Cover not available

Review published In: Diachronica
Vol. 6:2 (1989) ► pp.271278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (8)
References
Ard, Josh. 1982. “Auxiliary do: Support or emphasis?”. Linguistics 201.445–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, John M. 1981. “On Fallen Horses Racing Past Barns”. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior ed. by Carrie S. Masek et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellegârd, Alvar. 1953. The Auxiliary Do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie. 1977. “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 8:1.63–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley. 1980. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Black-well.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen. 1986. “So You Support the Do Support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spok-en English”. Papers from the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation , Stockholm, December 11–12,1985 ed. by Sven Jacobson, 35–50. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Prince, Ellen. 1982. “A Comparison of Topicalization and Left-Dislocation in Discourse”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America held in San Diego, Calif., 27–30 December 1982.
Stein, Dieter. In press. The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Natural, stylistic and varietal factors in the development of do. A case study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue