Cover not available

Action Research

From practice to writing in an international action research development program

PaperbackAvailable
ISBN 9789027217783 (Eur) | EUR 72.00
ISBN 9781556198328 (USA) | USD 108.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027299390 | EUR 72.00 | USD 108.00
 
Get fulltext from our e-platform
Supported bilaterally by Sweden and Norway, the Scandinavian Action Research Development Program (ACRES — Action Research in Scandinavia) emphasized conceptualizing research questions and self-conscious writing processes for experienced action researchers. Participants came from Norway, Sweden, Finland, Holland, Great Britain, and the United States.
A learning experiment in the tradition of Scandinavian industrial democracy, ACRES had both intellectual and organizational tensions common to action research projects. This book includes theoretical and historical overviews of action research, reflections on the writing process, narratives about the design and difficult internal processes of ACRES, and a selection of the participants’ writings. A particularly unique feature of the book is the discussion of the problematic relationship between action research and conventional modes of research writing and an analysis of the complex social processes collaboratively managed projects create, in combination with a set of participant cases.
[Dialogues on Work and Innovation, 8] 1999.  ix, 282 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Published online on 21 October 2008
Table of Contents
Cited by (21)

Cited by 21 other publications

Mashhadi, Farzad, Mina Sajadi & Saeedeh Kavoshian
2026. Emotional Vulnerability of Iranian EFL Teachers in the Context of Online Collaborative Action Research. In Emotional Vulnerability of Language Teachers in Digital Settings,  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Finnestrand, Hanne
2025. Building Democracy at Work: The Contributions of Morten Levin to Action Research and Organizational Development. Systemic Practice and Action Research 38:1 DOI logo
Kaufmann, Gerd
2020. Methodology to Align Lean and Value-Based Management. In Aligning Lean and Value-based Management [Contributions to Management Science, ],  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Pomares, Egoitz
2020. Workplace Innovation Programmes: bridging research and policymaking. International Journal of Action Research 16:1-2020  pp. 40 ff. DOI logo
ATAY, Hakan & Ülker ÇOLAKOĞLU
2019. İŞE ORYANTASYON SÜRECİNDE YAŞANAN SORUNLAR: KUŞADASI A GRUBU SEYAHAT ACENTALARI ÖRNEĞİ. Öneri Dergisi DOI logo
Dege, Martin
2017. Aktionsforschung. In Perspektiven kritischer Psychologie und qualitativer Forschung,  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Buckley, Jim, Nour Ali, Michael English, Jacek Rosik & Sebastian Herold
2015. Real-Time Reflexion Modelling in architecture reconciliation: A multi case study. Information and Software Technology 61  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Alm, Hakan, Paul Janecek & Olov Forsgren
2014. Co-design Research and Business Development: Case of Scandinavian Airlines (SAS). Systemic Practice and Action Research 27:5  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Rai, Rajnish Kumar
2012. A participatory action research training initiative to improve police effectiveness. Action Research 10:3  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Wilson, Andrew & Benita Wilson
2011. Pedagogy of the repressed: research and professionality within HE in FE. Research in Post-Compulsory Education 16:4  pp. 465 ff. DOI logo
Walji, Nazir
2009. Leadership: an action research approach. AI & SOCIETY 23:1  pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Pohl, Christian & Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn
2008. Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés 16:2  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Brannick, Teresa & David Coghlan
2007. In Defense of Being “Native”: The Case for Insider Academic Research. Organizational Research Methods 10:1  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Lim, Eric T K, Shan Ling Pan & Chee Wee Tan
2005. Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems – understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies. European Journal of Information Systems 14:2  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Ennals, Richard
2004. Europe as a Knowledge Society: Integrating Universities, Corporations, and Government. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17:3  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
MIKKELSEN, BENT EGBERG
2004. ARE TRADITIONAL FOODSERVICE ORGANIZATIONS READY FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE? (A CASE STUDY OF IMPLEMENTATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN A WORK PLACE CANTEEN FACILITY). Foodservice Research International 15:2  pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
van Kopplen, Anthea
2004. ‘Supermodern Gorgeous!’. In Protecting the Future,  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Blanck, Peter, Heather Ritchie, James Schmeling & David Klein
2003. Technology for independence: a community‐based resource center. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 21:1  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Schensul, Jean J.
2002. Democratizing Science Through Social Science Research Partnerships. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 22:3  pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Schensul, Jean J.
2010. 2010 Malinowski Award Engaged Universities, Community Based Research Organizations and Third Sector Science in a Global System. Human Organization 69:4  pp. 307 ff. DOI logo
Milofsky, Carl
2000. Transparent Research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects and metadata

Main BIC Subject

Main BISAC Subject

ONIX Metadata

ONIX 2.1
ONIX 3.0

LoC, MARC XML

U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  98055950 | Marc record
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue