed phatic sequences (initial or final) or full phatic conversations, but the concept was not clearly and fully defined. In the first part of this paper, I will review some theories on interpersonal communication so that I could suggest an integrating definition for small talk. In the second part, I will analyze the way in which phatic communion is constructed at work, and more specifically during workplace meetings and in other professional settings.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Chui, Mike Hin Leung, Bernie Chun Nam Mak & Gary Cheng
Mak, Bernie Chun Nam
2019. Doing business and constructing identities through small talk in workplace instant messaging. Pragmatics and Society 10:4 ► pp. 559 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
